Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 opens bigger than Singham in the morning shows..BOI - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

76

Views

3.5k

Users

26

Likes

132

Frequent Posters

you2 thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 21 days ago
#51

Today SA sold more tickets on BMS than BB3..and may just cross it's yesterday's total ..very likely. That is very good hold..after a big holiday.

BB3 is seeing a drop so far..

AbjiniRockss thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 5

Thriller Tribe

Posted: 21 days ago
#52

Originally posted by: you2

Today SA sold more tickets on BMS than BB3..and may just cross it's yesterday's total ..very likely. That is very good hold..after a big holiday.

BB3 is seeing a drop so far..

According to Sacnilk estimate,SA is 30 crores and BB 3 is 27 crores based on evening shows occupancy night shows are still to be counted

Posted: 21 days ago
#53

Originally posted by: diasingh2

Kartik is a weak actor but I appreciate him for his efforts to at least trying to do different roles like Dhamaka , Freddy and Chandu Champion and balancing it out with films like BB3.

I personally want BB3 to end up becoming a bigger hit than Singham Returns. I want the latter to flop really badly for some reason.smiley35

I guess I am annoyed because Khans/Devgan/Kumar have milked their "superstardom" to the point that its disgusting and eye-rolling. smiley29 They are ~60 years old for GOD's sake.smiley44 They should either gracefully retire or permanently shift to doing character roles like Amitabh did.

The angry young men (Amitabh, Dharmendra, Jitendra, Vinod, Mithun, Rishi etc) had to eventually give up by early-to-mid 90s, because the audience turned to the younger lot of actors. I am desperately waiting for a similar kind of shift in Bollywood. I hope it happens by the end of this decade.

I’m sorry but I don’t think this is valid reason that the movie should not do well. The movie being nonsense or torture makes sense. I mean why should viewers care whether someone older still wants to do movies or star kids ? As these I see getting targeted my Bollywood members and other on other social media. Whereas the majority general audience just don’t plain care. They don’t like something they simply don’t watch. Kumar and now devgan this year released so many movies noe say Kumar decided todo zillion movies why should that matter ? When I can simply ignore not watching the movies. Seriously who are we to tell what others should do or not do? Why not lashing out now that Sunny paaji is having second innings with Gardar 2 or Bobby deol ? Though Sunny is better example as he’s signed movies as lead. I mean age shaming be it actor or actress on my opinion isn’t valid reason. In Hollywood n the south older actors still working as leads as well. Look at Tom cruise on Hollywood or rajni in the south. I think even the women who older should do lead movies like on Hollywood ( though in Bollywood it’s not as much accepted but still they should and tabu is the best example).
you2 thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 21 days ago
#54

Originally posted by: AbjiniRockss

According to Sacnilk estimate,SA is 30 crores and BB 3 is 27 crores based on evening shows occupancy night shows are still to be counted

Possible. This is only the hourly data on tickets sold on BMS. That is the only data available to the public

Posted: 21 days ago
#55

Originally posted by: AbjiniRockss

https://boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=8771

Isn't 35-37 crores low for Singham Again with a big popular cast and budget.BB 3 gave a good competition to Singham Again I will say.Also why other sites are reporting both the movies of having higher opening than what BOI reported.Is BOI more authentic or other websites are

boi reporting is lower because they get their data their way ( they the oldest in the business) others like Taran get it via the producers not on their own. Saicnaik which is new who knows how they get it and they seem to be the middle ground between the two at times. To me and said it many times they all useless and lack credibility but what todo numbers got to be reported. Until they get one reliable source it is what it is smiley37
you2 thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 21 days ago
#56

Both films seem to be holding up

Screenshot_20241102-201606~2.png

Grumpydwarf24 thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 21 days ago
#57

Happy for Tripti! I wish she had a better role though.

diasingh2 thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 21 days ago
#58

Originally posted by: wat_up

I’m sorry but I don’t think this is valid reason that the movie should not do well. The movie being nonsense or torture makes sense. I mean why should viewers care whether someone older still wants to do movies or star kids ? As these I see getting targeted my Bollywood members and other on other social media. Whereas the majority general audience just don’t plain care. They don’t like something they simply don’t watch. Kumar and now devgan this year released so many movies noe say Kumar decided todo zillion movies why should that matter ? When I can simply ignore not watching the movies. Seriously who are we to tell what others should do or not do? Why not lashing out now that Sunny paaji is having second innings with Gardar 2 or Bobby deol ? Though Sunny is better example as he’s signed movies as lead. I mean age shaming be it actor or actress on my opinion isn’t valid reason. In Hollywood n the south older actors still working as leads as well. Look at Tom cruise on Hollywood or rajni in the south. I think even the women who older should do lead movies like on Hollywood ( though in Bollywood it’s not as much accepted but still they should and tabu is the best example).

I have no problems with actors working after a certain age, as long as they evolve. Biggest Examples are Amitabh, Tabu, Bobby Deol etc

And you can't bracket Khans with Tabu btw. Sexist audience will never put a female star on a pedastal like they have done with SRK/Sallu.

Ajay is doing great but I still don't see the sincerity because there is no reason for a film lile Singham Again to exist today, unless its a cashgrab scheme, which it is.

There is no denying that they all hwve immensely contributed to Bollywood with their work, and they are legends but they have been milking their superstardom for years now. I miss the balanced stardom that these stars had in the 90s and 2000s. There were bad quality films even then, but at least there was no "superstar" back then, juicing his image to the point that it becomes dry. Amitabh tried that and failed.

Regarding quality, I am sorry but all of Sunny Deol's "comeback" films are all even bigger cash grab schemes than BB3 (that people are accusing the films for).m And so are these "Cop Universe", " Spy Universe" etc based films, particularly the ones starring these "superstar".

Edited by diasingh2 - 21 days ago
you2 thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 21 days ago
#59

BB3 sold 120k more tickets than SA at pre sales on Book My Show.

BB3 sold 20k tickets more on Friday.

BB3 sold 25k tickets LESS on Saturday.

The only verifiable data that we have.

Screenshot_20241103-081703~2.png

you2 thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 20 days ago
#60
Top