Hello All!
I assume none of you know me unless we’ve met in a previous forum). I’m generally not somebody who posts a lot (this is proved by the fact that my last post on IF was a year ago).
Today, a friend of mine opened my eyes and drove me to make this post. What she said was that “There’s no difference between Riddhima and Vansh.” A very simple statement. But, my automatic reaction was “Are you kidding me? Can’t you see he’s the player, she’s the pawn/dice/pillow?” But, friend’s words did make me start to contemplate.
Let me try to give a bit of background to this conversation. A lot of my friends and I have been watching Ishq Mein Marjawan 2 since the very beginning (I was drawn to it because it promised to have a different content – a romantic thriller). We tend to discuss and analyse the episodes after all of us have watched them. After the episode that aired day before yesterday, I was disheartened by Vansh’s actions (especially because I’d liked the portrayal of his character by the actor). My friend said I’m seeing only one side of the coin. My natural instinct was to argue and say “What is wrong is wrong!” I went further to state “Right to life includes right to dignity and Vansh was encroaching upon that”. I was agitated. How could Vansh do that to his beloved Riddhu (sorry, Rrahul for borrowing your endearment here), that too without her consent? I’d not considered that my words would come to bite/haunt me, that too this early. Why I say that. Riddhima (someone whose never give up attitude I’ve come to admire) today did the same. For what she thought was the right thing, she struck an innocent soul (the nurse). She in her mind apologised to the unconscious nurse, and by her actions proved that she too believes that the ends justify the means. What I still hadn’t realized was that this was not something that she was doing for the first time. My friend then said something which I had forgotten. Riddhima had struck Angre unconscious in order as she wanted to prove herself right when she’d been asked by Vansh to leave mansion (after the burning of Uma’s portrait fiasco).
I enjoy good fictions which include the genre of thrillers or adventures (my personal favourites being murder mysteries in books). An all time favourite character, detective Hercule Poirot has taught me that what is right is right and we should stand up for it. Today, my friend’s viewpoint made me think a bit more. I realized that Vansh and Riddhima are perhaps doing the same thing – fighting for what they believe is right. Vansh in my eyes was wrong to paralyse Riddhima (without her consent)and so was Riddhima when she struck an innocent bystander unconscious (without her consent). If I cannot condone Vansh’s action, I can’t be a hypocrite and condone/pardon Riddhima’s actions.
I also realized today that in the name of women’s rights, sometimes I’ve been a bit quick to judge some male characters. I’ve sometimes justified Maya (Mehrotra/ Jaisingh)’s actions (in Beyhadh 1/ 2),though I refused to give the same scope to Vansh day before yesterday and for that I stand corrected. If it was possible I would like to convey apologies to Vansh for not giving him the same chances I seem to give a lot of other characters. Vansh, over the years I’ve attempted to be a neutral viewer, and I’m sorry I wasn’t so with your character a lot of times.
I know a lot of you would think differently. That’s the beauty of life. We all have different perspectives and values and believe me I do respect those of each one of you. I hope a few of the members of this always-buzzing forum would like reading this post (whether they agree or disagree with the content). This post was meant to make a few of you think on a different line and nothing else. Do let me know your take or if my ramblings don’t make any sense.
I am not a writer by trade. And I do apologize to all of you for making such a long post, which you might find boring to read.
With warm wishes
Priya