Originally posted by: SavitaBarbie
The story was out long ago. I'll be the bad guy here and say somebody who is as unattractive as this guy finding somebody like Karishma in an arranged marriage has a LOT to do with money and financial status. There's no beauty for any beholder to behold. But what does 'financial promises' mean here ? If she meant promises made to her it sounds like an allowance. Which if it was promised ,should have been given but eeks ,it's tacky to go to court about it. I assumed it meant he defaulted on commitments made to others and it made her feel threatened ( risky of seizure bankruptcy etc ).
"Karisma also alleged that Sanjay refused to follow up on his financial commitments, to which, Sunjay argued that Karisma only married him for his money."
I think it means he promised money to her and/or her family and then reneged on it
But in this article her Dad says the opposite. "We are Kapoors, we have money, we have talent, he is third class, I never wanted my daughter marrying him" etc etc
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2348405/he-forced-me-to-sleep-with-his-friends-auctioned-me-karisma-kapoor-on-divorce-with-sunjay-kapur
Anyway, things said during divorce proceedings and child custody are not always 100% or even 50% true. LOT of mudslinging (lawyers are involved)
comment:
p_commentcount