Urvashi questions National Award for choosing Best Actress - Page 2

Originally posted by: Clochette

You can't abstain from demeaning SRK and his fans whenever there is a possibility...

Just to let you know:

"Swades is not a direct remake of any specific Kannada movie, but it shares thematic similarities with the Kannada film Chigurida Kanasu. Chigurida Kanasu, based on a novel by K. Shivaram Karanth, also features a protagonist returning to his village and working to improve it. While Swades doesn't explicitly acknowledge the Kannada film, director T.S. Nagabharana has stated that he believes it to be a "replica" of his 2002 film, and he was a jury member when Swades was considered for the National Awards. "

This time Ashutosh was a jury member...and I think that he may not have difficulties to lobby for SRK getting the NA now. As it is for a movie of another quality than those considered as worthy (like, e.g., Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa, Swades, Chak De), certain people are quick to label it "consolation prize" or completely contest it.

You got no knowhow about the system and political affairs of the country yet you say so much for someone who is not a citizen of that country.

If a film is reported and found to be plagiarized then they don't award it major categories.The director of the film was in the jury.

I am sharing a small part of the interview.

https://x.com/SAMTHEBESTEST_/status/1952228131835896086

No he didn’t deserve for any of those films.Have you even seen any of those performance of the winners? I am sure you have not. National Awards are not limited to hindi films.

Oh man, I was wondering what issue Urvashi Rautela had

Don't underestimate my knowledge only because I live in Germany and I'm someone without desi/arabic roots... I'm sure you're neither familiar with the Kannada movie nor with the story it was based on. This director just had his own agenda...

Nevertheless, I don't begrudge Saif's 10.000 rupees he got for his NA for his performance in Hum Tum... it was long in the past when I started my journey into the Hindi filmindustry...

Originally posted by: Clochette

Don't underestimate my knowledge only because I live in Germany and I'm someone without desi/arabic roots... I'm sure you're neither familiar with the Kannada movie nor with the story it was based on. This director just had his own agenda...

Nevertheless, I don't begrudge Saif's 10.000 rupees he got for his NA for his performance in Hum Tum... it was long in the past when I started my journey into the Hindi filmindustry...

The more I read of you the more you prove me right.So now the blame falls on the director having an agenda. There are no boundaries on your worshipping your favorite.

Well... Jack has joined those who blocked me so that I can't read them anymore...but quoting me nevertheless. I think, it is a bit unfair to comment on me but hinder me to read it... I suppose that those who blocked me still can read my posts... it's a weird thing, this blocking feature...

Fyi Urvashi in this context is Malayalam actress and not Urvashi Rautela.

Malayalam actress Urvashi has already won multiple national and state awards. U can google abt her.

Originally posted by: nimilak860

My question is why Urvashi has even been given an award in the first place?!?

She is a national joke and people are complaining about SRK and Rani winning and how that delegitimizes the National Awards but not thinking that so-called twice-winner Miss Universe being given one isn't the biggest shock to the award's credibility? Her winning makes India a joke.

Urvashi should be content that somehow she was given even one NA rather than claim she is above it because she was a lead and not supporting. In the few movies she made, she hasn't delivered one performance that would be award worthy.

neither srk desrves any national award for any movie he did so far hes mediocre actor

neither rani deserved this national award although shes good actor compared to other bollywood heroines after 90s

amitabh bachchan never got awards for namak haram or even sholay or mili etc till recently where he got many awards

nor dilip kumar got national award ever even for mughal e azam and shakti(where he acted better than amtabh bachchan) nor devdas etc why srk getting it for jawan dunki etc kind of pathetic movies which are not even 1% of a mughal ea azam or sholay in quality

neither nargis, meenakumar, sharmila got awards for much better acting in famous movies in 50s and 60s

does it mean SRK and rani or any bollywood actor after 90s are better actors than amitabh and dilip kumar and meena kumari in acting that they are getting awards after awards

doesnt that mean that acting standard till 2000 was so high before that even dilip kumar, amitabh bachchan, meena kumar, nargis, never got that national awards (very rare 1 or 2 some got)

Why not read at least the first post when coming into a thread???

Tell me one entertainment award where there aren't controversial opinions about those who got and those who (never) got/get one.

Here in the thread, it is something else because giving an actress a NA in the supporting category for her work in a movie where she had a leading role is - basically - an insult.