Swara Bhaskar new statement - Page 4

Originally posted by: Lord_Voldemort

I mean it's not that difficult to comprehend looking at the definitions of these terms. A terrorist is a terrorist. Just because the scale is smaller doesn't make you any less a terrorist.

You are a murderer if you murdered 10 people or just 1 person.

It is very convenient to term people as extremists and let them off the hook...well one is an extremist as long as their ideology doesn't translate into terrorizing people by hurting/killing them....the minute that happens they can be termed as terrorists....

Originally posted by: mz.gigglez

And youre going to define whats terrorizing for someone or not? White supremacists are being labelled as terrorists so same applies for any other fanatic. Brutally murdering, lynching, mob attacks, destroying religious temples is equal to terrorism. So yes Hindutvas are no less than terrorist if not worse because thr attacks are constant. And im not a terrorist sympathizer stop jumping to conclusions.

I get it why are you clutching at straws. Go for it. Handful of Taliban terrorist apologizers are ready to stand with you.

Originally posted by: Sharpener

There is no difference between extremism and terrorism? 😕 please explain the difference.

My neighbor is extremist. Doesn’t want his son marrying out of their religion. Should we call him terrorist?

LOL. Some of you make me laugh hard.

Hmm

The Taliban of 2021 look very different, on TV news clips, from the Taliban of the late 1990s. For one, the quality of telecast has no doubt improved but so has the visual getup of the Afghan militant outfit.

Their weapons look brand new and shining; their Humvee or Humvee type vehicles are in perfect running order; the clothes they wear look clean and new; their neat coiffure a significant departure from the tousled looks of yore.

In 2016, Forbes listed Taliban as the fifth richest of the 10 'Terrorist' organisations that they had featured. ISIS had a turnover then of 2 billion USD and was top dog, Taliban at number five had a modest annual turnover of $400 million.

Forbes listed Taliban's primary sources of revenue as drug trafficking, protection money and donations, and this was 2016 when it was not even the dominant force in Afghanistan.

According to a NATO confidential report accessed by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty the annual budget of the Taliban in financial year 2019-20 had been $1.6 Billion, a 400 per cent increase in four years when compared to the Forbes figures of 2016.

can understnd supporting countries view

Originally posted by: MujheMaarjaneDo

Leftists: Don't call Islamic terrorism "Islamic terrorism", it is just terrorism, it has no religion.

Also Leftists: Hindutva terrorism.

Thank you for pointing out the hypocrisy.

Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi

My neighbor is extremist. Doesn’t want his son marrying out of their religion. Should we call him terrorist?

LOL. Some of you make me laugh hard.

Your neighbor is neither an extremist or a terrorist.....he would be an extremist if he goes around saying that no one should marry out of religion because his religion is the best and tries to impose his opinion on others......but he is just wanting it for his own son.....he would be a terrorist if he got so mad at the idea of his son marrying in another religion..that he tries to intimidate/hurt/kill the people of other religions.....there is a clear difference...

😆

Word Count: 1

Aahh! The many ways and words of communism...😎

If Hindus really love their religion they need to stop defending the Hindutva gangs . Hindutva is an assault to Hinduism .

Originally posted by: elim

If Hindus really love their religion they need to stop defending the Hindutva gangs . Hindutva is an assault to Hinduism .

Religion is not a problem....it is the people who are misinterpreting the religion who are the problem....the people who are misusing the religion to gain control politically are the problem...