They arrived at the wrong time. If they had debuted after 2016, they'd have been a lot more successful.
The 2000s was stacked with great personalities. Today, not so much.
They arrived at the wrong time. If they had debuted after 2016, they'd have been a lot more successful.
The 2000s was stacked with great personalities. Today, not so much.
Fun fact Ayesha was offered Main Hoon Na and Neal and Nikki of yrf
Originally posted by: Maroonporsche
Ayesha Takia was blessed in certain departments đđ
Amrita Rao said she wouldnât do love making scenes. An Iâm asking was anyone offering them to her đ¤Ł
Amrita was my crush. I would have done that
Ayesha messed up her face with plastic surgery and I think she decided to not work. I love Amrita in movies she was so pretty and looked so cute sweet. Amrita had problems with kissing scenes and other scenes but she shouldâve continued acting. I think she is lazy now donât want to work after marriage and kids.
Partly, and it was partly just bad choices on their part too (Ayesha getting married and quitting acting so early and Amrita not trying to do different/ better roles).
There is the nepotism factor as well so we can't deny that both would have probably done a lot better if they had that on their side.
Originally posted by: Anjalika01
Partly, and it was partly just bad choices on their part too (Ayesha getting married and quitting acting so early and Amrita not trying to do different/ better roles).
There is the nepotism factor as well so we can't deny that both would have probably done a lot better if they had that on their side.
@bold exactly that in Amritaâs case! I remember recently my mom put on Ishk Vishk, my dad came down part way and went âoh which one is this, she looks the same in them all.â And obviously, at a time with so many new and upcoming actresses, that wasnât good for her.
Both are very beautiful,amrita was a good actress but ayesha wasnt that good,she was just ok in acting.
Ayesha is beautiful but I find her average as an actor.
But Amrita is beautiful and is a good actor too. She had the potential to do different kinds of roles but I don't know if she sticked to the same kind of roles or was not given the chance to play different characters.
She should have done more work. I loved seeing her on screen.
They debut around 2003-2004 and that was the time were girls like priyanka, lara, katrina, kareena, bips, dia, esha doel etc had also just debuted or were just 2-3 years in the industry, therefore it was very difficult for them to make it with such high competitions.
Maybe if they had debut now they would have been more succesful.
Originally posted by: ..Kavi..
@bold exactly that in Amritaâs case! I remember recently my mom put on Ishk Vishk, my dad came down part way and went âoh which one is this, she looks the same in them all.â And obviously, at a time with so many new and upcoming actresses, that wasnât good for her.
Yep!
Always playing the same unbelievably sugary sweet sanskari girl in every film definitely took Amrita's career downhill...
The only film I can remember where she did anything different was Main Hoon Na, where her role hardly mattered much to the story ...
I actually preferred Ayesha over Amrita tbh, she was more likeable, more versatile and acted better imo
comment:
p_commentcount