Is Pooja Bhatt trying to shade Gangubai here? - Page 20

Originally posted by: pathaka

It totally does …

The real question is …WHO is hurt …🧐

Only those who take advantage do. The rise of falsehood is the downfall of realism. And there is no greater pain, than the sting of illusion.

I don't believe producers would be ok with buying tickets except perhaps for one or two days as part of marketing budget.

At the end of the day, producers also have to answer to financiers. They won't fund movies if all they're going to see are losses with some public waah-waahs.

Not to mention getting into trouble with the taxman.

So the numbers are likely accurate... more or less.

But I don't buy for a minute POOJA BHATT was unaware of how her tweets would be interpreted. Not only that, on the off chance she made a mistake, she would've either clarified or deleted the tweet. It's still there, right?

To blame Deepika PR for this is ludicrous. She's not above using it, but unless anyone is suggesting Deepika got Pooja to do it, she would simply be taking advantage of the situation. It's still Pooja who started the trouble.

Pooja didnt post a shady tweet?

Will Kangu run with it? KRK?

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

I don't believe producers would be ok with buying tickets except perhaps for one or two days as part of marketing budget.

At the end of the day, producers also have to answer to financiers. They won't fund movies if all they're going to see are losses with some public waah-waahs.

But I don't buy for a minute POOJA BHATT was unaware of how her tweets would be interpreted. Not only that, on the off chance she made a mistake, she would've either clarified or deleted the tweet. It's still there, right?

To blame Deepika PR for this is ludicrous. Yeah, she is using it, but unless anyone is suggesting Deepika got Pooja to do it, she is simply taking advantage of the situation. It's still Pooja who started the trouble.

Agreed. She did it on purpose and she was sly about it. So many people have interpreted in a particular way, unless we're all unintelligent and only the nepotism nancy's can understand what she really meant?

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

Only those who take advantage do. The rise of falsehood is the downfall of realism. And there is no greater pain, than the sting of illusion.

Truer words have never been spoken 😇

What’s debatable is who exactly is facing this “sting of illusion” and has built this “falsehood” to “ignore reality” …and is “taking advantage” of a narrative to suit a certain purpose

Originally posted by: pathaka

Truer words have never been spoken 😇

What’s debatable is who exactly is facing this “sting of illusion” and has built this “falsehood” to “ignore reality” …and is “taking advantage” of a narrative to suit a certain purpose

Pathaka, regardless of who's taking advantage of the narrative, it was started by Pooja, and she hasn't clarified or deleted.

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

🤣

This is what I have been saying....if this is sibling rivalry why would she praise Alia to skies and then in 24 hours do a U turn...and even if she did....her tweet won't be in disguise....she would bash it openly....that is the kind of woman she is....just read her tweets....she is a fire cracker...😆

Even if she made sly digs or whatever , a person who flips and does a 180 turn and says the exact opposite of what was interpreted of the “sly dig” is hardly a source to look at for “validation”

If she flips her words that easy , what exactly is she right about and how do we discern it lol…

Kuch bhi

awww Siddy boy...so sweet..❤️

https://twitter.com/sidpmalhotra/status/1497596534770135045?s=20&t=aVZRu-4NugLf2FKl6qloRg

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Pathaka, regardless of who's taking advantage of the narrative, it was started by Pooja, and she hasn't clarified or deleted.

My point exactly

Let’s say we assume pooja took a sly dig

Then she flips and posts glowing tweets of the same film she supposedly digged on

What does that make of her? a coward? A two faced person? damage control over being misinterpreted?
Which would mean she’s not a source to look at for reliability ..who’s to discern what’s she lying about and what’s she speaking the truth about?

Originally posted by: pathaka

My point exactly

Let’s say we assume pooja took a sly dig

Then she flips and posts glowing tweets of the same film she supposedly digged on

What does that make of her? a coward? A two faced person? damage control over being misinterpreted?
Which would mean she’s not a source to look at for reliability ..who’s to discern what’s she lying about and what’s she speaking the truth about?

This is what the Bhatt’s do. Dont forget that they made a living for themselves by creating erotic movies in the 2000’s