Thank you so much for drilling some sense here. Nobody has an issue with the Hindu aliases because that's factual. The problem is only with exploiting the code names and never once mentioning the actual names. Further, watering down the pakistani isi terrorism is awful. More so when it's well known that one of the released terrorists, monster masood azhar, went on to carry major terror attacks against India. Further, this hijack wasn't the first attempt to free him.Originally posted by: TorinoPasta
Yes, the hijackers did use Hindu aliases. So that is accurate. But nowhere does the show tell us what their real names were. In fact, the Government of India has publicly named them: Sunny Ahmed Qazi, Shakir, Mistri Zahoor Ibrahim, Shahid Akhtar Sayed, and Ibrahim Athar.
The show does not even tell us that these men were Pakistanis and that, a couple of days into the hijack, Indian intelligence agencies had identified them as Pakistani operatives and even knew which parts of Pakistan they came from.
Instead, the show seeks vaguely and unconvincingly to link the hijackers to Afghanistan and even to Al Qaeda, suggesting that the hijacking was part of some grand plan hatched by Osama bin Laden and that, if ISI was involved, then it was in a very junior position.
This is a straight-out lie. The hijacking was an ISI operation, part of the covert war that Pakistan has waged against India for decades.
If a series of 26/11 is made tomorrow, terror apologists like anubhav sinha will say it's okay to call Kasab Samir Dinesh Chaudhuri from Bengaluru because that's the fake identity he was prepared to die with.
comment:
p_commentcount