Urvashi questions National Award for choosing Best Actress - Page 3

Originally posted by: Oliviasmith321

Urvashi Rautela's candid reflection on her National Film Award for Best Actress is both intriguing and thought-provoking. While many would consider such an accolade a pinnacle of achievement, her decision to question the jury's criteria showcases a commendable level of self-awareness and humility. It's rare for public figures to openly express such sentiments, and it adds a layer of authenticity to her persona. This introspection could spark meaningful discussions about the transparency and processes behind award selections in the entertainment industry.

urvashi rautela ? this is south actress urvashi.

Originally posted by: dolejey

Such arrogance. Yeh tumhari baap ka desh, forum, or thread hai that you can give orders like a maharani? Now to post here one must listen to your rules kaminey? Reporting you for harassing a new user just because they didn't read every post. Not everyone has all time on their hands like you do, interfering in foreign affairs that do not concern you.

Nikal jao is forum se churail.

what he said certainly makes sense about a lead actress being nominated in supporting actress category but coming from him i doubt his intentions. he always want to crtiticise bjp government.

one more thing this is not the first time a lead role is being awarded in supporting role. this happens when the producers of a movie sends an actress in a certain category.

yes i believe its a he not she or maybe its a she who's a hindu woman married to a jihadi.

Originally posted by: dolejey

Such arrogance. Yeh tumhari baap ka desh, forum, or thread hai that you can give orders like a maharani? Now to post here one must listen to your rules kaminey? Reporting you for harassing a new user just because they didn't read every post. Not everyone has all time on their hands like you do, interfering in foreign affairs that do not concern you.

Nikal jao is forum se churail.

First, I didn't harrass anyone, second, it was only about the f i r s t post, thirdly I think that you have an emotional problem with me you try to vent here... reported you already for another post because of your language towards me... you know, why not try to do these attacks on pm?

Snatch, do you really engage in such a kind of voicing an opinion about a member (this being me) because you have a certain image of me?...

Edit: not reported but a bit sad that you give me stamps without knowing me...

Originally posted by: dolejey

Doesn't it tell you something that half the members here have you blocked? And the other half openly hate you. When you are attacked (on a regular basis I might add), no one ever comes to defend you. Everyone watches silently enjoying the hungama or they join in to tell you exactly what they think of you. Do not think we have forgotten the way you attacked Ratan Tata mere hours after his death, spreading foreign conspiracies about him here. Shameless person. You should have been instantly banned on that day.

It's sorry that you can't get over this one article where my interpretation of a certain part may have been an error from my side and I think, I appologized for that.

The rest of your post is just your opinion which I don't perceive as an attack with insulting language. Everybody can have an opinion about another person...it's just a matter of how to voice/show it.

Originally posted by: Clochette

Snatch, do you really engage in such a kind of voicing an opinion about a member (this being me) because you have a certain image of me?...

Edit: not reported but a bit sad that you give me stamps without knowing me...

because you constantly do this.....and how many times are we going to ignore this.

ok i am sorry if i hurt you.

Dear, I'm not hurt...and it's okay that you voice an opinion about me, but you never voiced it the way this alleged Beginner did in multiple posts now

Originally posted by: Sparkle_Soul

https://x.com/mystic_riverrr/status/1951298891208597600?s=46

Bingo. Urvashi mothered hard here. It is what Rani could aspire to be.

Also, NA for Jawan is probably an apology for Swades. We'll take it. Maybe they're trying to make nice with shah after everything they did to him.

Originally posted by: Oliviasmith321

Urvashi Rautela's candid reflection on her National Film Award for Best Actress is both intriguing and thought-provoking. While many would consider such an accolade a pinnacle of achievement, her decision to question the jury's criteria showcases a commendable level of self-awareness and humility. It's rare for public figures to openly express such sentiments, and it adds a layer of authenticity to her persona. This introspection could spark meaningful discussions about the transparency and processes behind award selections in the entertainment industry.

Far too often, it is about the first page of the BW forum section, then the topictitles, then clicking the "<" behind the last name of those who had posted and then writing according to the thoughts about the topic title... or the last post (I wouldn't exclude myself )