Posted:
guyz if someone is purposely blinding themselves we dont need to pursuade them abt anything..if even after facts ppl dont want to belive this then ok its their opinion.
ITS BEEN A YEAR SINCE I AM IN THIS FORUM I WAS A SILENT READER., BUT TODAY AM QUITTING THE FORUM AND SHOW BECAUSE OF ITS INCREDIBILITY. DON'T BE AGITATTED ITS LOT MORE TO KNOW...THE HISTORICAL FACTS.
THERE WAS NO LOVE BETWEEN AKBAR AND MUZ/JODHA/HEER/HARKHA . POINTS SUPPORTING ARE...ok.fine.😊. Evidences speak themselves. I need not do so.!.🥱. Can't make everyone understand. If people tend to ignore.then..carry on dear.👍🏼Again this is a new theory.😊.BTW,, MUZ was Malika-E-Hindustan.SEarch account of any foreign traveller and he has mentioned this FACT. If possible search gov. archives also...
1- RUQAIYA WAS GIVEN THE TITLE OF PADSHAH BEGUM FOR HER ENTIRE LIFETIME.
This is not correct dear. And, what this proves..?😕..I don't know if you have read any Fan - fiction book or are talking of historical chronicles..!..
THE TITLE IS GIVEN TO FEMALE EQUIVALENT OF KING/ BADSHAH= TITLE OF MALIK-E-HINDUSTAN. MEANS THE MOST FAVOURED OR LOVED BEGUM.2- THE POWER OWNED BY MUZ WAS DUE TO HER BEING THE MOTHER OF HEIR APPARENT NOT SORT OF ANY LOVE BETWEEN HER AND AKBAR.
ok. You say No love...Theek hai..!.. (don't know why this LADY has so much problem in this century also.😕.)
BTW,
What will explain those palace(S) before Salim's birth.??.
The palace of Agra commenced in 1564..!.
What will explain those visits to Dargahs before Salim's birth..??
Why he did not take other begums often..??😊.
I can put more questions here, but that is not my motive😊
SECONDLY IT WAS THE POSITION IN AKBAR TIME STARTING FROM HIS FATHER HUMAYUN LIKE THE POSTHUMOUS TITLE OF HAMIDA BANO "MARIAM MAKANI" .
This was not posthumous title dear.😊.🥱..
HEERA WAS LUCKY TO BE MAIUM-UZ-ZAMANI.
ok..😆.For this what can i say.?..Can't make everyone understand..!. Neither i THINK, it's important.😊.
THIRDLY THE NO. OF CHILDREN OF MUZ AND AKBAR CANNOT BE THE MEASURE OF LOVE IT WAS MUZ'S PHENOMENAL BEAUTY WHICH ATTRACTED HIM OR HE USED HER SIMPLY.
Folks, if she gets 1 child , i.e. , Salim , ppl say Akbar was not devoted to her.😕
And, if she gets more children, then ppl say she was used.So all theories are against her only.👏.😕.
Though i don;t want to discuss on this "USE-MISUSE" issue. here..!..
BUT REALITY RUQAIYA AND HE WAS HAVING DIVINE relationship.
I never denied this, but any evidence. ????????????????????
Docs do give impression that she had standing BUT due to being a royal princess.
Infact, chronicles of Abul Fazl/ Badauni say that MUZ had imperial status.
They never talk of Ruqayya's DIVINITY, so how come you claim.😊FOURTH - RUQ DIED SIX YEAR,S LATER THAN MUZ
Yes she died later.but 3 years NOT 6.
AND SALIMA DIED DURING LIFE TIME OF AKBAR.
Who said so..?..She died around 1612, means 7 years after Akbar's death.🥱
SO AFTER AKBAR'S DEATH IT WAS MUZ😲 SO AS A MARK OF GRACE AND RESPECT FOR HER MOTHER JAHANGIR MADE HER REST NEAR HER HUSBAND.
This is a hatched story out of blue.😕. You are just saying anything..🤢. Need to read more.POST YOUR VIEWS TOO.
posted.😊
JA LOVE STORY REALITY PT-2
AS SOME OF U SAY ME 2 CNSLT ABHAY'S POST AND I WILL POST ABHAY'S RESEARCH AS ACCORDING TO HIM AKBAR ONCE SAID IT WAS SINFUL TO TAKE MORE THAN ONE WIFE UNLESS THE SPOUSE IS BARREN.
This is acc. to Akbar NOT me.
ABHAY JUSTIFIED THAT HE DID NOT NAME RUQAIYA BUT IN CASE NOT RUQAIYA THAN NOT ALSO JODHA OR MUZ.
I EXPLAIN IT HERE AS- 1- AKBAR WANTED TO MARRY ONLY TWICE FOR CHILD AS RUQAIYA WAS BARREN. MEANS THE OTHER BEGUMS WERE MERE ONLY CHILD PRODUCING MACHINES AND SEX TOY FOR HIM.
This is the language of Internet.👏.
Tell you what dear, Akbar said only 2 lines, and people could not understand the meaning.
To understand Akbar's thinking behind this reform, PEOPLE need to start from scratch..!.
More i can't explain to you dear.
Coz you claim to read MY thread and still spewing that same story, for clearing which i made that thread.
For certain people, Akbar was a sexual-predator only.
(These words are used by Abraham Eraly and then copied everywhere.)2. AFTER RUQAIYA THE POPULAR MATRIMONY WAS WITH SALIMA BEGUM AND SHE GAVE BIRTH TO MALE CHILD.Kudos..!!.👏.It seems you have counted the entire brood of Akbar..!..(which even best researchers here could not do with assurity "TILL NOW"..!..👏..)
P.S. --> Before claiming something, this big, please be sure.😊
3. THIS EXPLAINS HE DID NOT WANT HARKHA/JODHA AS SHE WAS BIWI NO.5 . AND OTHER JUNIOR BEGUMS BEFORE HER GAVE BIRTH TO CHILDREN.
Thnx for this. I feel indebted. Salutes..!..👏
Now you arrived at the CORE ISSUE for which this thread was created??.😊
That LADY faced so much opposition in that era also, and even after 400 years she continues to be at receiving end. 😕 Let her soul RIP.
BTW, decide dear , was she Begum number 5 or Begum number 3.?.😉😆😃(you have used both)😉
4. ACCORDING TO THE PHOTO SHARED BY THE FORUM- GLORY WITH FAITH AKBAR WITH MARIUM- UZ- ZAMANI BEGUM SHE IS SHOWN YOUNG AND AKBAR OLD BUT WE KNOW SHE WAS 22 DAYS OLDER THAN HER HUSBAND.
Great..Another shot..😕!!..Dear friend, please first read how the portraits were created in 16th century. 😃.?..I have already answered this on my threads. So, need not answer this here..
And, if you have read that thread, then you must be knowing that it was not original but an altered portrait.
BTW, do you know date of birth of MUZ?😉😃(don't tell me that its what written on Wikipedia and on Internet sites.😉)..!..
Also, it seems you know the disparity between Akbar's DOB which lead to his name being Badr-ud-din to Jalal-ud-din.😉
Coz after knowing both the above things, can one tell that she was 22 days old/young whatever...!...😉.
THE PHOTO IS TO CONVEY SEXUAL DESIRE AND NEEDS OF THE EMPEROR THAT HE USED HER FOR PLEASURE AND RESULT THE CHILDREN THEY HAD.
New explanation.👏🥱
P.S. --> Kindly use decent language.!!. 😊
How can you say he used her for pleasure.!.
Also, the portrait presents a DIVINE meaning ---> "Glory of Faith", and you are taking out such a zilch idea out of it.!.😕. .
5. U SPK OF FREEDOM ENJOYED BY HARKHA/MUZ BUT FRM THE FORUM ONLY I CAME TO KNOW SHE WAS GIVEN THE NAME WALI- NI- MAT BEGUM MEANS SHE ACCEPTED ISLAM OR CONVERTED AND ALSO SHOWN BY THE PHOTO . AND SHE WAS BURIED NOT CREMATED THEN HOW COULD U SPK OF OFFICIAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.
Dear, from 100's of pages of this forum, you came to know only one thing,🥱 that she was given the title of Wali-Ni'maat, and hence she changed her religion .!.😲😕😆
BTW, the photo shows that she accepted Islam.😕?😲?..Till date various scholars of ASI and Gov. Of India, could not conclude so. And, here we got an instant conclusion.>>??...👏
Probably, you missed one info that is ::😃
" There is mention of 144 revolts in chronicles, out of which more than 72 revolts happened due to Akbar's acceptance of beliefs of Hinduism, allowing it to be practiced in close😉 Hindu circle."
There is explicit mention of Jalal praying with Jodha, and participating in her prayers also.
This is also given by our "fan-fiction" author Eraly also😆, whose book people read as some religious text..🥱
Today also, Diwan-i- Khas, which Akbar constructed in Fatehpur Sikri, has a Hindu Chamber for worshipping in the west corner of the building, on the first floor. This was used for worshipping. Mentioning this, coz this evidence survives till date.
Dear buddy,
Please read that, she wished to have a resting place near her hubby and NO OTHER BEGUM expressed such a desire.!.
The honoured Ruqayya Sultana Begum, was buried at Gardens of Babur in Afghanistan.
And, Salima Begum at her own garden .!.
Why did not they wished so .?
And, MUZ did so despite being a Krishna devotee throughout her life..?..😊
let me clarify does sexual relation between man and woman is out of love, then no divorcee would have children . he used for sexual pleasure and it is a historical fact that akbar was very much fond of women. muz was lucky enough to have delivered a surviving boy so she was bound to hold muz title
Ayooo Jalal used HK because of her beauty 😭
Ye padne se pehle meri internet connection cut kyun nahi hoi gawaa😭
Originally posted by: ---Khushi---
Looks like a rival channel post 😆
Originally posted by: akdhadeewaanii
shraddha di...🤣
mere bhi kuch yhi hal tha..😕😕
comment:
p_commentcount