SRK is 'Urvashi Rautela" of the 90s - Page 2

Originally posted by: tapori

Probabilities are endless. I was requesting for a fact-check to understand the truth. Not an opinionated defense. 😆

Do you know how many government officials exist? And how many get to meet the prime minister? That too in those days. For me that sounds like a big deal.

Almost every civilian officer and senior Army personnel have pics with PM .But whatever

In that case, Riteish Deshmukh should've been the new superstar. 😆

I don't know if SRK got his start because of (laughing) Indira Gandhi's recommendation. I swear I'm now thinking of Don Corleone making an offer he can't refuse 😆. 

Then SRK should be pissed that Mrs Gandhi couldn't find anyone more mainstream than the producer of Maya Memsaab or Aziz Mirza or Vivek Vaswani. 

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

In that case, Riteish Deshmukh should've been the new superstar. 😆

I don't know if SRK got his start because of (laughing) Indira Gandhi's recommendation. I swear I'm now thinking of Don Corleone making an offer he can't refuse 😆. 

Then SRK should be pissed that Mrs Gandhi couldn't find anyone more mainstream than the producer of Maya Memsaab or Aziz Mirza or Vivek Vaswani. 

All I see is a few ridiculous strawman arguments here.😆

Did you even watch the video? It questions if he had contacts; and contrasts him with Irrfan who started around the same time but needed 15 years to get a leading role! Again, it's only talking about the break, and not the ensuing stardom all the while acknowledging the degrees nepotism works vary.

Originally posted by: tapori

All I see is a few ridiculous strawman arguments here.😆

Did you even watch the video? It questions if he had contacts; and contrasts him with Irrfan who started around the same time but needed 15 years to get a leading role! Again, it's only talking about the break, and not the ensuing stardom all the while acknowledging the degrees nepotism works vary.

Strawman argument = making up a nonexistent issue in order to derail debate.

That whole contrasting SRK and Irfan is in itself strawman argument to make it seem SRK got there because of nepotism. 

It AND your suggestion of the same are the ludicrous claims here. You didn't like the fallacies of your argument being pointed out, so you try to pooh-pooh them. 😆

My statements stand:

If as JS suggested, a connection with Indira Gandhi was got SRK started, then he'd have done much better than the movies he starred in the beginning of his career. He got where he is because of relentless hustling, hard work, talent, and a bit of luck. 

Irfan is a wonderful actor. But he didn't hustle as much as SRK. That's a part of every job. You can't wait for the world to come and invite you in.

Originally posted by: Trisolaris

I wouldn’t believe a word out of Dhruv Rathee’s mouth, dude’s got no credibility. 

Why is that ? Why do you think he has no credibility ?

So are those people implying that everyone is stupid but them ? It's the audience ,his business acumen,charisma and hardwor that lifted SRK up to this position. 

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

😆 Projecting much?

Strawman argument = making up a nonexistent issue in order to derail debate.

That whole contrasting SRK and Irfan is in itself strawman argument to make it seem SRK got there because of nepotism. 

It AND your suggestion of the same are the ludicrous claims here. You didn't like the fallacies of your argument being pointed out, so you try to pooh-pooh them. 😆

My statements stand:

If as JS suggested, a connection with Indira Gandhi was got SRK started, then he'd have done much better than the movies he starred in the beginning of his career. He got where he is because of relentless hustling, hard work, talent, and a bit of luck. 

Irfan is a wonderful actor. But he didn't hustle as much as SRK. That's a part of every job. You can't wait for the world to come and invite you in.

Lot of words to make:

1. false assumptions about me

2. incorrect assertion that comparing SRK's start with Irrfan on the topic of nepotism is a strawman argument. All the while bringing Don Corleone, Riteish Deshmukh and Indira calling (with laughter) into the thread. 🤣

Itni der mein toh video dekh lete jitne mein type kiya 😃

SRK was youngest most beautiful in 90s?

Originally posted by: JackSparrowcraz

SRK had political connections before doing films.

Riiiiiiiight. So did Amitabh Bachchan. And now our Canadian Deshbhakt Mr Posterboy of Cow Dung.

Never heard you cry about that. It's okay, we understand it's hard to see Shahrukh KHAN become the richest actor in the world.

Jal rahi hai na? Jalalo aur. Aryan ko attack karne sey SRK ki success nahi change hogi.

Originally posted by: you2

SRK is back! A 500 cr hit wouldn't have done for him,what this misadventure by BJP has done.People from his own community,who may have been upset with him for not standing up for them publicly..now feel as protective as ever.

I myself had given up any hope of his revival.

Now I think that this his second innings and he will be bigger and better than ever.This is the destiny of King Khan

BJP made another career..that of Priyanka Gandhi.Whether she deserves or not.She grabbed the moment and like a true politician ran with it.

Exactly what they were expecting him to stand for?

😆