Ha ha...no, we saw the same movie, only our perception/view differs
I don't think that the movie really questions the importance of visa in our times, but tries to incite discussion about ways to change the getting-a-visa options.
Dunki shows very clearly that the current options are prone to either getting people exploited or making them doing illegal things - both objectionable.
It is a kind of criticism pointing to the inflexibility of current Visa-laws and to the lack of proper consulting and finding of other solutions.
I remember that in december after Dunki's release, we had discussions here about the laws.
As for Manu and her two friends earning money through working in the town, it had been shown that they had work, right at the beginning ... Sukhi obviously also earned money as he would have been capable to pay one flight for him to London and one back for both of them. (I don't know why he didn't try with a tourist visa...maybe there was a reason why that wouldn't have worked)...Hardy hadn't planned to stay, he just wanted to give back the tape recorder.
comment:
p_commentcount