Originally posted by: MowPow
And my reaponse was to your preaching about constitutional rights but when i talked about kamlesh tiwari and Harsh you feign ignorance. They were indians who were killed in india and not in any ISIS territory, for doing what you were advocating here .
Looks to me that your strategy was to put likes of nathu and zeal of backfoot and keep them busy explaining themselves over silly things while giving leeway to the otherside. And it worked too... for a while....😆
Trust me, I don't come to post on IF with any strategy.
You asked me why I didn't address other communities, and I gave you an answer that I was only responding to the comments about being bothered by muslim's belief on kaafirs going to hell.
I also said I did respond in threads about hijab issue, Islamic terrorism
You're now objecting because I didn't respond to EVERY ill in the community. You brought up the beheadings; no one else did for me or anyone else to respond to. Which, btw, I was not aware of. I don't live in India.
Besides, I already said when thought leads to illegal action, response should be there. And I said over and over my comment was only about the thought involved in the religion that theirs is the only true god.
Since we're talking strategy, yours seems to be to derail the convo and to justify the concept of thought crimes. That concept among the muslim extremists is what leads to terrorism. You're in the beginning of that spectrum, and they're at the other end.
Anyway, I have no intention on wasting a beautiful Sunday on people who don't do good-faith arguments, so ciao.
Edited by HearMeRoar - 2 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount