Do you believe Sanjay Dutt was innocent? - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

79

Views

6.9k

Users

40

Likes

169

Frequent Posters

desicrowd thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#51
Watched Sanju only for Ranbir...

In no way does the movie encapsulate the actual life of Sanjay or changes my perception of who Sanjay Dutt is, to me he is and will always be a person who had some hand in the blasts... he very well knew and had connections with those people.

As a Mumbaikar will always hate Sanjay and cannot forgive him even if he blames the entire universe for his choice..

Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
Anniversary 6 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#52

Originally posted by: desicrowd

Watched Sanju only for Ranbir...

In no way does the movie encapsulate the actual life of Sanjay or changes my perception of who Sanjay Dutt is, to me he is and will always be a person who had some hand in the blasts... he very well knew and had connections with those people.

As a Mumbaikar will always hate Sanjay and cannot forgive him even if he blames the entire universe for his choice..


How do you know he was involved in Bombay blasts? did you see him do anything? a popular person was made a scapegoat and people like you buy it. If you are so convinced about him being involved then it makes you a traitor and hypocrite for watching this movie, even if it was ranbir, because even ranbir is in full support of glorifying Sanjay, he loves him, all the people who believe Sanjay is a traitor and watched the movie are hypocrites who are only helping in glorifying him further.
Edited by Bollywoodlaver - 6 years ago
mz.gigglez thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#53
Is there any proof he was involved in the attacks?

Just become some labelled him as a terrorrist doesnt mean shit.

And this guy has spent his time in jail with no special treatment for carrying the arms.

Besides that hes not guilty until proven.
Ur-Miserable thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 6 years ago
#54
Sanju is totally fake story, just watched it as a movie and enjoyed it, not drawing any conclusion from it.

Sanjay Dutt himself said he kept that gun because he liked hunting at one interview, hear he was saying he did for his family.
Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
Anniversary 6 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#55

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

Sanju is totally fake story, just watched it as a movie and enjoyed it, not drawing any conclusion from it.

Sanjay Dutt himself said he kept that gun because he liked hunting at one interview, hear he was saying he did for his family.



who said it can't be for both? yes RH tried to present a bit nicer version of him and left out the hunting part, but still doesn't change the fact that he is not a terrorist.
Ur-Miserable thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 6 years ago
#56

Originally posted by: Bollywoodlaver



who said it can't be for both? yes RH tried to present a bit nicer version of him and left out the hunting part, but still doesn't change the fact that he is not a terrorist.



did I called Sanju terrorist??
I don't have any evidence nor I have read all the legal papers regarding his case to come into conclusion whether he is terrorist or he someone caught in circumstances.




I just said Sanju the movie was a fake story and I don't draw any conclusion from it about Sanjay Dutt, just enjoyed it as an entertaining movie and it ended there. Because TM asked what are your views after watching Sanju.
Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
Anniversary 6 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#57

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader



did I called Sanju terrorist??
I don't have any evidence nor I have read all the legal papers regarding his case to come into conclusion whether he is terrorist or he someone caught in circumstances.




I just said Sanju the movie was a fake story and I don't draw any conclusion from it about Sanjay Dutt, just enjoyed it as an entertaining movie and it ended there. Because TM asked what are your views after watching Sanju.



well it is a movie, you cannot expect it to have every single fact, even documentaries don't contain that, I wouldn't call it a complete work of fiction, because a lot of things were real in the movie, especially the relationships, jail experiences and emotions.
desicrowd thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#58

Originally posted by: Bollywoodlaver


How do you know he was involved in Bombay blasts? did you see him do anything? a popular person was made a scapegoat and people like you buy it. If you are so convinced about him being involved then it makes you a traitor and hypocrite for watching this movie, even if it was ranbir, because even ranbir is in full support of glorifying Sanjay, he loves him, all the people who believe Sanjay is a traitor and watched the movie are hypocrites who are only helping in glorifying him further.



Thank you and try again... I believe what I believe... same as Sallu drove the car even though he got out scott free... 🥱
Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
Anniversary 6 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#59

Originally posted by: desicrowd



Thank you and try again... I believe what I believe... same as Sallu drove the car even though he got out scott free... 🥱



there is ample proof for salman, with sanjay there is no proof, and you are free to believe what you want to but the fact you went to watch this movie makes you a hypocrite.
Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
Anniversary 6 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#60

Originally posted by: Irnoymyname

People talking about

evidence
court
judgement
same people
forget
evidence
court
judgement
when its about
SALMAN
same people
bashing Salman
left right center
now giving excuses
for sanju

IRONY



Irony is that salman's case has ample proof yet he is not convicted, actual people died from his own car, what more proof does the judiciary need? in sanjay's case even guns were not found, forget his involvement with the blasts, and he actually served his sentence, unlike salman.
Edited by Bollywoodlaver - 6 years ago
Top