Originally posted by: nethraa_99
The issue is not about debating Virat, but about what the writers are trying to convey
During the KKHH moment ....I was pissed but didn't give it any importance. But when it is happening again, I'm disconcerted. Is there something writers are trying to show us - as much as it defies logic? As much as we can see Virat loves Sai? Can be brush the KKHH moment to be just Vankar's creativity? Or are they actually trying to hint that Virat still subconsciously enjoys Pakhi's attention? I don't know what to make of the poor writing - why include it if it was not supposed to convey anything? Once is mistake but twice?
Writing is everything - it can convey a message that they did not intend. Or it can be that they are indeed trying to hint at an obnoxious idea. Either way, bad, bad job.
I am with you on this. They need to up their game in all aspects, not just the writing. This was my problem with the stage hug/Paapi interruption too. People were attributing it to bad editing and saying that Virat ended the hug because he saw Ajinkya and was brought back to reality- and after watching the scene upwards of 20 times, I agree with that perspective now. BUT, the point is, that the editing should not have given us the impression that he ended the hug because of Paapi to begin with.
I really do not believe that they are hinting that Virat subconsciously enjoys Paapi's attention- otherwise, why would they give us all of those scenes of him avoiding her, making disgusted faces at her, and giving monologues that he only cares about Sai? Moreover, his actions show that Sai is the only woman in his life now.
The truth is that Vankar has always had an obsession with Paapi from the beginning of the show. So, while I too, am frustrated like you, I don't want to dwell on these moments, because it will drive me mad.