Posted:
I was reading somewhere that 5 stars Hotels and private hospitals have collaborated for VIP treatment.
You always can get acess easily if you pay premium money unlike common people. They are doing nothing wrong
I was reading somewhere that 5 stars Hotels and private hospitals have collaborated for VIP treatment.
You always can get acess easily if you pay premium money unlike common people. They are doing nothing wrong
Originally posted by: desigal90
There isn't any high quality data on Remdesivir either. The only statistically significant proven modalities in treatment of severe Covid are steroids when you are oxygen dependent on 02 days fall 94 or below. That's show to reduce mortality about a 1/3 in hospitalized and intubated patients. Other modalities are just in trial basis. Basically due to lack of other effective treatments and if steroids alone are ineffective physicians are basically at the point where they just try anything.
So then we agree that - "We do not use ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 outside of clinical trials, as with other interventions that are not supported by high-quality data, consistent with recommendations from the WHO" - was not quite the case since your country has allowed dispensing Big Pharma's worthless and dangerous (kidneys & liver) drug Remdesivir that the WHO specifically warned against using.
While ivermectin - which has been recognized as one of the safest drugs on the planet for over 30 years - was recently mass distributed in Delhi during this latest COVID surge, and in short order collapsed COVID cases back down to the baseline from "24,000 daily at end of April to 1,491 yesterday":
covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=760.msg1402#msg1402
Which should be no surprise since a similar graph shows it accomplished the same through mass distribution in 8 Peruvian States last summer:
covidtreatmentoptions.com/#ivermectin
Next I'll address the rest of your post before this one and the latest "study" by the WHO.
Originally posted by: desigal90
Data on ivermectin for COVID-19 are of low quality. In a meta-analysis of 16 trials evaluating ivermectin
Dr. Pierre Kory addressed one such study by pointing out that they selected only the weakest studies for their "meta-analysis" and discarded the strongest (including one of their own), and eliminated altogether the studies that showed ivermectin's stunning efficacy as prophylaxis. As made obvious by the fact that there are "...93 studies, 55 peer reviewed, 56 with results comparing treatment and control groups." Which are nearly unanimous in demonstrating ivermectin's stunning efficacy for preventing and treating COVID.
c19ivermectin.com
While another "Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified."
covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=837.0
Originally posted by: desigal90 (only four included patients with severe disease),
Which is the same way the WHO demonized hydroxychloroquine in the Solidarity Trial. Take a bunch of nearly dead patients and give them HCQ, long after the virus was done replicating and the patient had entered the inflammatory stage in reaction to dead viral debris, and then say "gee it didn't work!". Not only that, they used fatally toxic dosing (4 times that typically used in COVID treatment) so they could say "Gee, they even had a higher death rate!".
covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=363.0
All anti-virals work best when taken immediately upon the onset of symptoms or clinical suspicion of COVID-19. The longer a person waits, the less successful they can expect an anti-viral to be. Dr. Brian Tyson risk stratified 19,000 COVID ill, and early-treated 1,700 elderly and high-risk individuals on an outpatient basis with HCQ+zinc+azithromycin. His patients enjoyed a rate of 0 deaths and only 1 hospitalization of 4 days. He and his team have since successfully treated over 5,000 patients.
covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=359.0
Competent medical professionals have enjoyed the same kind of success, with the same protocol, all over the world ever since March of 2020.
Originally posted by: desigal90 the effects on mortality, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and duration of hospitalization were all very uncertain because of limitations in trial design and low numbers of events [38]. In a retrospective review of 280 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, receipt of ivermectin was associated with a lower mortality rate; however, patients who received ivermectin were also more likely to receive corticosteroids, highlighting the potential for confounders to impact the findings of nonrandomized studies [137]. Ivermectin had originally been proposed as a potential therapy based on in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2; however, the drug levels used in the in vitro studies far exceed those achieved in vivo with safe drug doses [138]. We reserve use of ivermectin for prevention of Strongyloides reactivation in select individuals receiving glucocorticoids Talented knowledgeable clinicians have not only had the same success with ivermectin in early treatment as Tyson did with HCQ. c19ivermectin.com/#early But also as prophylaxis, with reductions in infections of health care workers running in the 80 and 90 percents, as compared to control groups: c19ivermectin.com/#prep But ivermectin also has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties that allow it to have efficacy through all stages of COVID-19. Here's a typical account by early pioneers with ivermectin in the U.S., from April of 2020, of a patient that was about to go on a vent: "The blood oxygen level of the first patient treated in early April was 70%, and dropped to just 50% within hours. After receiving the invermectin, the patient stabilized within 24 hours and was discharged from the hospital in one week." There are many studies that attest to ivermectin's efficacy even in later inpatient treatment: c19ivermectin.com/#late
I have no issues with the pix... But the easy access. It's not just them but politicians and as well the hospital staff.
The so called doctors and nurses have saved vaccine for them and their family for the second dose as well. I think it's really shameful and disgusting what they are doing (not all, but most of them). Apne families and relatives ke liye second dose bhi save up while the 45+ ones forst dose leke second dose ke liye keep running helter skelter.
This I got to know when a close colleague told me right when the 18+ was allowed. Me and the rest of us were hunting and she baato baato mein bol diya. Then some else also confirmed the same about this going on in many hospitals.
I wish they would have done it area wise... Such unfair mismanagement and bhagam daudi nahi hoti.
| topics | author | replies | views | reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| oyebollywood | 9 | 1k | ||
| oyebollywood | 12 | 1.2k | ||
| BhataktiJawani | 11 | 1.2k | ||
| naaznin | 7 | 590 | ||
| fazgostoso | 38 | 2.1k |
comment:
p_commentcount