KMTMG Discussions Thread #15 - Page 66

Originally posted by: Adiandsid

It's fine if that's what the story is about - Amruta loving or trusting people (men esp) who fall short... be it her dad, shubh, V, Abhir, and Harsh (and bhavani) too. Does she learn though?

The way Sriti was eating non-stop throughout the scene was hilarious... this girl! I only watched their scenes today, and they were so good that I forgot the background story. I enjoyed the episode maybe I skipped all the other parts that usually remind me that RA is B2s’ guy

Originally posted by: Mythri123

Amruta is stuck in her vicious circle her own mother at this age never learned anything ( Jayesh , Harsh or Abhir etc) and she became an idol for her daughter . I always say Bhavani is an emotional burden on her daughter . If someone has to die it should be Bhavani ( strictly my POV)

Dont think she is the idol for her daughter. But then her dad was her role model. He fell... but they didnt go into how it affected her... cause they wanted to show chem scenes. She is the only member of her og family left with her.

Wanting to do something because you care for your mom isnt blasphemy... just like wanting to do something for your husband need not be too.

Do remember Bhavani was the one who wanted her to continue in the marriage even after ex came in- wanted her to keep vrat for virat. If you had problems with Bhavani doing that back then, I can agree what she is doing now is bad. Else... she was wrong back then, and she is wrong now too.

Oops. Wrong thread. Moved to ZRA thread

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/post/166642475

Babita losing her son was result of her action to bring back Ex. Has nothing to do with Amu. Babita lost her son after she betrayed him or her actions led to Virat deaths. Babita despicable actions to Amu must be resolved separately imo

Last para. Writers have not captured what you explained. Its time we stop doing writers work & explain plot they failed. Predicting a possibility or suggesting better is ok. Filling in context for writers should be avoided. Would we be saying the same about bhavani if RA used virat to manipulate Amu?... No bhavani is not entirely innocent & her manipulation is wrong. Cant be sure she doing this because of wealth based on writers depiction

Originally posted by: Mythri123

Babita is arrogant and she was not listening to anyone as she was handling business and living in high circles with lot of money with a husband who thinks because of her mothers guinnees earned money , where as Bhavani is uneducated and depending on her daughter who is educated independent and capable of taking her own decisions ( it might be correct or not depending on viewers POV) .

Change in Babita and Bhavani’s characters are being noticed after the leap Someone has lost her grown up son definitely a mother would be mellowed down for sure irrespective of her personality . It’s a loss no one can fill in.

Bhavani is becoming more arrogant because of her new found financial status with her own business and daughter’s support. I know many people who became so confident when they become financially strong

Dont think itv can ever have a show like some movies (sorry can only think of South Indian ones) like Autograph or Premam - be it from the male or female perspective. Fans will likely be annoyed... perhaps even if it is stated upfront it is about 3 relationships the character went through in his / her life.

Writers did they listen to you before no , I noticed change in Bhavani’s behaviour it’s completely my POV .

I don’t think it’s going to affect writers whatever we all write here . This show would have become an excellent one if some one listens to anyone of you ( leave me I am new)

Originally posted by: sugz

Babita losing her son was result of her action to bring back Ex. Has nothing to do with Amu. Babita lost her son after she betrayed him or her actions led to Virat deaths. Babita despicable actions to Amu must be resolved separately imo

Last para. Writers have not captured what you explained. Its time we stop doing writers work & explain plot they failed. Predicting a possibility or suggesting better is ok. Filling in context for writers should be avoided. Would we be saying the same about bhavani if RA used virat to manipulate Amu?... No bhavani is not entirely innocent & her manipulation is wrong. Cant be sure she doing this because of wealth based on writers depiction

Please read my post once more. My point is we cant create context for writers where they failed. POV from users I understand where we suggest better or predict possibilities. Dont think its good objective to create context for writers after they fail.

Generally we or other users will say. Is it possible writers were thinking... or lets play devils advocate to give context to writers objective.

I dont expect them or want them to listen to me after they ruined show. How respectful of a user to say ' YOU '. They wont listen to me. Thank you for tagging me specifically

Originally posted by: Mythri123

Writers did they listen to you before no , I noticed change in Bhavani’s behaviour it’s completely my POV . I don’t think it’s going to affect writers whatever we all write here . This show would have become an excellent if some one listens to anyone of you ( leave me I am new)

I think it’s becoming a war here because of mainly Bhavani . I will stop this discussion because I noticed it’s not a discussion and POV anymore but I respect everyone’s POV .

Writers POV is always different if we understand their POV then there is no discussion at all

Anyone of you means ( it could be anyone from this channel or any critics ) it is not disrespectful. Sorry if it was misunderstood

(If you had problems with Bhavani doing that back then, I can agree what she is doing now is bad. Else... she was wrong...) YOU was used here but I never took it offensive .