Posted:
Read the whole thread of this
Read the whole thread of this
Originally posted by: Palak2812
Read the whole thread of this
Applause to their Bravery and dedication 
Going through such Austerities so that you can achieve your goals in the pure Sanatan way of doing things
Prithu, ruled over entire world, that's why we calls it Prithvi, Even RajaRaja chola's Empire was spread till Australia, all the island nations were under his rule, we had many kings but people connects with Bharat more and I don't think anyone is going to change the father of the nation so why to waste our time discussing stuff
According to you , who must be father of nation ?
Originally posted by: Palak2812
Read the whole thread of this
Heard Dhoni didn’t go inspite of invited ? Is it true ?
✅️ Opening of the gates without any legalised or constitutional order by Rajeev Gandhi only led to the ensuing chaos and riots of 1992.
✅️ As a result the unconstitutional waqf act came into existence and enforcement.
✅️ Also, his government backtracking on shah Bhano case sent wrong signals to MPLB, an injustice to entire muslim women.(despite having clear majority he backtracked).
✅️ Hence, MPLB began to armtwist government into accepting MPLB's unreasonable demands on even petty issues causing policy paralysis.
✅️ let's not talk about the messy kashmir pandit exodus and riots which were covered up.
While mentioning the above I'm not talking about the PM of India expressing his inability to control corruption or the personal wealth he has accumulated in the opaque Swiss private banks. I'm discounting even his religious or political affiliation but only talking from the sheer incompetence POV.
His grandfather was virulently anti-Hindu, & his mother unconstitutionally added "socialist" and "secular" to the preamble of the constitution. But he was less so, & it was during his term that the Ayodhya gates were opened for the Shilanyas
The biggest anti-Hindu parties in India at the time was not Congress, but the Janata Dal & Samajwadi Party - leaders like VP Singh, Mulayam Singh Yadav & Laloo Prasad Yadav. Even the Left Front in Bengal/Kerala wasn't that virulently anti-Hindu as they were
Prithu, ruled over entire world, that's why we calls it Prithvi, Even RajaRaja chola's Empire was spread till Australia, all the island nations were under his rule, we had many kings but people connects with Bharat more and I don't think anyone is going to change the father of the nation so why to waste our time discussing stuff
Gandhi worshipers won't be in power forever. At some point, people who don't endorse his ideology will come to power, and at that point, it will be impossible to ignore the question of whether India had no history b4 1947, and if it did, then how is a 150 year old person the father of a nation that is ~10,000 years old. You're right that it's not likely to happen in the short term, but I do see Gandhi being historically discredited more and more just like Mother Teresa is
Originally posted by: RamAayeHain
I was watching lastest video by Dhruv Rathee
Though not shocked by the content I was surprised hearing about Shankaracharya
Wasn't he the one jinhone ye prove kiya tha court mei ki Ram ji ka janm wahi hua tha jaha demolished structure pehle tha, he only figured out by decoding skand puraan and mapping it with the map made in brishti era
To Shankaracharya ki itni trolling kyu hui thi 🤔🤔, agar unko nahi aana tha because of adhoora temple thing then fine na itna kyu bola unko, Ram bhadracharya ne to kaha tha if garbh griha is complete then that means temple is comple bahari structure common logo ke liye hoga
You are right: it was the Shankaracharya(s) who used Skanda Puranas to prove to the court historically that the "Babri" site was the original site of the Ram Janmabhoomi 🛕
People need not endorse him blindly or accept him as the last word on everything Hindu, but I do find the trolling & insults of him by the trust people totally distasteful
Babur came with the one interest but after seeing India he fell in love with India and decided he will make it his kingdom, he recorded that in his diary which was later became BaburNama and destroying temples were not only some military operations, sometimes it was done to show the greatness of the king, Even Aibak destroyed a temple and constructed adhai din ka jhopda there, he wasn't a king for long time like Babur and history says he was a good king but he still did that to show he is the king, he can do it, there are thousands of incidents like this where a king who came for loot only did destroy the temples to show how great they are, I forgot the exact word but Muslim rulers used to adopt a title with proud after breaking an Idol so they used to do that for this purpose
But if you are saying then I will surely check that information as well
Check out the book "Ayodhya revisited" by Kishore Kunal. He was an official of that district (don't remember his exact designation) during both VP Singh & Chandrashekhar, but was really committed to that 🛕 being built. He started taking an active interest when he sensed that the Hindu case before the Allahabad High Court was coming unraveled
comment:
p_commentcount