Originally posted by: tellyme
I am getting your points and yes there are so many underlaying pointers from both the side.It has become debatable because makers have been very confused about their own writing. They contradict their own dialogues. One day it's something and the other day they show a contradictory dialogues.
With such pathetic writing. They have not cleared on anything , they have left it open ended for us to decipher things as her our understanding and then reversing it as per their need.
Men should not be made villian to show woman mahan - I completely agree but I think the writers have very low capability and they cannot show FL mahan without degrading ML. With good writing, there could have been ways to take things with consistency, not making Ani the villian and still make J fight her own motherhood battle. But writers have limited skillset and prefers to take an easy path.
I am only talking based on what they are showing. I am not in agreement of what they are showing. As per their current writing, J does not know that he cannot remember and thus her statements coming as if he is lying. Also, she is not here to ask his love. Her annulment signing was to give up on her love. Here it is matter of her child and thus she is back to get her child's right and not Ani's love. he can very well be married to Arshi but her point is to get the name of father for her child. Also, I am not in agreement of all the stupid mahanta she did to give up Ani and his love. But here the point is all about the child's right and not love.
I have objection with only this - And so the reaction Aditya ka paap. If she is roaming around with a man doesn't mean she is sleeping with him. And if she is saying that it's his child, he should at least think of what and why she is saying rather than claiming it to be Adi's child just because he saw them roaming together. Such big allegation on woman should only be placed if you know 100 percent . both are doing PDA like kid but that allegation is little too big.
Other all points of her staying here etc ,I don't like it but right or wrong is completely debatable and based of persons perspective. In all, I will say you have valid points all throughout it's just a matter of perspective and how debatable they have made it, that we can all come up with various arguments.
Jhanak is no less stupid and less arrogant and have been unreasonable at many other occasions and her character equally contributed to kill Runak. It's both their doing
Also, Ani is not a villian for me, just being a big gadha. He is stuck in a situation and not behaving like a gentleman at all.
And above all, The character sketching is so pathetic and inconsistence that it does not even deserve the debate.
comment:
p_commentcount