Originally posted by: Tippy-top
What you are trying to say is Indira Gandhi was something very very important and a bliss on earth and that a person like Sushant was a mere actor to be taken for granted on certain things like not to name a street after him as he was something mere.
Man that is the problem with people like you taking someone for granted. You are giving importance to a status someone has in a society, not to humanity.
He was so good at academics and an Indian who owned a land on moon that we got to know only after his death. Indira Gandhi was those who live by the gun, die by the gun.
lmao. what?
Indira Gandhi made a huge mark in history and is the only female Prime Minister India has ever had. Regardless of what you think of her politics, she had a massive contribution in the idea of India.
Sushant was just an actor and not even a huge one that had enormous impact on people with his art. His impact is his suicide and there's something cringe about naming a street after him because of that. It just shows the foolishness of the people asking for it and the people in government approving it.
Nobody is allowed to own land on the moon. It's a scam that people pay money for or maybe they do it as a joke.
As for humanity, in that case we should start naming roads after our parents and grandparents and best friends. Everyone I know is "good in academics." So what? It's really not a big deal.
comment:
p_commentcount