GHKKPM Episode discussion #100 - Page 104

Originally posted by: sadiltl

You know what makes Virat excusable? Pakhi's adamancy in not seeing his pain. She is getting everything from Virat at gunpoint.

Noone asks a man to promise to sleep with her, when she is dying. Not only Virat, any man with heart will promise her at that moment.

Thats why Virat is not wrong. His vows and HM trip are forced. She was not taking medicines and not taking care of herself...literally forced him to sleep with her at gunpoint.

Just like she made him to say She is devki and Yashoda both for Vinu. Both the situations are the same!!

We have to see at situations why he did what he did. 🥱

I dont think Virat is a man who will let a woman die, if he could save her with taking a promise and going on a trip labelled as HM. That too When he is already in a namesake marriage!

This is my take.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

He went on HM with her na...he went too far....ab backtrack kaise karega?

But thinking & having emotions for another woman is okay

He backtracked on many things before so why not this when P herself said he is still into Sai and she lost him to Sai . Pakhi has accepted it so why isn’t he ending from his side instead of giving P an option to come back anytime she changes her mind . Instead of nodding his head as no when P claims Sai is more than mother of his kids he can accept it and go back to the original terms where he won’t leave P but won’t be a normal husband. The question is whether he wants to . He gets a kick playing Mayan and victim at the same time .

Originally posted by: sadiltl

You know what makes Virat excusable? Pakhi's adamancy in not seeing his pain. She is getting everything from Virat at gunpoint.

Noone asks a man to promise to sleep with her, when she is dying. Not only Virat, any man with heart will promise her at that moment.

Thats why Virat is not wrong. His vows and HM trip are forced. She was not taking medicines and not taking care of herself...literally forced him to sleep with her at gunpoint.

Just like she made him to say She is devki and Yashoda both for Vinu. Both the situations are the same!!

We have to see at situations why he did what he did. 🥱

I dont think Virat is a man who will let a woman die, if he could save her with taking a promise and going on a trip labelled as HM. That too When he is already in a namesake marriage!

After bus accident, Pakhi was mad at him...told him that she will not believe his assurances...refused to sleep in the same room with him & was shifting to another room

Virat went behind her tirelessly...to console her, apologize to her, convince her that he did not choose Sai

It was Virat who got HM tickets, Pakhi did not ask for it or blackmail him at gunpoint

It was Virat's decision to take pheras

After all these efforts she might have got convinced that he means to make the marriage work...

Originally posted by: Sinmegh

Sai is not rich anymore so that’s why she is wearing these simple cosmetic jewellery .. also savi was wearing the same stuff in her birthday

That's what I thought. The difference in the jewellery was stark. They wanted to show the difference that Sai with her simplicity looked better than everyone. Ashwini too had a small smile when she first saw her then she looked embarrassed. Ninaad'a look was hilarious....he too thought Sai looked better and was exasperated that his gyaan went to waste 😆

I didn't like Pakhi's look much though it looked good in still shots.. trying too hard... too much jewellery, too much make up.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

You know what makes Virat excusable? Pakhi's adamancy in not seeing his pain. She is getting everything from Virat at gunpoint.

Noone asks a man to promise to sleep with her, when she is dying. Not only Virat, any man with heart will promise her at that moment.

Thats why Virat is not wrong. His vows and HM trip are forced. She was not taking medicines and not taking care of herself...literally forced him to sleep with her at gunpoint.

Just like she made him to say She is devki and Yashoda both for Vinu. Both the situations are the same!!

We have to see at situations why he did what he did. 🥱

I dont think Virat is a man who will let a woman die, if he could save her with taking a promise and going on a trip labelled as HM. That too When he is already in a namesake marriage!

Even if we give him BOD for HM but why is he not drawing boundaries with P now . If Pakhi can handle Sai in the same household , V supporting Sai openly , V’s truth bombs at times then she can handle him keeping her at a distance . Let’s say we don’t like to do something and when we are asked to we say NO when we know the other person can handle it . Pakhi can handle it as she gave up on him but yet Virat never says NO when it comes to drawing boundaries.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

You know what makes Virat excusable? Pakhi's adamancy in not seeing his pain. She is getting everything from Virat at gunpoint.

Noone asks a man to promise to sleep with her, when she is dying. Not only Virat, any man with heart will promise her at that moment.

Thats why Virat is not wrong. His vows and HM trip are forced. She was not taking medicines and not taking care of herself...literally forced him to sleep with her at gunpoint.

Just like she made him to say She is devki and Yashoda both for Vinu. Both the situations are the same!!

We have to see at situations why he did what he did. 🥱

I dont think Virat is a man who will let a woman die, if he could save her with taking a promise and going on a trip labelled as HM. That too When he is already in a namesake marriage!

@bold when did it happen 😳

Didn't she clearly say free me from this marriage because u love ur ex wife. Yes she guilt tripped him. But not to the extent that he had to sacrifice his body to her.

Imao it was her who left the room , it was virat who pursued her to not leave the room.

It was virat who planned honeymoon to make pakhi believe he is into the marriage fully.

Virat is a man who won't let a woman die? Sadly he was the man who let his love of his life spend time in jail without caring about her, who ousted her, who starved her.

It's so unconvincing excuse that pakhi forced virat to do everything and virat is wonderful man who did everything to save a life.

Let's go and rewind the episodes to know who made initiatives first, who made first move , who initiated hugs, feeding things.

Pakhi was ok with compromising marriage for years. She expressed her sadness but didn't forced virat to make a move on her.

After sai entry it is virat who made every move on her. Who again and again assured she is his wife, she has full rights.

After that pakhi started exercising her rights which virat himself gave her.

Just because virat now suddenly realised his love for sai. It doesn't undo the things he did in past.

Now he is "forced to compliment" her. But he was the same man who complimented her beauty happily without any force on the day which was supposed to be his and sai's anniversary day that he forget.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

This is my take.

Just now posted my response

It really doesn’t matter

In earlier times we used to have kings marrying different woman some to win some land , some to protect and keep in family .. you really think they slept with all .
virat n patralekha had a ceremonial wedding. Now she may expect a lot of stuff .. but she cannot force a man to have S,,x with her if he does not want to

Patralekha is not living in dark ages that she cannot come out of this marriage she can always divorce him .. there also grounds of annulment regarding this

Samrat should have then physically forced her to become intimate with him .. he never did that .he did not even shame her publicly

patralekha is low life .. she publicly forces everyone to force virat to sleep with her .. and everyone knows that virat does not want to sleep with her

If he did not sleep with her when she a young mature woman .. why will he agree to do it after menopause.. .

regarding fidelity.. virat is not a saint . The issue is he does not want to do it with patralekha.. in his mind he had tagged her as samrat ki patni .. and he has qualms regarding that

he may have married her as he was quite sure he will not want to sleep with her

If he had got married to some other girl who had no history with Sai he may not have been so loyal to Sai

just because you are married yo someone you cannot force the person to have sex with you .. No means No

it works on both sides . You can divorce .. and leave the person .
Many people do if they have an unsatisfactory sex life .. I myself know about 2 cases

Where the couple had not been intimate for quite some time and then they split up

Originally posted by: 404_NotFound

He backtracked on many things before so why not this when P herself said he is still into Sai and she lost him to Sai . Pakhi has accepted it so why isn’t he ending from his side instead of giving P an option to come back anytime she changes her mind . Instead of nodding his head as no when P claims Sai is more than mother of his kids he can accept it and go back to the original terms where he won’t leave P but won’t be a normal husband. The question is whether he wants to . He gets a kick playing Mayan and victim at the same time .

See there is this parallel thing that they are showing that Pakhi is also crazy...though they are not being explicit, she knows he loves Sai...& that the marriage is a sham...but is still not willing to let go. On top of that she is Vinayak's mother as of now. So Virat is put on a spot ...a dharam sankat which we will never be able to see unfortunately. 😔 But that's the narrative.

Isse zyaada there is no logic.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

After bus accident, Pakhi was mad at him...told him that she will not believe his assurances...refused to sleep in the same room with him & was shifting to another room

Virat went behind her tirelessly...to console her, apologize to her, convince her that he did not choose Sai

It was Virat who got HM tickets, Pakhi did not ask for it or blackmail him at gunpoint

It was Virat's decision to take pheras

After all these efforts she might have got convinced that he means to make the marriage work...

Yes thats why I said her making a move on him in HM is not her fault. She was made to believe he wants to start afresh.

@bold We have to see from both PoVs right. See, it is unfair right if he chooses to save Sai and constantly be bullied for that. He has a valid point that he thought Pakhi was out of the bus.

She can behave like Virat never loved Sai. But Virat has to CONSCIOUSLY put her above Sai. She is human, but he is not.?

First of all, she chided him mercilessly that he saved Sai. When he repeatedly said he didnt see her in the bus.

You guilt trip him. and then to make him promise?

It all starts from her adamancy to not accept that he doesnt love her.

Even Maldives trip long before. They are in conditional marriage. He doesnt like going to HM trip with her. She starves and cries, making a person feel bad and obligated. Then he would say he will go for HM trip.

Again, if she is married to him there is nothing wrong. She can ask all this. But not when there is a conditional marriage. See how Sai dealt with deal marriage. There also she believed Virat loved Pakhi. There is a difference.

If you see cause and effect at every stage, she should never demand anything from him because it is conditional marriage. Right? This is exactly what we all discussed in Deal marriage phase. Just because Virat's feelings changed, he cannot expect Sai to change her feelings right? Virat also adhered to it. He waited till Sai changed her feelings for him. He continued his efforts. He didnt blackmail Sai at gunpoint to love him.

Pakhi is doing that with Virat. We have to be fair irrespective of the gender.

PS: Ignoring the mistakes Virat committed with Sai. I am just talking about Pakhi and Virat.