Originally posted by: sammy17
That's exactly why they'll never show prachi working with sunny/disha; they want to keep the good guys near the evil trouble makers for the sake of melodrama and because they want to keep the two sisters and prachi-abhi near each other constantly. This wouldn't happen if she stays away from them and starts working with sunny and disha.
Plus I don't think sunny has his own business or anything like that and works a regular job given his mother works under a politician and is living in a company flat, else disha would have been shown a business woman.
Perhaps they'll show sunny as a suave, intelligent, strong personality, a high-achieving and focused individual who has made a good career for himself given he is the only support for his single mother so he would have matured and become very responsible unlike the rich spoiled brats like rhea and ranbir who get to play all day and moan and the prospect of having to be responsible.
To a greater extent, being poor makes you a better person than a rich person because poor people are able to learn how to be resilient to tough situations, self-sufficient, problem-solvers and appreciate/ not take things for granted always and learn the meaning of hard-work, whereas rich kids are deprived of the opportunity to learn basic life skills to be able to cope with problems on their own as they live in a bubble created by their rich parents who save their asses and make sure they don't work for anything.
Now of course not all rich families are like this, however I wish abhi would have been shown as less of a rubbish excuse for a parent and shown actually trying to teach rhea how to be independent and discipline her even if in contrast they continued to show her being influenced badly by aliya, but in the viewer's eye abhi is shown equally responsible as aliya for not giving rhea a good upbringing as he merely calls her out on her mistakes without ever giving real punishments/ discipline, spoils her rotten undeservedly even when she does bad things, molly-coddles her like a baby and worst of all, doesn't actually look after her or teach her anything as he leaves the responsibility of looking after her and teaching her morals to his criminal and evil sister.
Hence aliya herself is not to blame for what has become of rhea as abhi decided to keep rhea despite pragya wanting to take them both away, then didn't even try and become like a mother to rhea the way pragya has done what both a mother and father would do (honestly fathers don't do much compared to mothers besides giving you a family name and earning money for the children, but pragya did all that too), but even fathers are capable of teaching their children good morals yet abhi is merely shown over-looking her mistakes without punishment and providing her with a life of luxury. Why did he not let pragya take both girls if he can't act like a responsible father and actually take responsibility for making sure his child has a good upbringing? It's like that day keeping at least one of the girls was liking sharing property for him where he wanted an equal share and not feel left out. Children are not trophies, home decor etc to keep in your house for your satisfaction and happiness, but they are a commitment and responsiblity you have to pay attention to.
comment:
p_commentcount