What a creativity - Page 11

Originally posted by: Rdigest

This is purely bad direction and creativity 😂

rono through out in KD is a silent guy. He barely reacts. He is sensitive but doesn’t express. All his talks, laughs and frustrations are exclusively for sai in their room. He stays like that through out. Here they play football with virats character and we get confused 😐

I really hope that they have not gone down the suicide route🙏 after all our hue/cry from weeks in advance if they still overlook it and show suicide it'll make me really very very disheartened n i will need to start detaching myself from the show. Because KD had some terrible drama around Shruti/divorce once and shruti coming back, virat not being there for his own childs birth, ignoring his pregnant wife for another woman etc etc. Its unbearable.. i cant watch that shit

If they do listen about no suicide then maybe i can be hopeful that they will also listen to us about treating the shruti/divorce/pregnancy and those nonsense tracks from KD also differently or omitting it altogether.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

Ok May be zidd is the wrong word 😳. She will be broken for sure. But to take ones life it has to be despair or ‘opposite of despair’ ( not sure what) that strong intention to prove him wrong and make herself clear. When her aaba died she took the extreme step out of despair. Will she be feeling that now? Both cases she is extremely hurt, but what emotion drives her to take this step? May be it is not zidd but she is not doing it as a weak woman. This action will be done with strength is what I think.

In KD we have a monologue of hers which I didn’t understand. Hope here we get one.

corrct me if I am wrong

I didn’t watch from the beginning and therefore not aware of why before but like you asked what would drive her to it, if its’s not an accident? What would put her in a position to take such a drastic step?

I don’t usually speculate and just wait to see what happens on the day but as this has been on the cards for sometime now and talked about for sometime, it makes me wonder why as Sai is deals with everything head on despite being badly let down and misunderstood.

Whatever happens I hope it is all dealt with sensitively in such times.

Originally posted by: laksh

He can feel insecured but she can’t? He can be possessive but she can’t? He can get jealous for nothing and she can’t feel jealous for valid reasons? The lady stands near their door in the night time, barges into their room any time of the day even when the door is closed and she should understand him because he doesn’t think that way. What about all his past actions, what is she supposed to make out of those? This guy has come to meet Sai in their house, the whole family knows, Pakhi said she was taking tea for them, the door was open, yet he feels that the guy has some feelings for Sai and feels that he had the audacity to come to meet her. He asks her what was she doing alone with him in their room? I understand that he wasn’t in his senses and didn’t even know what he was talking or doing, and yet he calls Sai nasamajh and has called badtameez. It is him who is nasamajh and acting without tameez to a guest. Sai has been showing her samajhdaari many a times ignoring him and Pakhi, she has walked out of the room when Pakhi demanded to talk alone, she walked out towards balcony when she found her husband was being fed by his ex and even asked them to go on a trip even after she saw how cheap Pakhi was behaving asking for his dresses to be picked in her suitcase. If Virat was in Sai’s position, I can’t even imagine what he would have done. He would have gone mad long ago. Sai expressed her displeasure as soon they got married, she herself didn’t know why she acted that way but didn’t he ask her why should it be a problem to her since their marriage was a deal one, why should it be a problem to her if he has feelings for Pakhi.

He won’t be able to hear Sai speaking any such thing. I really wish Sai asks him why should it bother him even if she has feelings for Ajinkya and tell him if that is not what he once asked her.

@laksh I was just thinking about what you had written in @bold. I'm trying hard to delve into his thinking. In the initial days of his marriage, he did criticize Sai for feeling bad when he talks to Pakhi - and Sai denied it saying that nothing is more important than her father's dream. A couple of days later, he himself asked if Sai doesn't like it when he speaks to Pakhi - to which Sai replies "mujhe farak nahi padta" and he seems to believe it(& be a little disappointed with it). Since then, he seems to have made up his mind that Sai and Pakhi are at loggerheads due to personality clash - and that's why he makes the dumbass Ladakh plan. When Sai called him out on using his pati haq on her whilst being in love with Pakhi - I think somewhere he knows the validity of Sai's expectations and sees the justification in her anger - which is why the aftermath of the family reveal doesn't turn into a huge fight. He is hurt that she revealed this to the family, but is not angry or arrogant about it. Even in the episode where he accepts that he is not committed to anyone anymore - he wants to know if him talking to Pakhi affects her because till now he doesn't belive he is important enough to Sai for it to actually bother her. So can we say that he is not being a hypocrite consciously? Sometimes we ourselves behave like a hypocrite without realising - but when somebody calls us out, we reflect and change our behaviour - that is the mark of an honest person. I could be missing a lot of pieces here - so do correct me if I'm wrong. I don't remember all the details but did he try to maintain distance with Pakhi after that atleast?

I'm also appalled at his inability to put two and two together - when he was surprised at Sai's mudda of Pakhi being a roadblock between them. Being unable to gauge her feelings is different, but didn't she raise the same mudda during the vaada reveal to the family? Why is he acting surprised? I'm clueless as to what went on in his dumb head after the vaada reveal.

As for Virakhi, whatever be his reasons, it doesn't absolve him of his behaviour with Pakhi. My mind zones out whenever any thing is about them - because they act without any common sense or even basic decorum. I really get uncomfortable with the familiarity with which they behave with each other, the liberties they take with each other. It is disconcerting to see Virat going into Pakhi's room without knocking - either to speak to her or during a fight, allowing Pakhi to keep her hand on his shoulder, holding her hand etc - it borders on being inappropriate, even if we take Sai out of the picture. Contrast that with his behaviour towards Sai when she refuses to not take part in fresher's program - he behaves in an abnoxious way during the alta episode - there is absolutely no introspection on why he is going overboard at Sai's innocent actions which is something every college girl will do - even as I understand that he was confused and unable to comprehend his budding feelings. He only gets mollified when he learns that Sai has applied alta. Ssince then he is making visible efforts to not be controlling and let his go of his jealousy - although he succeeds only partially.

P.S: As usual my post may not any conclusion and is a just an endless pondering😆

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

@laksh I was just thinking about what you had written in @bold. I'm trying hard to delve into his thinking. In the initial days of his marriage, he did criticize Sai for feeling bad when he talks to Pakhi - and Sai denied it saying that nothing is more important than her father's dream. A couple of days later, he himself asked if Sai doesn't like it when he speaks to Pakhi - to which Sai replies "mujhe farak nahi padta" and he seems to believe it(& be a little disappointed with it). Since then, he seems to have made up his mind that Sai and Pakhi are at loggerheads due to personality clash - and that's why he makes the dumbass Ladakh plan. When Sai called him out on using his pati haq on her whilst being in love with Pakhi - I think somewhere he knows the validity of Sai's expectations and sees the justification in her anger - which is why the aftermath of the family reveal doesn't turn into a huge fight. He is hurt that she revealed this to the family, but is not angry or arrogant about it. Even in the episode where he accepts that he is not committed to anyone anymore - he wants to know if him talking to Pakhi affects her because till now he doesn't belive he is important enough to Sai for it to actually bother her. So can we say that he is not being a hypocrite consciously? Sometimes we ourselves behave like a hypocrite without realising - but when somebody calls us out, we reflect and change our behaviour - that is the mark of an honest person. I could be missing a lot of pieces here - so do correct me if I'm wrong. I don't remember all the details but did he try to maintain distance with Pakhi after that atleast?

I'm also appalled at his inability to put two and two together - when he was surprised at Sai's mudda of Pakhi being a roadblock between them. Being unable to gauge her feelings is different, but didn't she raise the same mudda during the vaada reveal to the family? Why is he acting surprised? I'm clueless as to what went on in his dumb head after the vaada reveal.

As for Virakhi, whatever be his reasons, it doesn't absolve him of his behaviour with Pakhi. My mind zones out whenever any thing is about them - because they act without any common sense or even basic decorum. I really get uncomfortable with the familiarity with which they behave with each other, the liberties they take with each other. It is disconcerting to see Virat going into Pakhi's room without knocking - either to speak to her or during a fight, allowing Pakhi to keep her hand on his shoulder, holding her hand etc - it borders on being inappropriate, even if we take Sai out of the picture. Contrast that with his behaviour towards Sai when she refuses to not take part in fresher's program - he behaves in an abnoxious way during the alta episode - there is absolutely no introspection on why he is going overboard at Sai's innocent actions which is something every college girl will do - even as I understand that he was confused and unable to comprehend his budding feelings. He only gets mollified when he learns that Sai has applied alta. Ssince then he is making visible efforts to not be controlling and let his go of his jealousy - although he succeeds only partially.

P.S: As usual my post may not any conclusion and is a just an endless pondering😆

I don't remember all the details but did he try to maintain distance with Pakhi after that atleast?

Bold: This certainly got me go back and think over.

Did Virat maintain distance then onwards?

Yes mostly except the two incidents that irked the fandom and we all discussed unendingly during those episodes.

when he was planning the secret surprise for Sai’s birthday. His hand holding and whispering standing too close looked cringeworthy.

Second when he was shouting at her for causing injury to Sai. Here also the proximity and handholding did not look appropriate.

Barring these I think he displayed a detached attitude towards Pakhi and also got sarcastic couple of times..

Virat’s miffed expressions voiced without covering with his usual softness at the dining table on Sai’s birthday night was worthy of applause..but

Again he spoilt the fun by saying sorry for celebrating Sai’s birthday when Pakhi threatened to leave the house.

On the whole,I do believe that he has moved on but still not satisfied with his wavering ways..case in point I didnt like his sorry to Pakhi for birthday celebration! Sai didn’t hear that otherwise she would have felt disheartened and questioned him also..

Just my thoughts on reading yours.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

rono through out in KD is a silent guy. He barely reacts. He is sensitive but doesn’t express. All his talks, laughs and frustrations are exclusively for sai in their room. He stays like that through out. Here they play football with virats character and we get confused 😐

That’s who Virat is actually. A silent guy who is sensitive but who cannot control his emotions. Is quite expressive, can see that with, can’t control his emotions wherever he is when it comes to Sai. Makes more sense than what they showed in Rono because emotions can burst out anywhere a person is, not just in their room. The difference that many find in Virat saying he is not Rono is the reason for this kind of behaviour from Virat. The more he is attached to Sai, the more his expectations from her and the more are his reactions arising out of hurt/disappointment/jealousy. He has been in his character always.

Originally posted by: ltelidevara

I don't remember all the details but did he try to maintain distance with Pakhi after that atleast?

Bold: This certainly got me went back and think over.

Did Virat maintained distance then onwards?

Yes mostly except the two incidents that irked the fandom and we all discussed unendingly.

One is when he is planning the secret surprise of birthday. His hand holding and whispering standing too close looked cringeworthy.

Second when he is shouting at her for causing injury to Sai. Here also the proximity and handholding did not look appropriate.

Barring these I think he displayed a detached attitude towards Pakhi and also got sarcastic couple of times..

Virat’s miffed expressions voiced without covering with his usual softness at the dining table on Sai’s birthday night was worthy of applause..but

Again he spoilt the fun by saying sorry for celebrating Sai’s birthday when Pakhi threatened to leave the house.

On the whole,I do believe that he has moved on but still not satisfied with his wavering ways..case in point I didnt like his sorry to Pakhi for birthday celebration! Sai didn’t hear that otherwise she would have felt disheartened and questioned him also..

Just my thoughts on reading yours.

How could I forget the infamous dinner hand holding?

That makes him a hypocrite. Even after knowing what Sai feels about his closeness with Pakhi, inspite of Sai making it clear that he cannot harbour feelings for Pakhi AND exert his right on Sai, he has not introspected on his past actions or on how his actions may have been perceived by her. Other issues can be overlooked as part of their relationship dynamics, but not this. This is serious. If he behaves with such callousness, but expects Sai to not even speak to her mates, what else can one say except to call him a hypocrite!

Sai should call him out for that I'm this track - she should remind him about all the time he allowed Pakhi to not keep the maryada of the relationship.

We know that he has moved on, but his familiarity with Pakhi continues - be it when he is excited, indifferent or even angry with her. That is the troubling part - the familiarity. Frankly, I don't want to say it but- it almost seems like they still have some strange connection. How is it possible that a man who has grown up in an orthodox family, not know the difference between what is acceptable behaviour and what is not?

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

How could I forget the infamous dinner hand holding?

That makes him a hypocrite. Even after knowing what Sai feels about his closeness with Pakhi, inspite of Sai making it clear that he cannot harbour feelings for Pakhi AND exert his right on Sai, he has not introspected on his past actions or on how his actions may have been perceived by her. Other issues can be overlooked as part of their relationship dynamics, but not this. This is serious. If he behaves with such callousness, but expects Sai to not even speak to her mates, what else can one say except to call him a hypocrite!

Sai should call him out for that I'm this track - she should remind him about all the time he allowed Pakhi to not keep the maryada of the relationship.

We know that he has moved on, but his familiarity with Pakhi continues - be it when he is excited, indifferent or even angry with her. That is the troubling part - the familiarity. Frankly, I don't want to say it but- it almost seems like they still have some strange connection. How is it possible that a man who has grown up in an orthodox family, not know the difference between what is acceptable behaviour and what is not?

Even if Sai calls herself so..it cannot redeem Virat of what he thought about the woman who is clear on the relationship she shared with the friend he is beating... He cannot be redeemed for embarassing Sai for life...embarassing for her to face any of her friends.. He needs to have some anger management classes..at all costs.. he can't handle things when it comes to Sai..harms other people physically for Sai and also harms Sai physically and with words when he thinks she has hurt him..

Originally posted by: asmi_joya

Even if Sai calls herself so..it cannot redeem Virat of what he thought about the woman who is clear on the relationship she shared with friend he is beating... He cannot be redeemed for embarassing Sai for life...embarassing for her to face any of her friends.. He needs to have some anger management classes..at all costs.. he can't handle things when it comes to Sai..harms other people physically for Sai and also harms Sai physically and with words when he thinks she has hurt him..

I really hope that people dont start comparing Virat's reaction about Sai-ajinkya to Sai's reaction about virat- pp because they are poles apart. Also the physical assault is too much. He is a police officer. They need to stop showing him lose his bearings and manhandling people. He is the same guy that had a problem with unnecessary use of force against a criminal like jagtap n vitthal until they were convicted and also was like - our job is to only uphold the law , not to announce verdict or take the law in our own hands. I know these situations are not same because its more personal/emotional. But still the way, this Virat is not the original Virat they showed us. Its like he gets "dauras" of madness. the way they write Virat is utter rubbish sometimes. They really need to stop n think about what they are showing.