Posted:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C2Y7hDHyfvl/?igsh=MXF0bzc3dDZ4Z3luZw==
More than 3000 villages are named after Shri Ram🙏
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C2Y7hDHyfvl/?igsh=MXF0bzc3dDZ4Z3luZw==
More than 3000 villages are named after Shri Ram🙏
Bajrangi Bali was always there for Shri Ram and to remind people about his lord🙏Originally posted by: RamAayeHain
Wow didn't knew about this story, that's amazing yaar 😍
I have also heard that when bhagwa flag was mounted on demolished structure police tried to remove it but a monkey came and sat with the flag till night, police men didn't removed it as they thought Hanuman ji had came, when the monkey went away then only they went up and removed the flag
Bajrangi Bali was always there for Shri Ram and to remind people about his lord🙏
Yup
Sab par Ram Tapasvi Raja
Tinke kaaj sakal tum saja
🙏🙏
The prayers chaupai chalisa mantras everything that's written for God is so beautiful ❤️
Manu was the first king, grandfather of Dhruv, while Bharat was the ancestor of puru Dynasty, which came around Mahabharat period (Krishna Avatar) and Manu was ruling during the Matsya Avtar
Puru dynasty first ancestor was Budh, son of Chandra. His son was Pururava, whose son was Yayati, whose son (from Sharmishtha) was Puru. Bharat was one in that line, son of Dushyant, who came some generations later. That's why that dynasty is known as Chandravansh
Where as Manu was the son of Surya-dev & Sanjana, & therefore Ikshvaku's dynasty was known as the Suryavansh
So of these 2, which do you think should be the father of this nation?
Puru dynasty first ancestor was Budh, son of Chandra. His son was Pururava, whose son was Yayati, whose son (from Sharmishtha) was Puru. Bharat was one in that line, son of Dushyant, who came some generations later. That's why that dynasty is known as Chandravansh
Where as Manu was the son of Surya-dev & Sanjana, & therefore Ikshvaku's dynasty was known as the Suryavansh
So of these 2, which do you think should be the father of this nation?
Bold-Manu smriti came from him??
Originally posted by: DamRyeong
My username was akki. Swati. super active on ndtv ramayan fan clubs on forum. I used to have a creation gallery. I think i made Sriti siggies for you :)
Also, now that you mention it, it's been 14 years since that serial that this 🛕 is being built. Speaking of which, if they wanted to invite celebrities, they should have highlighted every actor who played Rama and Sita, not just Arun Govil, Dipika Topiwala (and Sunil Lahiri). Gurmeet & Debina at least should have been there
Like I said Bharta United the subcontinent and much more land under his rule that's why we derives our country's name from whom, whom do you think should be the father of this Nation who United the country under one name or who only came first?
Puru dynasty first ancestor was Budh, son of Chandra. His son was Pururava, whose son was Yayati, whose son (from Sharmishtha) was Puru. Bharat was one in that line, son of Dushyant, who came some generations later. That's why that dynasty is known as Chandravansh
Where as Manu was the son of Surya-dev & Sanjana, & therefore Ikshvaku's dynasty was known as the Suryavansh
So of these 2, which do you think should be the father of this nation?
Manu may belongs to Iskhvakus Dynasty aka Lord Ram's clan but we can't forget the fact that even lord Ram did not had the entire nation under his rule, I am talking about direct rule, he was the indirect ruler as sughriv, vibhishan, nishad raj, his brothers and many such kings were existing during his time
No, Manusmriti came during Gupta's, Bhanu Gupta was the ruler
Just noticed that three threads had been merged into this one, two of them just celebrating and one with controversies...not a good idea, t think...the controversies should also have merged into one thread so there would have been a celebration thread (where I also had posted in a celebratory way) and a discussion thread...
comment:
p_commentcount