Who is right in the Kangana-Hrithik controversy? - Page 6

Originally posted by: Guddu.Pandit

How do you know? 😆

Achanak se itna intense debate shuru kiya toh laga ki kahi Rajat Sharma ji catalyst honge 😆

Originally posted by: FlyOnTheWall

Ek point tha jab pura Bollywood fandom aur bahut sare Bollywood stars openly Kangana ko support kiye the against Hrithik

Jab wo nepotism wala issue boli thi to bhi usko sabka support mila

Baat ye hai ki ya to aap hero ban sakte ho ya aap unke jaise ban jate ho jinko aap hate karte ho

Kangana was bullied jo bhi hua uske sath lekin ye sab usko license nahi deta ki wo dusron ki life kharab kare

Hrithik ne pure mamle me hamesha dignity maintain ki hai

Wo clearly bola hai ki uska iske sath koi relationship nahi tha

Saba koi big actress nahi hai, Kangana se to Kam hi successful hai lekin mai to nahi dekha Hrithik ko apna relationship hide karte hue

Kangana bol di matlab sach nahi hota hai

agree, lekin iske liye bahut strong hona padta hain, jiske liye either you need to be individually strong or have a strong support system, she had neither and obviously has a strong destructive and negative streak

regarding saba vs kangana, i disagree, it is not about succcessful or not, it is about belonging to the inner circle

saba is related to safdar hashmi, jan natya manch, she has intellectual, arty pedigree like shabana, konkona etc

kangana because of her accent, english, small town origin, the route she took (aditya pancholi association, who himself is c grade), she was always downmarket, crass and to put it crudely she was good for a under cover fling but not GF/wife material for the upper circles of BW

as lots of others said, i also think it was a fling, nothing serious for hrithik, but for kangana it was not

as somebody rightly said (an you also say) her desperation to be part of the upper and in circles of bollywood led to her associations with hrithik or ajay

frankly, she would have been better off finding somebody maybe little less successful but respectful (like Kat or Nayantara, of course they are both not disturbed like Kangana)

the sad part as you said she had support and could have been much more, but she became too toxic by then and is down the path of destruction so even that is lost

Originally posted by: FlyOnTheWall

Kangana ka life kaise ruin kiya Hrithik? Kangana ke pas puri ruling party ka pahuch hai, Amit Shah ko call karke help leti hai wo

Hrithik se pange chhod ke Maharashtra government se pange le rahi thi

Farmers ko terrorist bol rahi thi

Ek community ke against hate tweets karti thi twitter pe to twitter ban kar diya

Kangana ko jitna support tha nepotism movement ke time MeToo movement ke time

Mai khud support Kiya tha usko against Hrithik, sab log support kiye the

Lekin usne apna reality sabko dikha diya

Mai ye discussion seriously nahi le raha kyonki merko pata hai iska motive kya hai

Samajh nahi aaya??

Originally posted by: TheekThaak

Achanak se itna intense debate shuru kiya toh laga ki kahi Rajat Sharma ji catalyst honge 😆

Ye Sharma kaun hai?

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

ab kya batayein yaar?😆

kiya to kiya. Itna kyoon ro raha hai HR😆

Hr new movie coming it seems , so I am applying for hr’s pr 😆

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

Lol toxicity. Havent seen that word used so much anywhere else. 😆She is against nepotism, against establishment, against a mandate stealing udhav thakeray, against the casting couch power elite, supports a govt that was elected twice by a lot of Indians.. and she is toxic? Ok😆

she has stood on lots of great issues and the whole focus on nepotism is her doing

but unfortunately she has done to others what she has suffered, her behavior with director krish, writer apurva, hansal mehta was not done

she now seems to go at anybody and everybody and in any war you have to build allies

she can be much more if she does this

maybe if not toxic whatever suits this

Originally posted by: Guddu.Pandit

Ye Sharma kaun hai?

Rajat Sharma is the host of Aap ki Adalat, nation's sensation. Balasaheb se lekar Yogi ji tak, Owaisi se lekar Amit Shah tak, sab jaate hai uske show pe. Aap ki Adalat dekhna mera favourite time pass hua karta tha ek time par. 😆

Originally posted by: vcs17

agree, lekin iske liye bahut strong hona padta hain, jiske liye either you need to be individually strong or have a strong support system, she had neither and obviously has a strong destructive and negative streak

regarding saba vs kangana, i disagree, it is not about succcessful or not, it is about belonging to the inner circle

saba is related to safdar hashmi, jan natya manch, she has intellectual, arty pedigree like shabana, konkona etc

kangana because of her accent, english, small town origin, the route she took (aditya pancholi association, who himself is c grade), she was always downmarket, crass and to put it crudely she was good for a under cover fling but not GF/wife material for the upper circles of BW

as lots of others said, i also think it was a fling, nothing serious for hrithik, but for kangana it was not

as somebody rightly said (an you also say) her desperation to be part of the upper and in circles of bollywood led to her associations with hrithik or ajay

frankly, she would have been better off finding somebody maybe little less successful but respectful (like Kat or Nayantara, of course they are both not disturbed like Kangana)

the sad part as you said she had support and could have been much more, but she became too toxic by then and is down the path of destruction so even that is lost

Maine pahle bhi kaha hai ki Hrithik has more to lose kyonki wo court me likh ke diya hai ki uska Kangana ke sath relationship nahi tha

Agar kisi ka bhi 6 years long relationship raha ho to usko prove karna difficult nahi hai

Kangana easily prove kar sakti hai ki they were in relationship aur upar se agar Hrithik usko shadi ka vaada karke fayda uthaya to criminal case bhi banta hai Hrithik par

Ye mera stand hai is matter me kyonki legal matter hai to waise hi sochna hai, smoke without fire bhi work karta hai court me kyonki circumstantial evidence bhi accept kar lega court

Kangana is not poor, Kangana ke paas bahut bada support system hai, to ye baat bhi nahi ki wo legal battle nahi lad pa rahi, uske paas sab available hai wo khud boli ki Amit Shah uski help karta hai

Ye to legal matter finish

Abhi public eye me, jab ye issue naya tha tab sabne support Kiya Kangana ko, Sonam Kapoor aur dusri actresses bhi openly support di thi usko pura public perception uske favour me tha

Ye change hua jab hamne uska behaviour dekha with everyone

Abhi mai usko excuse nahi karunga because of her past

Originally posted by: TheekThaak

Rajat Sharma is the host of Aap ki Adalat, nation's sensation. Balasaheb se lekar Yogi ji tak, Owaisi se lekar Amit Shah tak, sab jaate hai uske show pe. Aap ki Adalat dekhna mera favourite time pass hua karta tha ek time par. 😆

Never heard of him. Thanks for the information.

Originally posted by: FlyOnTheWall

Maine pahle bhi kaha hai ki Hrithik has more to lose kyonki wo court me likh ke diya hai ki uska Kangana ke sath relationship nahi tha

Agar kisi ka bhi 6 years long relationship raha ho to usko prove karna difficult nahi hai

Kangana easily prove kar sakti hai ki they were in relationship aur upar se agar Hrithik usko shadi ka vaada karke fayda uthaya to criminal case bhi banta hai Hrithik par

Ye mera stand hai is matter me kyonki legal matter hai to waise hi sochna hai, smoke without fire bhi work karta hai court me kyonki circumstantial evidence bhi accept kar lega court

Kangana is not poor, Kangana ke paas bahut bada support system hai, to ye baat bhi nahi ki wo legal battle nahi lad pa rahi, uske paas sab available hai wo khud boli ki Amit Shah uski help karta hai

Ye to legal matter finish

Abhi public eye me, jab ye issue naya tha tab sabne support Kiya Kangana ko, Sonam Kapoor aur dusri actresses bhi openly support di thi usko pura public perception uske favour me tha

Ye change hua jab hamne uska behaviour dekha with everyone

Abhi mai usko excuse nahi karunga because of her past

yeh, 6 yrs ka nahin tha, it was a short lived fling and koi evidence nahin tha

i agree she would have gone berserk if she had evidence