**Dhruv Tara - Samay Sadi Se Pare Episode Discussion Thread #14 ** - Page 44

Originally posted by: aekiel

I had always thought Dhruv learning sword fighting and horse riding in the 17th century would've been nice to watch. They were essential skills in that century and I thought he'd learn it from Tara and Bhaiji, with the possibility of some nice D-T, D-M and D-T-M scenes interspersed.

Didn't quite anticipate him learning it this way though

If they make him a semi-competent warrior (shouldn't be possible in such a short period of time, but this is ITV after all), there's every possibility we could see "King Dhruv" in the future.

I had the same thought and as per the spoiler he is taking on two strong guys which realistically is not possible but here we have gods guidance so anything is possible.

Can an outsider be a king? Unless he takes over the kingdom then it’s a possibility. Tara will make a nice Queen and queen mother can go live with that babaji and both can play shrap shrap 🙄🙄🙄 I can’t believe I am saying this but I would have preferred had she died at least a character would not have been ruined this bad. She has gone bonkers times ten.

I find Dhruvs getup ridiculous but then again Tara’s soldiers attire is ridiculous too 😂😂

Originally posted by: aekiel

Btw, there's a new spoiler where Dhruv Khilji is fighting against fellow princes, and doing quite well actually (see the spoiler thread)

At this moment, I want Dhruv to screen Padmavat movie infront of Raj Privaar esp to Samrat and Dhruv give entry as Khilji

DD to Tara - I came for you Rajkumari Padmavat Tarapriya

Tara's mind voice be like.. Should I also jump into the aag

Originally posted by: VirenDev

Bechara humara dhruv why can't he have a simple and peaceful life which he deserves.Jabse woh 17th century mein aaya hai tabse bhai ko ek din ki bhi shanti nahi hai.Chalo starting mein sirf senapati hi piche pada tha abhi toh poora Vallabgarh uske jaan ke piche pada (except anusuya and Sukanya)plus maharishi bhi aagaye hai wapis.Maharishi ka mujhe itna tension nahi kyunki ab krishnaji aagaya toh woh unka kuch bandobast kar lenge."Aisa koi shraap nahi jise woh mitya na kar sake"(there is no such curse in this world which he can't void/falsify it) as once quoted by him in mahabharat.Jab tak kanhaji saath tab tak DK aur dhruv ka koi kuch nahi bigaad sakte.Aur ye maharishi jo game khel rahe hai shraap dene ka, future batane ka ye sab band hoga I hope kanhaji hi band karainge.Abhi ka track jis taraf jaa raha hai udar pehle toh dhruv innocent prove hoga obviously par uske baad writers kaise redeem karenge DQ aur DK ko is beyond my knowledge. Aur phir apna dhruv bhi kaise react karega after his truth is out wo bhi dekhna padega. Obviously in a perfect world dhruv asaani se maaf toh nahi karna chahiye inhe but in ITVs we really can't have logic can we?.kabhi kabhi sochta hoon dhruv aaya hi kyon 17th century 21st mein hi thik tha apne family ke pass. Let's hope writers dhruv ko bhi thoda justice de after his innocence has been proven.

Mujhe PSM.vapas chihye!! In royals ki khatiya khadi karne ke liye! Matlab pagal log hai yaar yeh log

Originally posted by: Minhasmansi92

Mujhe PSM.vapas chihye!! In royals ki khatiya khadi karne ke liye! Matlab pagal log hai yaar yeh log

PSM to Khilji - Yeh Asundar insaan kaun hai?

Originally posted by: MyDriYa

PSM to Khilji - Yeh Asundar insaan kaun hai?

PSM ko Dhruv khilji get up me bhi sundar.. Atisundar... Mahasundar hi lagta

Originally posted by: Minhasmansi92

Mujhe PSM.vapas chihye!! In royals ki khatiya khadi karne ke liye! Matlab pagal log hai yaar yeh log

Shamu khilji na sahi Dhruv khilji hi khatiya khadi kar de royals ki to bhi chalega

https://twitter.com/Twinkle7848301/status/1697485248601456654?s=20

But I like CK's expression sadistic pleasure u know

Originally posted by: aekiel

Not justifying her character, but it's always about the lens you view it from- in the 21st century, it's almost impossible to imagine that your significant other could love you, but also have the motivation to kill your parent at the same time.

In the 17th century, where an eye for an eye is possible and socially acceptable (remember that the King offered the sword to Dhruv, who drew it before Ravi Baba's gasping diverted him), the thought process is different.

Tara clearly believes that

a) Dhruv loves her

b) Dhruv had enough motivation to kill her father, and her father's dying declaration is proof of it.

c) She loves Dhruv, but will pick duty for Vallabhgarh over love if asked to choose.

and she also believes that a, b and c can all be true at the same time.

I wrote this yesterday. Look at Riya's interview here (from the 1:14 mark). She's pretty much saying the same things for Tara's character.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEofBWEbB6A

Originally posted by: Chinmayi18

Shamu khilji na sahi Dhruv khilji hi khatiya khadi kar de royals ki to bhi chalega