Originally posted by: roopshas1
Nimmi is a spoiled sociopath who thinks she is the queen of the world. She is what pop culture calls a mean girl. She is the kind of person who chooses targets based on perceived weaknesses. Sitara was her equally gorgeous cousin whose only weakness was that she was orphaned and people like Nimmi just use that to hurt others to make themselves feel better. In her delulu eyes, Sitara was actively pursuing Salar's attention and unlike in Nimmi's case, Salar was actually responding positively to Sitara. It had far less to do with Salar himself and more to do with Sitara being happy and looking at a potentially happy (and wealthy) future with Salar.
Kiran's insecurities were different. Sitara was the beautiful and brilliant younger cousin who was practically chosen above her, the plain Jane, the moment any rishta came. Kiran was the hurt insecure one, unlike Nimmi who is straight up a vial of poison, but unfortunately thanks to her mother's influence, she was being intolerable mean to Sitara.
Ultimately, Kiran's arc was satisfying because it delved into insecurities and showed that had she have had love and upbringing without comparison from the get go, she would have turned out to be a nice human being. Nimmi was however a bad person til the end, it just happened that the person she married was an equally vile human being and we were forced to feel sorry for her circumstances.
But yes, frankly, outside of the context, there is actually very little difference between Nimmi and Kiran's actions. They were so happy at Sitara's wedding to Majid and frankly that is why I wanted them both to be humiliated in their marriages or weddings. Unfortunately that did not happen.
comment:
p_commentcount