Writer of Priyanka Chopra's biography calls her a TOTAL FRAUD - Page 8

Created

Last reply

Replies

143

Views

24k

Users

47

Likes

436

Frequent Posters

Manavi_kesari thumbnail
IPL 2024 Participants 3 Thumbnail IPL 2023 Participants 3 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 2 years ago
#71

Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi

PC is quite fake. Dislike is understandable.
And SRk fans ka dislike bhi thik hai. Expected.

But lot of these hate also comes from other places. Jai Hind bola tha ek baar. Padosiyo ka toh tabse rona chal raha hai. šŸ¤£
Meltdown is hilarious at this point.


Ya PC supported Indian army n india being in bw , said jai hind too . how how how šŸ˜­


Edited by Medha_Sree - 2 years ago
jasminerahul thumbnail
Anniversary 19 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 2 years ago
#72

What fake marriage?what reason did she give for surrogacy?


Originally posted by: -PD-

PC is fake.. from fake marriage to her so called reasons for surrogacy... She tries to gain publicity from everything but looks her marriage and baby gave her more negative publicity than positive..

IAmLuvBolly thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 2 years ago
#73

Originally posted by: crispsy


1. She slept with SRK

2. She got married to SRK secretly and owns property in Dubai.


This would work if she was hated by only SRK fans. But I think a lot of people dislike her. I definitely went through a phase of being an SRK hater and I still hated PC too for reasons other than SRK. I just mocked her for sticking her pinky in SRKā€™s pocket šŸ˜†.

I remember when she first moved to LA for Quantico she posted a picture of herself shopping at the produce department of a grocery store and captioned it something like sheā€™s never seen so many fruits and she didnā€™t know what to pick šŸ™„. Sheā€™s from India, one of the largest producer of fruits in the world. Itā€™s stupid fake things like this that makes people troll her. There have been discrepancies about her time in the U.S. as an exchange student. She claimed her nose was original on The View. She complained about lack of roles for brown people in Hollywood but had no problems using a prosthetic to play a northeast Indian Mary Kim. Her statement about why she chose surrogacy was all sorts of wrong. Iā€™m surprised she hasnā€™t received more backlash for that. As a non Indian I try not to get into political discussions about India here, but thereā€™s a lot of tension (putting it very mildly) between pro Modi groups and minorities in India these days. So when she chooses not to use her platform to address the issues within India but says something about other parts of the world itā€™s hard for people to take her seriously.

1194442 thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#74

I don't know what I find more cringeworthy between this clip and the other one back in 2016 where she's urging Americans to exercise their right to vote.


Why couldn't she just say something simple like a normal person to show her support for Ukraine?


Why does it always, ALWAYS have to be a high voltage, 500 watt "appeal" that easily makes people's ears bleed with pure cringe?


THIS IS MY DIRECT APPEAL FROM ME TO THE WORLD LEADERS, DO SOMETHING. šŸ˜µ

IAmLuvBolly thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 2 years ago
#75

Originally posted by: jasminerahul

What fake marriage?what reason did she give for surrogacy?



The marriage being fake is pure speculation probably because no one really saw her dating Nick. May or may not be true.

She said in a statement that due to their busy schedules her and Nick chose surrogacy. Reality is her age probably made it difficult for her to get pregnant but she didnā€™t want to say that. Instead sheā€™s letting the world know that she canā€™t take a year off to get pregnant so sheā€™s paying someone else to do it for her. All she had to do was shut up and not give an explanation and no one would have even blinked. But no, she had to make sure people knew it wasnā€™t about her age or other potential medical issues.

sev.puri thumbnail
Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Anniversary 4 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#76

Originally posted by: IAmLuvBolly


The marriage being fake is pure speculation probably because no one really saw her dating Nick. May or may not be true.

She said in a statement that due to their busy schedules her and Nick chose surrogacy. Reality is her age probably made it difficult for her to get pregnant but she didnā€™t want to say that. Instead sheā€™s letting the world know that she canā€™t take a year off to get pregnant so sheā€™s paying someone else to do it for her. All she had to do was shut up and not give an explanation and no one would have even blinked. But no, she had to make sure people knew it wasnā€™t about her age or other potential medical issues.

So a woman is perhaps insecure telling the whole world she might be too old to have kids and may well have struggled to get pregnant and so lied about why she opted for surrogacy. Whatā€™s the big deal? People really need to get off their high horse. Celebs lie about getting work done all the time. Big freakinā€™ deal.

cougarTown thumbnail
Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail Anniversary 10 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 years ago
#77

Originally posted by: sev.puri

So a woman is perhaps insecure telling the whole world she might be too old to have kids and may well have struggled to get pregnant and so lied about why she opted for surrogacy. Whatā€™s the big deal? People really need to get off their high horse. Celebs lie about getting work done all the time. Big freakinā€™ deal.


When you are the "Global Icon" you can influence impressionable minds. Promoting surrogacy simply on basis of not having enough time to get pregnant for 9 months is highly problematic (if that is the case which i really hope it wasn't) You are hiring a woman to go through so much simply because she does not have enough economic means and you on the other hand have so much that you would rather hire than do it yourself. What if complications occur? what if the one who is carrying the child ends up getting her life at risk? You may end up putting another woman on such high risks even at risk of losing her life or not being able to give birth again, simply because you did not have enough time..

Edited by cougarTown - 2 years ago
Nandini_goyal thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 years ago
#78

she has been a fraud since day 1, her appeals on sns are written by a pr team, and then

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psWV9GdEgzo

sev.puri thumbnail
Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Anniversary 4 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#79

Originally posted by: cougarTown


When you are the "Global Icon" you can influence impressionable minds. Promoting surrogacy simply on basis of not having enough time to get pregnant for 9 months is highly problematic (if that is the case which i really hope it wasn't) You are hiring a woman to go through so much simply because she does not have enough economic means and you on the other hand have so much that you would rather hire than do it yourself. What if complications occur? what if the one who is carrying the child ends up getting her life at risk? You may end up putting another woman on such high risks even at risk of losing her life or not being able to give birth again, simply because you did not have enough time..

This to me just sounds like a whole different debate on surrogacy. I can only assume she went through a legal process whichever country the surrogate was from. Those that sign on are well aware of all the risks and benefits that come with it. Thatā€™s life man. Maybe for the surrogate itā€™s easier than working 2/3 jobs for the rest of their lives? Or better than creating an account on OnlyFans? Lol
Rich people gonna do rich things, I donā€™t know what to tell you. šŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™€ļø

IAmLuvBolly thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 2 years ago
#80

Originally posted by: cougarTown


When you are the "Global Icon" you can influence impressionable minds. Promoting surrogacy simply on basis of not having enough time to get pregnant for 9 months is highly problematic (if that is the case which i really hope it wasn't) You are hiring a woman to go through so much simply because she does not have enough economic means and you on the other hand have so much that you would rather hire than do it yourself. What if complications occur? what if the one who is carrying the child ends up getting her life at risk? You may end up putting another woman on such high risks even at risk of losing her life or not being able to give birth again, simply because you did not have enough time..



What he said šŸ‘šŸ½. Iā€™ll just add that as someone who fancies herself a global icon and a feminist this could have been a great opportunity for her to address age and biological insecurities a lot of career oriented women face. Or like I said above she could have just announced the arrival of her child and left all the details out. Announcing that you paid someone else to carry your child because you didnā€™t have time to get pregnant reeks of shallowness and snobbery.

Top