Originally posted by: Minionite
Carisma it's very easy to try to explain away the rule breaking and bashing afterwards. But the point is the same as in PM. The entire team and the Moderator agree that your post was a bashing of ARK's looks, not on his acting or his choice of projects or anything else. Adding double spaces, making a new paragraph, etc. is no excuse.
I have been an editor throughout most of my schooling and university studies as well, so don't pull this whole "I am a writer and I have a lot of thoughts" thing with me.
We will apologize and correct our mistake when there is one. In this case there isn't one.
After this point, I consider this point moot. Repeating the same thing again and again will not remove the WL. I told you clearly in PM that the Moderator's decision is final and will be accepted. This is the final decision.
Again, what I say is a moot point.
What you assume is correct, I'm pulling a fast one.
No point explaining afterwards..
Hang on maybe I shud have explained before writing the post.. had I known it will be taken for his looks.
When did I say I am a writer I have a lot of thoughts?
Again misconception. I said I pack a lot of stuff in one comment.
Yes I have said I am a creative writer. Not just limited to creative though.
If you read my posts, you will see that I tend to address a number of things within one comment box.
But wait.. problem with you.. till date everything I told you was proved correct.. yet you still fail to see it.
Change reason, for bashing his acting. I'll accept that. But your problem is you think you are clever and know it all. You don't know me even by 5% Shreya.
Keep the WL, I don't have an expectation of great comprehension from IF team, hence I was Always too good for this forum. Common sense was always IF teams weakness. Your Shruti Global mod was the best example of that. Vijay is nice but has no idea how much ppl hate this place, a youth networking platform was the most toxic place they experienced, you fail to safeguard users.
I'm not even bothered if you guys ban me Even..but atleast do the WLs with right reasons..not YOUR moot points. Change it to bashing kaushal coz I said he has hooded eyes, change it to criticising an actors lazy attitude and bad acting, atleast it will have some fairness.
But now thinking more Into it, don't you think ARK is festering away in looks? <----- Does this comment now mean another WL? Or does it justify for the one I got unfairly? If I got the time, I might aswell do the crime huh!
That's my attitude Miss Shreya, I'm very open about things, I don't sweep things under the carpet or need to lie. So bear that in mind. Coz you will never come across anyone like me.
Now for the other times I have been given WL's for which were not crimes... I'll see to make sure to do those crimes too.
You're always assuming wrong, but never want to admit you are wrong.
Your post here just proved what I am saying.
You go after finding an intent, an editor you were? Then pick out proof from the literature. Find words that indicate looks. Show me how that phrase anyhow connects to looks when it means insignificant. Don't assume my intent, do not make an allegation I'm pulling a fast one. Disect the material, without repeating the same line reading it out to me. Go on as a writer disect it, explore it and summarise it. Don't take guesses in the dark.
Put your money where your mouth is, I already did. You chose not to fall of your high horse and believe it.
So Vijay, Is moderation done upon what's actually written or what the moderation team wants to assume it to be?
As for whoever this unidentified entity called Moderator is, obvious why they go unidentified, coz another soul with a power trip problem.
Edited by carisma2 - 8 months ago
comment:
p_commentcount