Why not Vicky if Alia was accepted?

Shaitan-Haiwan thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 4 months ago
#1

I see so many comments on here that Vicky is ugly and what not. And I want to ask, if you were ready to accept Alia Kapoor as the "top heroine", then why not Vicky?

Alia is also not good-looking, and cant even hold a spark to the level of beauty we have had in the past. She neither has the looks nor physicality, nor the dancing skills or even aura that a top heroine has.

Also - whats wrong with the way Vicky looks? You all keep making fun of him and its annoying. I think he is GORG. How come this forum only considers Hrithik, Ranbir and Sid good looking and not Vicky? The other day I called Ajay Devgn a snack and was attacked too. Beauty comes in diverse forms....Ajay and Vicky are also good looking, not to mention the charm/intensity is a whole other thing smiley42

Vicky has arrived and is STAYING. He can act, he can dance, he is hot in his own way - and there is so much more on the way from him.

Edited by Shaitan-Haiwan - 4 months ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

34

Views

2.5k

Users

23

Likes

61

Frequent Posters

infinity101 thumbnail
Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail Anniversary 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 4 months ago
#2

Vicky is hot, of late he has started looking like a snack, much better than Kat anyway.

tero_bau thumbnail
Posted: 4 months ago
#3
Alia is not considered beautiful as far as I have observed the people's comments. So that comparison is not valid. You can compare Vicky with that Chapri looking Kartik Aryan. I have seen many people considering him as a snack or what not. Vicky is far far better looking than Kartik .
Briaahna thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 4 months ago
#4

such long kathas ..Tired Season 1 GIF by Nanalan'

Maroonporsche thumbnail
Posted: 4 months ago
#5

Do a macro and ask why can’t Ammy be accepted ?

Shaitan-Haiwan thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 4 months ago
#6

Originally posted by: tero_bau

Alia is not considered beautiful as far as I have observed the people's comments. So that comparison is not valid. You can compare Vicky with that Chapri looking Kartik Aryan. I have seen many people considering him as a snack or what not. Vicky is far far better looking than Kartik .


That was my point......we've accepted her despite not being beautiful. So if people are saying Vicky is ugly, then why can't they look past that also?

Grumpydwarf24 thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 4 months ago
#7

While I agree with you. But I think you are microscopically looking at this forum. As a whole on Reddit and Pinkvilla Vicky has a lot more fangirls than Aloo ever had a fanboys. Some may not see it. But the man has his own unique appeal.

IMO Vicky is more attractive than Varun, Tiger, and yes, feminine-looking Ranbir. There has been nothing ruggedly masculine about him ever since he entered. He was thin and looked like Neetu Kapoor face-wise. Due to alcohol and smoking his looks have only been further deteriorating.

Grumpydwarf24 thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 4 months ago
#8

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan


That was my point......we've accepted her despite not being beautiful. So if people are saying Vicky is ugly, then why can't they look past that also?

Next we will be looking past Sara, Jahnvi, Suhana, and Ananya. Who neither really are great looking compared to 90s actresses or that talented. smiley41

IAmLuvBolly thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 4 months ago
#9

Colorism and bigotry with a bit of classism thrown in there. Vicky has darker complexion so he’s not seen as handsome. Ranbir and Varun are not good looking men but they’re fair skinned so people call them handsome. Also if Vicky was a Kapoor or a Dhawan or a Bhatt he would have been seen differently. Sad but true unfortunately.

Other factors at play are also KJo’s marketing, and PR, which has really elevated Alia in every way. And women have the advantage of make up, and there’s hair styling too. Women are seen more glammed up than men so Alia has that advantage too over Vicky.

Vicky is not classically handsome but he is attractive. Alia is not gorgeous but she has a cute face.

Grumpydwarf24 thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 4 months ago
#10

Originally posted by: IAmLuvBolly

Colorism and bigotry with a bit of classism thrown in there. Vicky has darker complexion so he’s not seen as handsome. Ranbir and Varun are not good looking men but they’re fair skinned so people call them handsome. Also if Vicky was a Kapoor or a Dhawan or a Bhatt he would have been seen differently. Sad but true unfortunately.

Other factors at play are also KJo’s marketing, and PR, which has really elevated Alia in every way. And women have the advantage of make up, and there’s hair styling too. Women are seen more glammed up than men so Alia has that advantage too over Vicky.

Vicky is not classically handsome but he is attractive. Alia is not gorgeous but she has a cute face.

Ranbir also takes advantage of styling I would argue. His wig is not any less than woman's hair styling. And I am pretty sure male actors wear makeup as well in the film industry.

At least Vicky still has a full head of hair!

https://www.healthline.com/health/smoking/does-smoking-cause-hair-loss

Edited by Grumpydwarf24 - 4 months ago
Top