Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP
https://x.com/AskAnshul/status/1767913674268922211?s=20
Another reason why CAA needs to be the way it is currently…
More importantly, people need to stop conflating CAA w/ NRC
Neither law touches Indian muslims
Originally posted by: Clochette
It is interesting that only one member raised doubts about the value of CAA planned to be handled - which is, indeed, as much doubtfull as are the protests from other political sides.
Why even believe those who use the (legal and illegal) immigrants' issues for their own political agendas whichever the own political inclination is?
Religious persecution? How many with other motives can feign that by stressing problems because of following another religion than the Islamic one?
How many Muslims indeed are persecuted because they follow the real base of Islam and not the indoctrination of misused Islam.
It's like shown in Dunki...those kind of laws are made to exclude people who don't fit the political agendas but still leave loopholes for - among others - criminal elements by just lying.
Just - again - from the viewpoint of someone who doesn't live in India but also in a country with a flow of migrants, which I perceive as a social problem - far too often (mis)used by politics.
Please don't do your number out here! Those who indulge in jihad, grooming gangs & so on cite islamic texts as the basis of what they do, and mainstream muslim clerics at large have not refuted any of it. That's why there are trafficking problems not just in Pakistan, Bangladesh, even India but also in Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and all over Europe
It's amazing how so many muslims "misunderstand" their faith: one doesn't usually see that of people of other faiths
Not 98% but definitely the bulk of it. Why would companies/corporations go to opposition parties w/ money to get their regulatory favors done?
Not corporation or companies but Anti India elements.
BJP got less than 50% of their donations from electoral bonds, but Congress specially DMK got 98% of it from that.
So yes even if BJP got more in money but wayyy less in % than rest of the opposition.
Just one state parties have got wayy more % of electoral bonds than the Central Govt.
So yes it won't hurt the govt as their % is not even 50% of their donations unlike other parties.
For those who is crying about Electoral bonds and blaming the govt
No Adani or Reliance on the list for electoral bonds. Meanwhile, who is on the list? Congress loving Bajaj. 🙏 Making this list public will actually expose Congress a lot more than its supporters are equipped to handle.
I'll discuss the election bonds in the Elections thread, rather than hijack this one....
Originally posted by: Palak2812
No Adani or Reliance on the list for electoral bonds. Meanwhile, who is on the list? Congress loving Bajaj. 🙏 Making this list public will actually expose Congress a lot more than its supporters are equipped to handle.
No Adani Ambani? What r u saying ! No Tata too.
Ab kaunse Gujjus ko gaali denge? Koi to honge list me new targets
https://x.com/TimesAlgebraIND/status/1768353038434238918?s=20
and their problem is ? 🤣🤣🤣. Not that they can oppose constitutional laws of India 🤣🤣
https://x.com/MeghUpdates/status/1768298867802697938?s=20
Shouldn’t they be focused on basic human rights for women. Progress. Eradication of terrorism. Etc ! And Islamic states really want to have opinions on another countries constitution in the name of secularism ? 🤣🤣🤣. Wah wah.
comment:
p_commentcount