Kiran was no less but did she deserved to be abused? Did she deserved to be hit? Did she deserved to be pushed when she was expecting and lose her baby?? If these are not enough reason for divorce than what should be the reason?
Originally posted by: PyarayAfzal
How come Farida's condition was worse than Kiran?and Digest Writer is
not Umera's script. Are you siding with Sikandar because he was not
shitty faced but according to you Shaukat was so Farida should have
taken divorce but kiran shouldn't have. In my opinion Farida should have
also taken divorce.
Abby why are you comparing different serials?
Kiran was no less but did she deserved to be abused? Did she deserved to be hit? Did she deserved to be pushed when she was expecting and lose her baby?? If these are not enough reason for divorce than what should be the reason?
Originally posted by: ABBY_JERAN
No I m not siding with sikandar I m saying if they had to justify the divorce in kankar they shud hv shown sikandar to b a far worse man to justify that...other than the anger issue he was perfect whereas gals endure so many more shit from their hubbies but still compromise
If the story of kankar was to show women not tolerating shit from hubbies then show the hubby in that light...don't show him as a loving loyal hubby who was helpless in his own anger issues and wanted someone to understand him n show the right path instead of a over sensitive overeating wife who goes away to her maayika at the drop of a hat every time there is a small argument and don't even inform him
If kiran tolerated sikandar so did he tolerated her nakhras
Originally posted by: PyarayAfzal
What was in Kiran that Sikandar was tolerating? that she went to 'her parent's home' for 'her sister's mehendi' without 'his permission' (but she 'told his mother'), from where Sikandar called her back and even then she apologized for that. This is what Sikandar tolerated?
On the other hand, she was tolerating verbal and physical both abuses. Aur kitna bura dikhatay?
And if you are blaming Kiran for miscarriage then it means you have the same thought at the back of your mind that if a woman argues then it is alright for a man to raise his hand and see kiran was arguing so of course sikandar raised his hand so Kiran is to blame for it. Sikandar did not have any right to raise his hand and he did, so he is solely to blame for this.
And why did Sikandar raise his hand for the first time? What did Kiran do then?
^Not only men Hina but women also. When kankar was being aired you should have read comments on Umera's fb page. There were ladies who were saying that she is promoting divorce through this drama... and those women said that Sikandar should have been forgiven.
Originally posted by: ABBY_JERAN
The losing of the baby was equally her fault
Sikandar didn't push her intentionally she provoked him with her constant bickering and made him seem like he is committing a big crime jus coz he was too tired to go to the dawat...if she was so concerned abt the child itna uchaal kiyu raha hain for the dawat...he didn't stop her from going to the sisters house...she had the car the driver...not as if she needed a man to accompany her for her safety...she cud hv jus attended the dawat herself n made an excuse for sikandar ...what was the point to keep on crying cribbing on sikandars head when he wanted to take rest n hv some peace after a hard days work
Geez give the hubby a break
comment:
p_commentcount