Originally posted by: Moor278
I agree..
P has got a lenient treatment compared to Sai..
And I know you are not personally attacking me...
But I have not justified V ka abuse... if you read my reviews... you would already know that I do point out his mistakes on a regular basis.
The excuses are the reasoning which I try to see... which doesn't make sense most of the time.
But for all intents and purposes... Sai is linked to V... as of now. So whatever he does has implications on her..there is no foreseeable escape... now with kids in picture. That's the reason I notice and analyse his actions.
And no I am not shipping Jags with Sai. That's too horrible. I am not convinced of why Sai even allows Jags with Saavi. I voiced my displeasure at the dress change episode... even though Jags by all accounts is a reformed guy. It's not safe, its not right and it's certainly not acceptable for a toddler to be with an unknown man unchapereaoned late at night and she comes back with a dress change 😔
As for the redemption... coming from your point... if Jags and P as antagonists can change, why not V as ML????
Counter this to how Ash has fallen... as much as I hate V ka character arc... I don't think I will be able to forgive her ... I have maintained that she doesn't deserve to be called Aai post Shruti track. But she is irrelevant to the story in the long run... it is V who matters and it is his redemption I will always wait for....
Until I quit totally 😭 or the show ends.
@Italic I agree sai allowing her daughter to interact with a person like jagtap is wrong. They didn't even give flashback to let audience know how jagtap got to know about sai, why sai allowed him near savi. But in recent episode, she slapped jagtap, asked him to get out of her and her daughter's life. So that kinda compensates her mistake to some extent.
@bold I kinda get it. We want to find reasons behind his disgusting actions to pacify ourselves. But it kinda gives makers confidence that no matter what he does, people will see his reasons not his actions as ml asked fans to do. And they don't even mind giving his reasons too. Not a single scene where it shows him feeling something positive about sai. It is only hate, disgust, anger from him. Other side sai angst can be seen. Even while leaving, she got flashback of virat, savi and her which shows she kinda want such happy family with him. But nothing from virat's side not even when he played her husband in a play. When makers themselves don't want to show virat side feelings for sai, why should we conclude his imaginary feelings when his actions prove otherwise.
Whether makers take feedback or not, we shouldn't increase their arrogance by trying to understand ml's unreasonable actions. It is makers work to convince audience about virat feelings for sai not audience business.
Virat actions don't deserve analysis. If we completely give up on him and discuss his actions as shown in episodes, then makers may get alert and try to work on their ml character.
By dialogues and scenes, it is confirm that they stalk twitter and forums to see feedback.
They should know making ml acceptable to audience is impossible, they should work on his character. But we are at a such where we would be grateful if they show virat uttering single sorry let alone his redemption.
That's why makers get upper hand. Trp definitely matters. But online audience feedback equally matters that's why they had to consider surrogacy complaints even for the sake of it.
Makers should know virat's actions are not acceptable just because he is ml and end game is sairat.
Edited by Kumuda-123 - 3 years ago