I know people won't like my opinion but I have to say this now...
Shehzada's portrayal was much much better than Rohit's Armaan?
Why?
Because Shehzada ke Armaan ke saath wo angst, wo suffocation dikhta tha jo ek Golden child cum scapegoat ka hota hai. Jis par Ghar ki sari responsibilities daal di jati hain, jise dusro ki faults ka bojh uthana padta hai.
Rohit's ka Armaan to khud conformist dikhai deta hai. Uska to ye lagta hai ki wo jo kuch bhi kar rha hai wo uska khud ka nature hai. Jabki Shehzada wala Armaan jab Abhira ke saath rude hota tha to saaf taur par lagta tha ki he is emotionally conflicted (not because of love for her. Isliye ki wo nahi chahta ki Ghar me koi Klesh ho, he used to look like someone who doesn't want to be the cause of problems in the family. Someone who is treated as bojh).
Note: Although ITV ke shows ki kahani etni ridiculous hoti hain, especially YRKKH, ki aise character sketch likhna waste of time lagta hai. Mujhe khud bhi lagta hai ki is faaltu ki story me etni mehnat ki jarurat hi kya hai? Actors ko bhi 7/10 tak limited rahna chahiye. Kya jarurat hai Zero kahani ki script me 9 ya 10/10 wali mehnat karne ki! Udhar ghum me bhi kya fayda hua Shakti Arora ki mehnat ka! Kahani to shitty hai! Aur makers ko bhi kadar nahi.
Jaise Bollywood movies me heroines ko eye-candy ki tarah use karte hain waise hi TV par bhi MLs ko aise show piece banakar rakha jata hai. Makers chahte hain wo toxic ho, sirf heroine par chillaye. Aur Audience chahti hai ki wo sirf heroine ka dupatta sambhale aur uski aankho me khoya rahe!
Uski koi 3 dimensional kahani, koi character arc nahi likhna chahta.
comment:
p_commentcount