Reason behind the split of Tanisha - Uday - Page 2

A pre-nup would be in favor of Uday. If they divorced without a pre-nup, Tanisha could claim exorbidant amounts of money as well as share in his business/property etc. With a pre-nup everything is upfront and each knows what is at risk if/when they divorce.

i didn't even know they were a couple
and uday would benefit from a pre-nup

Originally posted by: soni2004

this article does not make sense and is Uday chopra has more money and more at stake than Tanisha so It would probably be him insisting on one not TAnisha. It wouldn't be in TAnisha's best interest to sign a prenup. It woudl have been in Uday's best interest to sign one. Plus as an FYI, Prenup are not drawn to " ensures equal division of finances and personal liabilities in the event of a divorce" (as per the article) they are drawn to protect each party. For the richer one it's drawn so that their partner cannot walk away with a crazy amount of assets. Normally you keep what you bought into the marriage prior to the marriage and divide what you bought in together after the marriage. The writer really needs to understand the logic behind a prenup.

IE. Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman had prenups,

I think in India the divorce laws are all pro husband.. thats why a lot of men with some money leave their wives to be with younger females a lot.. and the wife has to raise the kids without proper financial support..

maybe Tanisha knows the details about Aditya Chopra's divorce settlements so she wanted financial security herself..

The chopras are stingy and don't even pay their stars their pay most the time, i am sure they would try to rip off their freshly divorced bahus too

very smart on tanisha's part..

when were they both exactly dating?

this article does not make sense and is Uday chopra has more money and more at stake than Tanisha so It would probably be him insisting on one not TAnisha. It wouldn't be in TAnisha's best interest to sign a prenup. It woudl have been in Uday's best interest to sign one. Plus as an FYI, Prenup are not drawn to " ensures equal division of finances and personal liabilities in the event of a divorce" (as per the article) they are drawn to protect each party. For the richer one it's drawn so that their partner cannot walk away with a crazy amount of assets. Normally you keep what you bought into the marriage prior to the marriage and divide what you bought in together after the marriage. The writer really needs to understand the logic behind a prenup.

IE. Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman had prenups,

I agree, it would make more sense if Uday was the one who asked for the prenup and it was Tanisha that got upset. It's Uday who has lots more to lose than Tanisha

I don't think there is anything wrong with a prenup...love today, divorce tomorrow...its kind of common nowadays...its better to be safe than sorry...I think its rather practical if one of the party is rich...

omgggggggggggggg how long have they been together? n now suddenly they split 😛

it's quite sad that tanisha & uday split because of disagreeing over the prenup agreement.😭😭 they both looked so much in love.. i don't blame tanisha though.. i mean she was just being practical.😊