I would differ from some members here pointing a finger at Aahaana for not replying to PMs. She is one of those GMs who replies to PMs rather promptly. Lately, she might have been busy with her personal life but she does address the urgent issues.
I would differ from some members here pointing a finger at Aahaana for not replying to PMs. She is one of those GMs who replies to PMs rather promptly. Lately, she might have been busy with her personal life but she does address the urgent issues.
Originally posted by: Olive_Rose
@ Lazyleaves..., hypocrisy at it's best and he called me rude 😳True he will show up when someone comes along to throw flowers at the DT and sings them songs of praises.We're still waiting for answers to questions from thread he made over 6 months ago.
I would differ from some members here pointing a finger at Aahaana for not replying to PMs. She is one of those GMs who replies to PMs rather promptly. Lately, she might have been busy with her personal life but she does address the urgent issues.
Originally posted by: lazyleaves
^That was my fourth comment on the thread. Thank you so much for replying. I frequent only IPK and the FF forum and I personally am very happy with the DTs there and have never faced any issues with them.
But my issue is with your higher DT including you. In the 3 weeks when all the DTs had mysteriously gone on a leave (I checked all the forums where the notes were posted. Funny fact: Two notes by two different MODs were same), I had PMed SIX DTs, you included. 2 of your GMs had not logged in in ages! One of your GMs was busy increasing her posts by posting the number '8' and names on a thread (The new rule will implement here, won't it?). The other two DTs whom I PMed were you and priya.nair. Another was the forum DT.
I know the DTs are busy and have their own personal life to handle. But don't you think if you have taken up the responsibility then you should at least come online and do all the spamming that you want, AFTER you have addressed the issues of the members?
I have never been in fights with anyone on the forum or any MODs. I have no issues with any of these MODs actually but my only problem is their carelessness towards their responsibilities. If they cant continue to handle their duties, appoint someone who at least is active on the forum. If you wish to know the names of these DTs, its there in your inbox in my message.
In fact, I would like to appreciate Angel-Jot. and ~Saraa~ who looked in to our issue, even during their leave because the DTs we were asked to speak to were unresponsive!
Basically you need an active and responsive higher DT or else the grievances will only pile up!
Well warning levels are certainly given in accordance to the post itself. Since you posted about your own WL I would simply like to know why you are posting selectively the reason for which you were given a WL increase. You also know it was not raised cause you just called someone "two-faced" but it was much more than that against another member (not me or any of the DT).
This is the problem with some of the members that they create a lot of hue and cry about how IF should protect its members from personal attacks and when we do that they will call us "biased".
Regarding the MID issue also I tend to disagree with you cause much of the MIDs are created just to bash someone without getting identified and it is not something very recent but this challenge has always been there and unfortunately we have limited options. There are even instances we have seen members creating MIDs to bash themselves up or make post against a certain group so that they can instigate other members and create unrest in the forum.
Regards,
I don't see you mentioning in your rules the criteria of judging how much WL has to be given for a certain derogatory post? Please do so.
I don't personally attack members, Vijay, but I sure as hell won't waste my time justifying myself to you for what I said. And hah, don't think I'm some whiny kiddo who goes and cries in her pillow just because of some virtual warning'.I just want to know why all those fangirls calling people "jobless" and "pathetic losers" aren't getting their share of the WL raise too. Lol you should see how often these kinds of terms are thrown at the 'hatemongers'. But it's futile speaking to you about it because you and I both know who's biased.I don't see you mentioning in your rules the criteria of judging how much WL has to be given for a certain derogatory post? Please do so.
Mr Vijay B
It would be more polite-since you are preaching that virtue- to address the questions posed by my post, rather than deleting my subsequent posts!Isn't THAT rather rude on YOUR part?Or do you enjoy privileges that you do NOT allow others on IF????
comment:
p_commentcount