I have never seen him look this way at Aishwarya - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

90

Views

7.8k

Users

37

Likes

161

Frequent Posters

Bekind thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 months ago
#61

Originally posted by: infinity101

Maine toh kuch aur padha tha ki Babita wasn’t too happy with her not so successful soon to be damad, and she demanded some separate property under her daughter’s name as security, so this irked the Bacchans and they called off the engagement.

sahee suna tha aap ne. 5 words woohoosmiley40


sharaban thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 months ago
#62

Jitni strong headed aur stubborn Karishma hai, she would not have survived even a few years with these toxic Bachchans.

SavitaBarbie thumbnail
Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 months ago
#63

Originally posted by: Jazzkapur

bold- no, not becoz of revealing clothes, Her dance moves looks cringe n vulgar n graceless to me, some people call that sexy n graceful that's their opinion but it's my personal opinion but I don't call her escort for that

I didn't call her (or anybody ) an escort either so what are you arguing about ? 😆 . You didn't answer my question. Why is Nora vulgar to you ? What makes her dances moves vulgar ?

Jazzkapur thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 months ago
#64

Originally posted by: SavitaBarbie

I didn't call her (or anybody ) an escort either so what are you arguing about ? 😆 . You didn't answer my question. Why is Nora vulgar to you ? What makes her dances moves vulgar ?

u equated Aishwarya doing kajra re dance as being an escort. It's ur words "I don't see being an escort as any worse than doing Kajra Re( especially the last few seconds of it ) to revive your career." Like really? N yes I find nora's dance moves cringe n vulgar. I would cringe if the same dance moves are done by a male dancer also n I'll consider it vulgar then also
SavitaBarbie thumbnail
Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 months ago
#65

Originally posted by: Jazzkapur

u equated Aishwarya doing kajra re dance as being an escort. It's ur words "I don't see being an escort as any worse than doing Kajra Re( especially the last few seconds of it ) to revive your career." Like really? N yes I find nora's dance moves cringe n vulgar. I would cringe if the same dance moves are done by a male dancer also n I'll consider it vulgar then also

Jazz, you need to make up your mind on being judgemental. Are you judgemental or are you not ? It's okay for you to call Nora vulgar ,graceless and cringey but you are outraged when somebody says s3x work isn't inferior to doing item songs. Where do you draw the line ? I did not equate Aishwarya the person with an escort. I said the decision to do Kajre Re ; -the premise of which was a bar girl moving her body in a provocative manner before drunk men who objectify her make lewd remarks and gestures at her and throw money at her isn't any worse that somebody deciding to be an escort. It comes from the same place ,the need to get something ,whether it's fame money or whatever. What I said applies to all three of them ,not just Aishwarya. You see Amitabh and Abhishek thrusting their crotch at her and at the camera. If you find Noras pelvic thrusts vulgar I don't get why you'd see this song differently. ( Btw it's one of my favourite songs; great lyrics by Gulzar and Aishwarya looks stunning in it ).

My comment was not about Aishwarya or item songs or escorts but the hypocrisy of the Bachchans who act like they're this dignified lot who are too good to be associating with the Kapoors when the difference is quite superficial. Wrapping a Kashmiri shawl around you ,enunciating Shudh Hindi or affecting old world manners don't make you dignified. I don't know what went on after her marriage but I don't think Karishma was an escort. I believe the story was planted by the Bachchans because Babita riled them up.

What's cringey is the way you reacted without trying to understand what's being said.

Jazzkapur thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 months ago
#66

Originally posted by: SavitaBarbie

Jazz, you need to make up your mind on being judgemental. Are you judgemental or are you not ? It's okay for you to call Nora vulgar ,graceless and cringey but you are outraged when somebody says s3x work isn't inferior to doing item songs. Where do you draw the line ? I did not equate Aishwarya the person with an escort. I said the decision to do Kajre Re ; -the premise of which was a bar girl moving her body in a provocative manner before drunk men who objectify her make lewd remarks and gestures at her and throw money at her isn't any worse that somebody deciding to be an escort. It comes from the same place ,the need to get something ,whether it's fame money or whatever. What I said applies to all three of them ,not just Aishwarya. You see Amitabh and Abhishek thrusting their crotch at her and at the camera. If you find Noras pelvic thrusts vulgar I don't get why you'd see this song differently. ( Btw it's one of my favourite songs; great lyrics by Gulzar and Aishwarya looks stunning in it ).

My comment was not about Aishwarya or item songs or escorts but the hypocrisy of the Bachchans who act like they're this dignified lot who are too good to be associating with the Kapoors when the difference is quite superficial. Wrapping a Kashmiri shawl around you ,enunciating Shudh Hindi or affecting old world manners don't make you dignified. I don't know what went on after her marriage but I don't think Karishma was an escort. I believe the story was planted by the Bachchans because Babita riled them up.

What's cringey is the way you reacted without trying to understand what's being said.

I'm not judgemental I'm just a person who just has likes n dislikes n I don't like nora's dance moves. It's also the choreographer's fault who invents such type of dance moves so I don't judge nora for that I just don't like these dance moves but the way u presented ur view about Aishwarya's kajra re dance by clearly equating it with being an escort, obviously it looked like u r judgemental sl*tshamer. If ur intention was not that, then good but u need to choose right words for it. N I hope u know that Aishwarya didn't dance in front of actual drunk people, those were background dancers who obviously acted to be drunk
Edited by Jazzkapur - 2 months ago
SavitaBarbie thumbnail
Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 months ago
#67

Originally posted by: Jazzkapur

I'm not judgemental I'm just a person who just has likes n dislikes n I don't like nora's dance moves. It's also the choreographer's fault who invents such type of dance moves so I don't judge nora for that I just don't like these dance moves but the way u presented ur view about Aishwarya's kajra re dance by clearly equating it with being an escort, obviously it looked like u r judgemental sl*tshamer. If ur intention was not that, then good but u need to choose right words for it. N I hope u know that Aishwarya didn't dance in front of actual drunk people, those were background dancers who obviously acted to be drunk

My intention was just that. To make that comparison. Which is why I did. Only that I did not express any judgement one way or the other (yet). And that's not the same as calling a person an escort as a slur. I chose my words so that it sounds exactly as it appeared in the post. How you process them or understand them is not in my control.

You are judgemental. Just like everybody else. You don't just dislike Nora's moves;- you find them vulgar and cringey. That's a judgement. . It's not reasonable to place all the blame on the choreographer . If somebody chooses to sign that contract after knowing what it involves ,they are equally responsible for it unless they were threatened or coerced to sign it. You also look down on escorts which is why you tagged me in the first place. You are not free of judgement. Nobody is.

Now this part is just for you specifically and it's not in connection with my earlier post. It's a tangent. I'm asking you this since the comparison was your main problem with what I said . Here is a simpler scenario. Let's say there's some truth to the rumour about Karishma. Let's say she was a bar girl. Not an escort but a dancing girl who danced to popular item songs . No sex involved, just dancing and note-throwing. Does it really make sense for the Bachchans to dump her because of that and then go ahead and do Kajra Re or marry Aishwarya post Kajra Re ? How is being a bar girl worse than acting as a bar girl in an item song when all that happens in both cases is suggestive dancing ? You shake your stuff and get paid for it. No big difference. It's just a matter of perspective. Saying that it was Aditya Chopra's cameraman who objectified you is a weak argument. Whether the men were actually drunk or not is beside the point lol.

Lord_Voldemort thumbnail
Visit Streak 1000 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 750 0 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 2 months ago
#68

Originally posted by: SavitaBarbie

I don't see being an escort as any worse than doing Kajra Re( especially the last few seconds of it ) to revive your career.


that is an unhinged take
myviewprem thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 months ago
#69

Originally posted by: TorinoPasta

They interfere because ABjr is financially dependent on them. When you are not financially independent, this is what happens.

No financial independence has nothing to do with it

Many actors were financially independent but forced to marry woman of parents choice and not their lovers of their choice be it sunny deol, govinda, bobby deol etc

AB Jr is an obedient kid the one who shall never rebel in life.

Same with Karishma kapoor, shes docile obedient to mother/parents thats why her life turned out like this

IF Karishma was not obedient and docile no way babita could order her around, after all babita, kareena all lived of karishma hard eared money for years, decades. Indeed credit goes to karishma for not going to college but working day and night to get her family financially stable. I doubt kareena contributed financially much to family like karishma did. Its Karishma who shouldered a elder child/working kid responsibility in family and worked like hell 10-12 years till wedding to get them to their rich life style they have even today (babita, kareena) She even gave up her top heroine post and many movies to kareeena and receded back to help kareena establish herself or she could easily work another 5-7 years as top heroine.

For sacrificing her childhood, dreams all for family its sad ppl call her escort etc how sad. Shows good humans do all good work for others than get blamed and targeted for no fault. Ppl should atleast not abuse karishma and give her respect, not all sacrifice their life and dreams for parents and sibling sake like Karishma has done. Karishma life reminds me of ester year heroines like madhubala, mumtaz who worked from childhood for family sake.

Sometimes kids for their life to be happy have to rebel against parents decision or they suffer full life

Edited by myviewprem - 2 months ago
Jazzkapur thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 months ago
#70

Originally posted by: SavitaBarbie

My intention was just that. To make that comparison. Which is why I did. Only that I did not express any judgement one way or the other (yet). And that's not the same as calling a person an escort as a slur. I chose my words so that it sounds exactly as it appeared in the post. How you process them or understand them is not in my control.

You are judgemental. Just like everybody else. You don't just dislike Nora's moves;- you find them vulgar and cringey. That's a judgement. . It's not reasonable to place all the blame on the choreographer . If somebody chooses to sign that contract after knowing what it involves ,they are equally responsible for it unless they were threatened or coerced to sign it. You also look down on escorts which is why you tagged me in the first place. You are not free of judgement. Nobody is.

Now this part is just for you specifically and it's not in connection with my earlier post. It's a tangent. I'm asking you this since the comparison was your main problem with what I said . Here is a simpler scenario. Let's say there's some truth to the rumour about Karishma. Let's say she was a bar girl. Not an escort but a dancing girl who danced to popular item songs . No sex involved, just dancing and note-throwing. Does it really make sense for the Bachchans to dump her because of that and then go ahead and do Kajra Re or marry Aishwarya post Kajra Re ? How is being a bar girl worse than acting as a bar girl in an item song when all that happens in both cases is suggestive dancing ? You shake your stuff and get paid for it. No big difference. It's just a matter of perspective. Saying that it was Aditya Chopra's cameraman who objectified you is a weak argument. Whether the men were actually drunk or not is beside the point lol.

again I really don't think that u even understand the meaning of judgemental. N now u r equating dancing for item songs to being a bar girl but earlier u equated it to being an escort. U can't see an item song just as an item song. There is difference between being a bar dancer n acting like a bar dancer becoz actual bar dancer dances in actual bar in front of actual drunk n tharki people but an actor dance in front of those people who are acting to be drunk n tharki. Actor knows that she is safe.
Edited by Jazzkapur - 2 months ago
Top