Originally posted by: ShadowImbue
Why can't ITV FLs decide to live away from in-laws by choice? Why it has to be only ML's choice to leave his family and not FL's choice? FL of yrkkh only stay away from family or family jaap when she is thrown out of the house otherwise the only purpose of her life is to "mend relationships" or to avoid taking the blame for separating a son from his family. Living away from in-laws make a woman selfish that's being portrayed for years which is quite regressive & needs to be addressed as there are too many nuclear families these days. Regarding Abhira from "I'm tired of you & your family I'm tired of u all, I hate u all" to "I won't let you leave them" what a journey. From "I don't want any complications in my life" to "I will wait for Dadisa's approval till eternity" What a growth! They have turned my favorite character to
YRKKH is based on a couple's journey with family dynamics involved so the dream of happy joint family who dotes on their DIL has to be fulfilled. It's a must! Why can't regressive egoistic matriarch be left alone by everyone? Why can't DIL be the "wife" first?
I wish, I truly wish Armaan leave not only PH but Abhira too, as his Dadisa and Abhira both need to realize his worth in their life. Abhira can fulfill her wish of staying in OH & keep waiting for Dadisa's approval for lifetime meanwhile Armaan can focus on his individual journey towards self-love after getting freedom from toxic environment. He can meet achi aurat who will prioritize him over his toxic family or even her own family. Abhira didn't value her self-worth & kept dreaming about the man who didn't care about her or who was going to marry someone else, she was at fault now Armaan should make a wise choice and prioritize his self-respect over love. If he decides to stay back & wait for KP's approval it will be his choice, not Abhira's fault.
comment:
p_commentcount