Originally posted by: flipfl0p
I don't know Lakshmi's story.
But I can say about Anand Kumar. If you see the movie, first thing that comes to our mind is, how can he run the boarding school for free without any income. It is not possible. The real Anand Kumar balances it out by doing commercial tuitions as well as this charity coaching. (Part of the money he earns, he spends for the mobilisation of these unprivileged kids). As he has become famous for his experiment, his competitors, accusing him of advertising his charity coaching. May be he does. May be not all 30 might not get entered in IT. Let's presume, it is only 15.
But fact is, he could have got away, without doing anything. But society always tries to pull down someone, who gets fame for a cause. (Like whenever a celebrity donates, they call it as peanuts for his income and brand him kanjoos).
Allegations started with a quora posts (which surprisingly appreared more after the film was announced). Based on quora posts, an article was made. Now, it is an allegation. To me, even if has used them for advertising his coaching centre, still it is a good work.
Regarding 1983. Betting scandal surfaced in India in mid or post 90s, when DCompany was powerful. Not during World Cup (1983 time). It was Azhar, who was mainly found guilty. Manoj Prabhakar used the time to brand other cricketers. A committee was formed based on his accusations. But it did not find Kapil Dev's involvement. In fact, it found Manoj Prabhakar himself being guilty. Then Manor Prabhakar said, why he would have accused, if he himself was involved. Nothing was clear, who was clean or dirty. Most probably (I believe) Kapil was not involved. Even if he was, that has nothing to do with 1983. (I still trust Kapil though).
comment:
p_commentcount