The hypocrisy in the treatment of Ruhi versus Armaan - Page 19

Originally posted by: Vanyaa

Because then people defending them won't stop till there is a verdict.

Anyway we already know what's happening it's not our job to convince everyone, if someone wants to defend them they can use all the tactics but won't hear logic.

We don't need a judge to make it clear to us what we can see and come to a conclusion with our minds as to what is happening in the track.

Last season, court gave a verdict that Akshara was bacha chor but they still didn't believe it, people believe what they want to believe

Originally posted by: Vanyaa

Yess hell even I come up to some discussion that court also took wrong decision 😑 😒.

Anyway the bio parents have to ultimately lose in front of the besttt motherjii fatherjii, can't do much. The show must go on.

For people obsessed with bloodline considering they add one scene in every important event from season 1 to season 4, they keep showing bacha chori as a means to an end

If the child is attached to kidnappers, it is called Stockholm syndrome

Originally posted by: WhimsicalMind

Last season, court gave a verdict that Akshara was bacha chor but they still didn't believe it, people believe what they want to believe

Exactly 💯, people wouldn't believe what is truth but only go with what they want to be true.

Last season we have already seen that, mayne that's why I don't have much hope this time lol atleast last time it was said through court that what happened was wrong thus time I don't think we are even getting that.

Originally posted by: WhimsicalMind

For people obsessed with bloodline considering they add one scene in every important event from season 1 to season 4, they keep showing bacha chori as a means to an end

If the child is attached to kidnappers, it is called Stockholm syndrome

Can you think how much people would be thrashed if something like this happens in real life lol.

Obviously a child would be attached to people he knew his entire life but does that mean these people were right all along.

Originally posted by: Vanyaa

I can't take responsibility of every single person, a layman could say bachcha chori but I always from the beginning have said it's kidnapping and they both are kidnappers.

So how is it proved wrong?

Legal terms toh abhi aaye nhi h, I posted in the simplest way, a child of 7 years who knows English could understand it so I thought a person with average IQ would be able to decode it.

Anyway if you want to remain ignorant and defend your beloved ML, that's your issue.

I would have continue this argument if I could function at your level of delusion, but sorry I don't.

Remain ignorant and defend him, all I can do is write facts and law of this country my job isnt to convince you.

When did o defend armaan ??? I said he did not steal baby… neither kidnapped him!!!!😃😃

Oh Ho… aap Ho!! Block unblock ka khel!!😃😃😃😃

Pehle yo I don’t know sirat or her clan!!! I know arohi and her daughter!!!!

Second… no one is defending armasn for taking the baby from rohit…. But he cannot b blamed for stealing the baby!!!

Next, when armaan was with ruhi while married to abhira… everyone mostly blamed hun…. Makes made him say sorry yo everyone… per pakad pakad kar…. Even to ruhi!!!! Ruhi ka sorry kahsn hai??? She even after all that went to blackmail armasn…. To difference to crate kar diya makers ne ruhi and armasn ke character mrin Yahan oer!!!

If u r quoting my post… specifically…. What does that mean????😃😃😃😃😃😃

And after quoting when I replied and u don’t have an answer…. U come around ki u don’t want to discuss only!!!! Bhai did I ask u to quote me!??

U openly declared last gen when u had no answers to my post…. That u r blocking me…and I accepted…. I never quote u after that!!!!

From a Legal stand point , arman and rohit are criminals . One for "kidnapping" the baby from his mother , the other for accepting the baby , fraudsters for false birth certificate , medical records of the child , doctors and nurses accomplice in the crimes ..paying off the nurse to keep her from telling the truth ?

Morally & ethically, arman acted out of malicious intent . He let a mother grieve to save his wife from grieving. No different from ruhi . He's being greedy & selfish..his family is now complete , his wife is happy , he got his mother's validation so ruhis pain is inconsequential ...how's it different from ruhi ? Coz he is doing all this with occasional tears?

Arman realizing his mistakes is a moot point as he continues to makes those mistakes and severe than the previous ones ..Arman can keep his good intentions to himself of involving rohit ruhi in their baby's functions & life coz he doesn't intend to come forward and tell the truth ..his intention is limited to throwing bread crumbs to ease off his guilt, that too surfaces sometimes..

Originally posted by: India_TV

If u r quoting my post… specifically…. What does that mean????😃😃😃😃😃😃

And after quoting when I replied and u don’t have an answer…. U come around ki u don’t want to discuss only!!!! Bhai did I ask u to quote me!??

U openly declared last gen when u had no answers to my post…. That u r blocking me…and I accepted…. I never quote u after that!!!!