Abhira ki vakalat || DT NOTE P.17||

Abhira uss ghar mai dadisa ke sath itne time se reh rahi thi fir bhi usko itna khud se samaj nahi aaya ki orthodox log criminal bhi ho aisa zaruri nahi hota 

Koi bhi normal person or lawyer apne ghar mai he jab aisi baat ho toh pehle ghar mai dhang se baat kar ke sab aspect se case ko check karta hai. Agar ghar mai se sahi se information na mile toh case ki detail bahar se gather karne mai efforts dalta hai . Yaha abhira ko ghar mai dadisa se 4 sawal karne par jo chahiye tha wo response nahi mila toh sidha aakho dekhi 4 chizo ke grounds unke against case fight karne par utar ayi. Kaun sa vakil bina in/out case par inquiry kiye aise kisi ke against ho jata hai specially jab ap unke sath ek ghar mai rehte ho and apko unke character/nature/personality ko kafi closely observe kiya ho while living together under the same roof. 

Meri saas chahe kitni bhi orthodox ho lekin kisi bhi 4 aakho dekhe proofs ko dekh kar bhi mai yeh na manu ki mummyji kahi bahar aag lagva sakti hai  Kyunki jab ek ghar mai 2 ladies sath rehti hai tab pata hota hai ki kaun kya karne ke liye capable hai and uske liye lawyer ki padhai ki bhi zarurat nahi hoti  And jab muje pata hai ki mere se toh yeh dhang se baat karne se rahi, tab toh mai zyada outdoor ja kar case study par focus karu par itna toh muje pakka pakka pata ho ki meri maha orthodox saas bahar aag lagvane jaisa crime kar he nahi sakti  

Must say Abhira is terrible lawyer seeing daadi saas wala court case.

Edited by sweet_tania - 1 months ago

I missed your posts Tania Ji As usual ye gaya ball boundary ke bahar

Hahahaha Facts 💯💯

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

I missed your posts Tania Ji As usual ye gaya ball boundary ke bahar

Thank you diya 
Dadi ke case mai I have no words for abhira ki vakalat  

Originally posted by: chaipaani

Hahahaha Facts 💯💯

After a longggg time  

Originally posted by: sweet_tania

Thank you diya 

Dadi ke case mai I have no words for abhira ki vakalat  

that was hilarious actually 

ek baar bolthi hai main un gareebon ko insaaf dilaungi. 

phir bolthi hai dadisa mujhe aap par bharosa hai. When dadisa feels happy thab bolthi hai aap boliye ek baar aapne ye nahi kiya 

it's like mujhe gareebon ko insaaf dilana hai which is directly propotional to dadisa ko jail bhejna 

dadisa ne agar jhoot bol diya unhone nahi kiya toh ye maan jayegi. Khud ki akl ka use nahi karna hai. 

She has to decide - >

1.  Poddar's ko chodkar lawyer banna hai toh she should vacate the house immediately. 

2. Poddar's ko saath lekar lawyer banna hai toh she should take a neutral stand and let other lawyers handle the case. 

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

that was hilarious actually 

ek baar bolthi hai main un gareebon ko insaaf dilaungi. 

phir bolthi hai dadisa mujhe aap par bharosa hai. When dadisa feels happy thab bolthi hai aap boliye ek baar aapne ye nahi kiya 

it's like mujhe gareebon ko insaaf dilana hai which is directly propotional to dadisa ko jail bhejna 

dadisa ne agar jhoot bol diya unhone nahi kiya toh ye maan jayegi. Khud ki akl ka use nahi karna hai. 

She has to decide - >

1.  Poddar's ko chodkar lawyer banna hai toh she should vacate the house immediately. 

2. Poddar's ko saath lekar lawyer banna hai toh she should take a neutral stand and let other lawyers handle the case. 

 Agar usko gareebo ko insaaf dilana hai toh sab se pehle ghar ke bahar ja kar thik se case ke ek ek pehlu and behind the scenes ko samjo uske baad kisi ke against Jung chedo! 

Muje dadi par bharosa hai and Muje unke mooh se mere sawal ke jawab bhi chahiye yeh scene isiliye hua kyunki uss time usne khud case par kuch bhi study nahi kiya tha, jitni 4 cheeze dekhi usi ke grounds par insaaf ka morcha hath mai le liya.

Lawyer ka kaam pehle behind the scenes ka pata lagana hota hai , uske baad case fight karne ki jung ka elan kiya jata hai , mooh se haa yaa naa mai jawab do otherwise tumhare against case fight karugi aise kaun karta hai ! 😂😂😂😂

Originally posted by: sweet_tania

 Agar usko gareebo ko insaaf dilana hai toh sab se pehle ghar ke bahar ja kar thik se case ke ek ek pehlu and behind the scenes ko samjo uske baad kisi ke against Jung chedo! 

Muje dadi par bharosa hai and Muje unke mooh se mere sawal ke jawab bhi chahiye yeh scene isiliye hua kyunki uss time usne khud case par kuch bhi study nahi kiya tha, jitni 4 cheeze dekhi usi ke grounds par insaaf ka morcha hath mai le liya.

Lawyer ka kaam pehle behind the scenes ka pata lagana hota hai , uske baad case fight karne ki jung ka elan kiya jata hai , mooh se haa yaa naa mai jawab do otherwise tumhare against case fight karugi aise kaun karta hai ! 😂😂😂😂

imagine if dadisa was really a criminal and abhira ko jhooth boldhe my daughter abhira maine kuch nahi kiya 

Will she say haan dadi i trust you gareeb log ek number ke jhoote hai 😂 

If dadisa is not criminal phir if usne insaaf dila diya hotha toha toh nyay kaha hotha  ? 😂

Aur gaav valon patha bhi nahi hoga ye poddar bahu hai. Aur isne case liya hai  toh in a way it was not even right 😂

If ye real life main hotha toh agar dadisa innocent hothi toh media wale unko culprit bana dethe by saying abhira ne dokhe se gareebon ko bewkoof banakar case hargayi aur dadisa gunehgaar thi. Jisse dadisa ka jo humiliation hotha woh hotha.

If dadisa was criminal and if she does not win her case villagers will never trust her that she did total justice rather she will be called as gaddar. 

I don't think abhira blamed dadisa because dadi is orthodox. It has got nothing to do with being orthodox. Abhira had proofs , hence she questioned dadi. I agree just because dadi ne apne paksh mein safai nahi di, doesn't mean abhira should have automatically assumed dadi is wrong. But all the proofs she got were against dadisa & Personal life is different from professional. 

Also, i wouldn't give opinion or comment about your personal life & what you would have done if it was your saas,  because I criticize characters, not real people , but i do get what you are trying to say, and i somewhat agree that she should have believed.

Originally posted by: Sneha.Narayanan

I don't think abhira blamed dadisa because dadi is orthodox. It has got nothing to do with being orthodox. Abhira had proofs , hence she questioned dadi. I agree just because dadi ne apne paksh mein safai nahi di, doesn't mean abhira should have automatically assumed dadi is wrong. But all the proofs she got were against dadisa & Personal life is different from professional. 

Also, i wouldn't give opinion or comment about your personal life & what you would have done if it was your saas,  because I criticize characters, not real people , but i do get what you are trying to say, and i somewhat agree that she should have believed.

I have never said dadi is orthodox so she blamed her. Nope. I never meant that in any of my statement.

As I said, she had proofs but at that moment usne apni taraf se koi case study bahar nikal kar nahi kiya tha. Jo dekha jitna dekha usse sach maan kar usne dadi ke against Jung ka elan kar diya jo muje sahi nahi laga kyunki Lawyers aise function nahi karte.  

Professional and personal life ka difference samajna toh bahot durrr ki samaj hai, woh samaj aate aate toh abhi time hai lekin usse pehle the way ki mere 4 sawal ka jawab dedo muje otherwise I will fight case against you aise koi lawyer function nahi karte.  While saying this, woh professional bhi nahi lag rahi thi and personal jaisa toh kuch tha he nahi. Professional person aisa cases mai samnewale judi ek ek baat ko har ek aspect se soch kar action leta hai. Dekhe dikhayi 4 chizo ke grounds par nahi. Yeh thoda zyada he ho gaya tha uski side se.