I understand Abhira's actions considering her tall claims are questionable but she isn't completely wrong/unreasonable. Armaan "never" led on Abhira but did he set boundaries with deal wife? They shared insignificant relationship where he wasn't accountable if he promised to get married to his bhabhi while being married to deal wife but, then he shared his memories, his pain with her, he let Abhira support him emotionally, helped her wear accessories (which I don't think just friends like to do), kissed Abhira's forehead intentionally, showed his haq as a husband when she had an accident, helped her financially like a life-partner not only because she is his zimmedari. Never objected to Abhira's claims infront of Ruhi "Even if I'm Armaan's wife for a month I'm his real wife". He should have clarified "Abhira you are not my real wife so stop these claims". Why he gave explanation to Abhira or tried to pacify her that he didn't get those divorce papers in Massorie? What was the need of clarification or making her understand as if he was her real husband? Armaan could've told Abhira that she was overreacting on seeing divorce papers as they have to end that deal after 3 months. He never thought why is Abhira behaving as if she never wanted a divorce. By the logic of deal marriage having no value, him blaming Abhira for Charu's kand shouldn't also be objectionable as what's the need of trust in deal marriages?
What Ar-Ru had shouldn't be termed EMA but didn't people here term it EMA during those episodes? Addressed him two-timers too now it all changed. Armaan never led Abhira on and isn't answerable to Abhira regarding Ruhi. If so, then why Armaan was termed a pendulum, spineless by majority literally for months. People also called him unworthy of Abhira and wondered how would he be redeemed. His actions weren't even 1% questionable if he never led Abhira on or, if his equation with Ruhi was normal. He wasn't obligated to tell Abhira about it as their relationship wasn't real or significant it was just a deal. Why they are even showing Armaan's redemption? As Armaan wasn't at all wrong. What wrong he did if he never led on Abhira?
Bekar main people criticised him for months Why didn't people defend him that time saying Armaan isn't wrong at all going by the logic of deal marriage holding no significance.
Akshara didn't request Armaan to stay married to her daughter for one year. Ar-Ab agreed on a deal after getting married to each other "after" signing a legal document infront of lawyer just like court marriage which had no clause of one year marriage contract. They didn't sign any legal document for their contractual relationship or didn't modify clauses of their marriage certificate to accommodate one year clause. Is verbal agreement easy to prove in court?
If a man gave his property to any of his/her relatives by signing property transfer papers (legal document) will property shares be given to the person he verbally addressed his heir or to the person he transferred his shares to by signing legal papers?
comment:
p_commentcount