Hello all you wonderful people. Before I start, *DISCLAIMER* -
- I have been following YRKKH only from the current, i.e., third generation. The only knowledge I have of the previous generations is from the context that characters have provided on the show.
- I am brand new to the forum, however, I have been reading posts and updates from some fellow members for quite some time now.
- I am an ardent HC fan. I respect him and his work. I started watching YRKKH only for HC. So I understand how some of us always try and justify our favorite actor's character.
- I am a Harshali shipper. I just love seeing them together cause they manifest such positivity. This makes me an Abhira shipper (unconsciously now, even though I acknowledge that their characters together are far from perfect). So I understand how some of us want to see our favorite pairs as endgames and there is no harm in that.
- This post is not focused on my opinion of the characters but my POV on the show's narrative.
Now coming to the post itself, I am truly disheartened by some of the comments that are being passed around in social media forums. We are so invested in a FICTIONAL show that we are not thinking twice before posting something which basically results in a fight between ACTUAL human beings. It is good to have an opinion, because opinions are what makes us decisive. Without opinions we would all be wanderers. But we should be accepting and not be closed books when it comes to others voicing their opinions.
The YRKKH S3 characters are works of writers and show creators. They and ONLY they are the ones who own the storyline and what we see on our screens. So please stop associating characters to actors. The actors are WILLINGLY portraying their characters and doing the best that they can to show what the writers have in store for them. If you think Abhinav cries too much, it's because that is what the writers want out of him for the narrative. If you think Akshara in CERTAIN instances gives priority to her husband over her child, it's because that is what the writers want out of her for the narrative. If you think Abhimanyu makes impulsive decisions and VERBALLY abused his wife (oops, ex wife), it's because that is what the writers want out of him for the narrative.
I am honestly tired of how writers think they can show anything. I understand the concept of leaps in ITV. I understand that a character's traits may change over a leap. But how does a character's entire identity change? Matlab, kuch bhi!
For example,
Akshara, I LOVED the concept of a licensed music therapist who wanted to make a career in singing so that she can help more people. She lost her identity because of ghost singing (which she had to do to save her ex husband's career cause, ITV logic!) but then she was determined to regain it and prove her worth. A once strong-willed woman who was willing to go live alone away from family to keep her sister happy, who was willing to go live alone away from family (yes, she had her brother around, but that was not the plan when she initially agreed to the condition) to keep her ex husband's career intact. What did the writers reduce this character to? A pregnant woman who was unable to take care of herself without the help of a stranger who she ridiculously asked to be the father of her child and falsely named him on the birth certificate (not going to comment on whether this is a criminal offense or not because a, I am not a lawyer or aware of the specifics; b, this would surely entertain a lot of unnecessary comments from people claiming to know the intricacies of the very vast Indian judicial system; and mainly c, this is ITV, so reality does not apply). A woman who married the said stranger ONLY to give a happy family to her kid. A woman who hid her child from his father for 6 years (which I can vaguely understand) but refused to reveal the truth to even after knowing that he has done nothing but be a confidant to the kid and saved him from a life threatening condition. A woman who refused to reveal the truth about the said child even when the father was critical, not knowing whether he was going to survive. A woman who was nothing but rude and mean to her son's father even after he got to know that he has a son, when all he wanted was to be a part of his son's life. Don't even get me started on the law student's jam making career. Akshara definitely does not owe any explanation to her ex husband. But it is foolish to think that she owes no explanation to her son's real father. How does one's identity change so much? ONLY because of that one fateful white day?
Abhira, I loved that they found each other when they least expected it. Minus the drama in between, I think their story was beautiful. I believe that it was love, others may say it was just lust or infatuation. I respect everyone's opinions. I liked how they completed each other. Akshara was (to an extent) able to help Abhimanyu with his impulse and aggression and show him that real love did exist. Abhimanyu was able to help Akshara with loving herself and making sure that she gave importance to her individuality and career. Their marriage faced a lot of hurdles (like any ITV marriage). Their love life was always interrupted by external factors. I understand that this is a family drama. But some of the decisions taken by them are far from reality. We never got to see the potential of their marriage, how they made up for the lost time before their wedding (as they were busy trying to convince family members for their approval instead of getting to know each other). Abhira had so much potential that the fictional couple became couple goals for viewers, they were winning hearts everywhere, they were topping charts (still are, I think?), winning best jodi awards. But all this was butchered in the name of drama, and butchered to such an extent that we find it hard to believe that such a couple even existed on the show.
This is the flaw of the writers. I understand that ITV is far from reality. But to what extent? How can a story or its characters change so much that people would go on social media wars to defame them to such a bad degree? And how low can viewers go to shame the characters and the actors behind them just to prove their point? Where does one draw the line?
Note: Just because I've named Akshara as an example does not mean that I think Abhimanyu was not wrong. They have both made mistakes. I took her example because I feel that the writers have done a greater injustice to her character.
26