******************EDITED*************************
Moderator's Note: Please keep religon out of this debate. No religon advocates violence !! |
Moderator's Note: Please keep religon out of this debate. No religon advocates violence !! |
Originally posted by: SolidSnake
Another major problem is the funding, majority of funds are sourced from Arab Countries esp Saudi Arabia, sheikhs, they have too much of petro-dollars, they don't know what to do with it and most of that money goes into building terror infrastructure.
.
With that money they can well feed the politicians and statesman of the developed countries, who in turn restrain in the research and invention of some alternative for oil as a fuel. If you have watched "Syriana" you would know what kind of dirty games these politicians and oil companies play.
Originally posted by: chocolate
Hi
Hot topic going on....eh?
Since this topic is very sensitive and delicate please handle it with extra care.
Plz do not make attacking remarks on religion. Every religion is mixture of both good and bad people. Extremists are there in each and every religion. But you can't blame the religion itself for the terrorism and hurt the feelings of same believes in general. Can you tell that only Christians died in 911 incident or only Hindus died in 711 incident? I personally know a muslim family which was completely shattered after 911 incident. Did terrorism excuse them for being a Muslim? According to the most of discussion here they should have been saved some how miraculously on that day!!
We have to fight against terrorism to save the humanity. But we should not target out just one group of people of same believes.
So my request can we stop bashing the religion here and go back to the original topic of India's next step of terrorism prevention. Can it be like Israel's or not?
Regards
chocolate
Yeah, I agree with what you say.
As world citizens, first we should realize our duties and reponsibilities, then comes country or religious belief. That applies for all. Or a WWIII between one community and the rest of the world is inevitable in near future.
[Quote]But we have already been doing what you have suggested since last 2 decades, but terrorism has only increased and spread to other parts of India. Do you remember when India had amassed its troops on IB after Paliament Attack, the intensity of terror attacks had decreased bec'se Pak Army realised that India is close to using the final option they dread. I am not saying declare an open war against Pak, the least we could do is make symbolic strike against Pak Army installations/Terror Camps. And I support that we should take clandestine ops against them. We can also scrap Indus Water Treaty (no water for Pak), or support "Freedom Fighters" in Baluchistan who are being oppressed by Pak Army.[/Quote]
I don't understand how we've been doing what we haven't been doing. Some of what you are recommending, as in building military and such, are defensive actions, which is in contrast offensive military action. Again, action needs to be taken thoughtfully, and simply taking knee-jerk actions such as attacking specific installations will only create martyrs of those killed (I'm not saying that it shouldn't be done covertly however, but definately not openly). However, taking economic defensive measure, as I have suggested earlier, would be far more effective.
[Quote]I don't get it, the fact that they are killing hundreds of our citizens in bomb blasts, that they support anti-national groups all accross India. I am afraid they have already crossed the limit, these are acts which are against India and deserve a punitive action. And what careful action are you talking about, next time when a blast happens in Delhi, our PM will issue the same rubbish statement, victims will be paid compensation...many families won't be same again. Then more blasts and same thing again.[/Quote]
Please at least attempt to comprehend what I say. Thoughtful action, as I have said repeatedly, involves carefull clandestine planning, and defensive approaches. Taking offensive action is rarely ever successful.
Infact, take a look at Israel; the nation has had numerous terrorist attacks within its borders after pursuing the hardline approaches of Ariel Sharon. Sharon then had a change of heart and formed a new, and more moderate, party. This party pulled out of the Gaza, and correspondingly terrorist activities within Israel fell. People in Israel and Palestine actually believed in some sort of a peaceful future, and the Arab Nations, including the various terrorist organizations, actually recognized Israel and said that they could indeed coexist. This diplomatic breakthrough all went down the toilet after the terrorist organization, Hezbullah, kidnapped two soldiers and the new leader of Israel, Olmert, took to aggressivism. Keep in mind, that the nation of Lebanon never really supported Hezbullah, and this action could very well have fallen on Hezbullah's face because public support (in the Mid East) for it was already waning. Terrorist Activity has now spiked, and the current Israeli policy is doing nothing to stymie it.
The militaristic approach you suggest, at least the offensive parts of it, will do nothing but to create the same situation, if not worse. If you think we are in a bad predicament now, aggressivism will only worsen it.
[Quote]Haha, lekin aapne baat hi aisi likhi...this is what you wrote...no sane person would write this...
India is already a threat to outside countries. The reason that terrorism is so prevalent in India is because no country can wage aggressive open war with India-especially the Middle East Countries (with the except of Israel maybe).[/Quote]
Your petty insults aside, what does my comment have to do with anything contrary to what I have said before? India is a powerful nation and is a threat to outside nations. India is a powerful enough to fight terrorism without taking overtly aggressive measures, and the terrorist attacks have had (and will have) little to no impact on Indian economic and military facilities. Please try to comprehend what you write before you post.
[Quote]So will you support if India breaks all ties/trade/contacts with Pakistan? [/Quote]
That rather than open warfare (or open attacks against 'symbolic' Pakistani areas). Keep in mind there are still dialogues proceeding between Japan and N Korea.
Originally posted by: SolidSnake
Prarara, sorry if I offended you.
I agree with some of your points. I think we should first try non-military options like breaking all ties with them. But ruling out Military option completely would be akin to commiting suicide.
I Still don't think that "that particular" statement of yours made sense. And you again wrote...
"India is a powerful nation and is a threat to outside nations. India is a powerful enough to fight terrorism without taking overtly aggressive measures, and the terrorist attacks have had (and will have) little to no impact on Indian economic and military facilities."
I am not getting what exactly you want to say? Are you saying that India being a powerful country should continue to tolerate terror acts? 😕
That's understandable. Sorry for the misunderstanding, but what I meant to say is that India is a powerful nation, and that terrorist attacks within it will not destroy India as much as create terror in India. We are powerful enough to combat it rationally and calmly while looking at all possible solutions and consequences.
comment:
p_commentcount