Producers of BV wouldn't make the film with Ranveer - Anurag Kashyap - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

55

Views

4.2k

Users

18

Likes

71

Frequent Posters

zehreeli.kheer thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 0 Thumbnail Anniversary 15 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 4 years ago
#11

The sense of entitlement 😆

Casting of BV was likely done somewhere around 2013 or so.. Ranveer hadn't really proven his mettle till that time.. the success of RL was never really fully attributed to him.. So producers not wanting to spend such a huge amount on him was perfectly understandable and justified..

While Ranbir was coming from the fresh the critical success of Rockstar, and commercial successes of Barfi and YJHD.. thus, he was considered more bankable

Matlab anything to prove that the "system" was against Ranveer😆 and the system went for Rajeev over Ranveer😆

Kaya65 thumbnail
Anniversary 4 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 4 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: zara321

this shows that the system worked against ranveer aswell, he was rejected from auditions, he had to give auditions. And the producers of bombay velvet chose to cast the starkid ranbir kapoor over ranveer singh even when the director wanted to cast Ranveer


the producers were willing to put their money on ranbir because he was known for his amazing acting talent/star powers in the years before and not because he was a star kids🤡 that the film was bad and didnt worked at the end it was another story

Edited by Kaya65 - 4 years ago
zara321 thumbnail
Anniversary 19 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 4 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

The sense of entitlement 😆

Casting of BV was likely done somewhere around 2013 or so.. Ranveer hadn't really proven his mettle till that time.. the success of RL was never really fully attributed to him.. So producers not wanting to spend such a huge amount on him was perfectly understandable and justified..

While Ranbir was coming from the fresh the critical success of Rockstar, and commercial successes of Barfi and YJHD.. thus, he was considered more bankable

Matlab anything to prove that the "system" was against Ranveer😆 and the system went for Rajeev over Ranveer😆


With regards to shaitaan, the point is ranveer had to audition and he has been rejected, people think he has had it as easy as starkids who dont have to audition and can just get a movie with their name, i mean they went as far as to say ranveer had the power to take movies away from ssr.


For bombay velvet, anurag was very keen on casting ranveer, he saw the talent ranveer had and there were articles ranveer had started prep for BV coz he thought he was going to get cast in it, but instead the producers said that if he casts ranveer they will not let him make the film. SLB took a chance on ranveer with a big budget film like ramleela, and it paid off, and what did BV prove at the end? That no matter who is casted in it if the film is crap it is never going to work, so it came back to bite them in the end and ranveer got saved from a disaster

Posted: 4 years ago
#14

Are you complaining Zara?😆

I wish they had made BV with Ranveer😆

Trijha thumbnail
Anniversary 7 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: zara321


yeh they chose rajeev over Ranveer, now just imagine if it was ranbir that auditioned, he wouldn't have even had to audition, even just a phonecall would have put him in the movie


Ranbir had already proved his acting by then. And Rajeev too. They wanted an ACTOR and they chose one. Simple.

Maroonporsche thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: zara321





For bombay velvet, anurag was very keen on casting ranveer, he saw the talent ranveer had and there were articles ranveer had started prep for BV coz he thought he was going to get cast in it, but instead the producers said that if he casts ranveer they will not let him make the film. SLB took a chance on ranveer with a big budget film like ramleela, and it paid off, and what did BV prove at the end? That no matter who is casted in it if the film is crap it is never going to work, so it came back to bite them in the end and ranveer got saved from a disaster


Which Producers tho ? Fox or Vikas Bahl or Vikramaditya ? Who picked Ranbir.

zara321 thumbnail
Anniversary 19 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 4 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

Are you complaining Zara?😆

I wish they had made BV with Ranveer😆


not complaining lol, i'm glad ranveer didn't do BV, just posted what Anurag said, these are things that i am not making up, these are things producers and directors are saying themselves about ranveer

zehreeli.kheer thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 0 Thumbnail Anniversary 15 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 4 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: zara321


With regards to shaitaan, the point is ranveer had to audition and he has been rejected, people think he has had it as easy as starkids who dont have to audition and can just get a movie with their name, i mean they went as far as to say ranveer had the power to take movies away from ssr.


For bombay velvet, anurag was very keen on casting ranveer, he saw the talent ranveer had and there were articles ranveer had started prep for BV coz he thought he was going to get cast in it, but instead the producers said that if he casts ranveer they will not let him make the film. SLB took a chance on ranveer with a big budget film like ramleela, and it paid off, and what did BV prove at the end? That no matter who is casted in it if the film is crap it is never going to work, so it came back to bite them in the end and ranveer got saved from a disaster

If Anurag was so keen, he could have found other producers willing to take the risk.. One can't blame anyone for being cautious on who they bet their money on

the producers had full right to play it safe and cast a bankable star for their movie.. How does this prove anything about the system being against Ranveer? matlab kuch bhi

He had it easier than outsiders.. The fact that you have to try so hard to prove that he didn't is actually quite funny😆

zara321 thumbnail
Anniversary 19 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 4 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: T3ja


Ranbir had already proved his acting by then. And Rajeev too. They wanted an ACTOR and they chose one. Simple.


So ranveer didn't prove his acting? with films like BBB, Lootera and ramleela i think he proved he is a good actor, which is why a director like anurag wanted him in the film

zara321 thumbnail
Anniversary 19 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 4 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

If Anurag was so keen, he could have found other producers willing to take the risk.. One can't blame anyone for being cautious on who they bet their money on

the producers had full right to play it safe and cast a bankable star for their movie.. How does this prove anything about the system being against Ranveer? matlab kuch bhi

He had it easier than outsiders.. The fact that you have to try so hard to prove that he didn't is actually quite funny😆


i'm not trying hard, all of these producers and directors are saying themselves what ranveer had to go through, i am just simply posting it here. Anurag described it as Ranveer's struggle, you are free to believe him or not

Edited by zara321 - 4 years ago
Top