Patriachy glorification in name of women empowerment - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

1.2k

Users

7

Likes

17

Frequent Posters

myviewprem thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 7 months ago
#11

Originally posted by: The_Best

no, but I don’t find this a sweeping statement. It’s fact shows/fictions largely reflect what’s going in the society. They won’t make shows which the audience can’t relate to as that won’t bring them profits. There’s a reason why this show is getting highest trps. Most women don’t have good marriages and in-laws. They see hope in anupama who got a better husband after having an abusive and cheater husband and abusive in-laws. So they keep watching the show to see her journey. Tomorrow if the lives for most women improve in India and they don’t have a strong patriarchal culture and society to deal with, most won’t relate to crying heroine and shows like this anymore and producers will be forced to make different shows. Many women I know watch Indian/pakistani shows because they relate to them.


I agree to you regarding women condition in not only india but entire asia/africa is not that good in most house holds


Only very few households woman have equal rights like men these are mostly highly educated and rich family who live in big cities. I know woman working in big cities in big company but have to ask permission of husband to spend more or big of their own salary. In india even if woman works her money or pay check is controlled by father or husband not independently. Decisions are made by men how to use money earned by that woman.


Problem in india versus western country is there more women are employed and financially independent 80 to 90% in india only 25% are in jobs i mean earning jobs atleast those who above 16 years and a bit educated.


Hence when husband cheats in western country women there can walk out easily as they are financial good and society does not ill treat widows or single woman like india or asia. In india just try staying as single woman or divorced even own family and relatives try to take advantage if you have no husband . I know highly educated woman in big company hit and abused by husbands not able to divorce because their family tells them not to they will not accept daughter back or their daughter with kid back. So for lack of support highly educated woman stay in marraiges. When actress like esha deol stay with cheating abusive hubby when gauri khan never dare give divorce on cheating how will other woman dare?


That does not happen in USA/UK whether you are single or divorced woman get respect and not ill treated by society there. And laws are powerful no one can misbehave with woman there in roads or office and get away easily like harassment here. There is no safety for single woman or woman with kids who is divorced or widowed or childless here in india and asia. That is one reason woman take how much ever abuse and stay with husband or in laws if widowed.


That is where anupama kind of story became an inspiration because it gives hope to other woman suppressed by husband or his family


That is also a reason i am disappointed by how anupama treated a second chance a second marraige and second family and in laws.


She never deserved a second chance because shes unworthy of it. May be a dimpy or Malvika deserved second chance much more and would use it than a anupama


Anuapma is highly patriarchal thoughts just like shahs vanraj and baa. She always objected to anuj buying costly gifts to CA like silver plate to eat or taking her to big hotel to eat etc all waste of money. Anupama still believes blood is bigger adopted. She did not support kinjal to leave toshu when he did EMA but tried to fool/gaslight kinjal into accepting toshu. She did not tell anuj when vanraj was doing EMA to malvika. Many times shes kept quiet which shows she has regressive patriarchal mindset only like vanraj and baa etc.


You can only take horse to a water hole cannot drink on his behalf. Same with anupama all opportunities lost bby her thinking and attitude.


If anupama had not divorced vanraj in future she would become baa junior to dimpy/kinjal/adhik etc

Edited by myviewprem - 7 months ago
HoneyBee7312 thumbnail
Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail Anniversary 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 7 months ago
#12

I am just amazed at how the makers have twisted the narrative to the point where the Second husband and adopted daughter have become the villain

Conveniently forgetting the 26+ years of abuse dolled out by Vanraj and Baa and SH by extension.

Instead now the whole narrative has become Adhya was ungrateful, Anuj questioned Anupama and that's why she is sad and unhappy.

Just smiley32

The cheater who called Anupama mentally unstable is deemed Acche Pita

The hag who cursed her to hell and back is Baa Bhagwan

The children who character assassinate her at the drop of a hat will be served eternally

And the man who respected her, always supported her. The daughter who truly valued her are horrendous and unforgivable?

What utter rubbish this show turned out to be.

Bodhianveshika thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 months ago
#13

The western world, somehow brings a world of opportunities and is faaar more liberal than Asian/African countries, yet, for some weird reason the percentage of women in executive roles, influential positions and/or entrepreneurship is pretty strong in India 🤔 (depending on how one'd define entrepreneurship).

While the first known Company (according to Google) remains Kalpana Saroj (of Kamani Tubes), Mahila Griha Udyog was set up way back in 1959 by 7 Housewives.

We can now flaunt of a number of such enterprising women many of who come from conservative and humble backgrounds.

Then there are the more well known and acknowledged people like Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, Falguni Nayar, Ritu Kumar, Radhika Gupta, Shahnaz Hussain, Roshni Nadar-Malhotra, Leena Nair, Vandana Luthra, Swati Ajay Piramal, Soumya M U.


No world is immune to suppressing women's rights. Violence against women is as prevalent in the western world being no exception. To say, it is a thing of the past, would be wishful thinking. Every geography has problems that are intrinsic to their social fabric.

Just as, as a woman from urban India, one may not have visibility into rural India, the same would be the case with any urbaner about the suburban areas of the respective western countries.

No Media is Absolutely transparent. It cannot and may be, should Not be. This, influences our opinions and perceptions.


Be that as it may, the bottomline is, Anupama is NO representation of the condition of women in India.

If anything, Anupama is an example of nothing relatable to women. There are contrasting opinions and TRPs do Not indicate likeability of the show.

An example would be discussions on this forum.

Additionally:https://x.com/PadhaiKaroPadai/status/1762042331992371653?t=E7WZWFu1IZbFZgiN_CbfwA&s=08

https://x.com/AdhiraMoonchild/status/1761204294886568069?t=3E_lM1zRBy3ZK57ZMv90yw&s=08

Edited by Bodhianveshika - 7 months ago
Top