Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona
Correct me if I am wrong,
But the chaos also included riots that killed so many people
Why is it necessary to fight over a mosque constructed in 1528?
It was wrong obviously to demolish a temple to construct mosques. But how is it any better to fight over something that happened centuries ago?
How is it valid for so many people to die for it? To me, it seems so futile.
Jo ghar logo ke khoon se sana haa kya bhagwaan waha kabhi basenge?
They were open fired on mulayam Singh Yadav's orders. If you have to blame someone blame him. Can you imagine the uproar if a Muslim crowd was open fired upon? It would have led to not just national but international havoc. But since it's Hindus let's blame them for getting fired upon.
It's definitely right to fight for what is ours even if it was occupied by invader over a course of time. Ar least I believe in this.
Aur ye to sentimental dialogue mara hai na khoon se sana wala, uske ek gaana yaad aaya - kurbani kurbani kurbani, Allah ko pyari hai kurbani (kurbani film ka hai shayad). Un shaeedon ki kurbani hazaron lakhon hinduon ke swabhiman ke liye thi. Vyarth nai gayi.
comment:
p_commentcount