Originally posted by: Dhruvvtaraa34
Mere ko toh samajh nahi aata ki log Tara ko kaise justify karte hai…..bhai wo aurat gone case hai……insaaniyat nahi hai uss mein apne parivar ki tarah……aur Dhruv toh chodo ye aurat kisi ke bhi laayak nahi hai…..
Not justifying her character, but it's always about the lens you view it from- in the 21st century, it's almost impossible to imagine that your significant other could love you, but also have the motivation to kill your parent at the same time.
In the 17th century, where an eye for an eye is possible and socially acceptable (remember that the King offered the sword to Dhruv, who drew it before Ravi Baba's gasping diverted him), the thought process is different.
Tara clearly believes that
a) Dhruv loves her
b) Dhruv had enough motivation to kill her father, and her father's dying declaration is proof of it.
c) She loves Dhruv, but will pick duty for Vallabhgarh over love if asked to choose.
and she also believes that a, b and c can all be true at the same time.
Edited by aekiel - 2 years ago
0