Ankita Lokhande plants trees in memory of Sushant Singh Rajput - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

84

Views

9k

Users

41

Likes

346

Frequent Posters

kyapa thumbnail
Anniversary 5 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#51

That’s what his fans should do too ❤️

ponymo thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 4 years ago
#52

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar


She *is* to be blamed for procuring it for him. Ie, giving it to him. Neither she nor SSR was a child at the time. He is to be blamed for taking them. 2 different actions.


The drug chat before she met SSR would mean she was buying it for someone else as well. Unless she's going to again claim she was doing it for love, she procured it in return for cash or kind.


In fact, NCB has stated they're looking at peddlers, not users. Rhea was arrested by them. #shrugs It isn't difficult to connect the dots.

She procured it for him or anyone, it doesn't matter. The problem is she procured it. When it was not her, others may have been procuring it, like the house manager, cook, and Showik.

No it isn't as simple connecting the dots when you know the agencies are out to get her any which way. None of the evidence so far proves that she was peddling. She was only buying/using.

And again, peddling is selling, not buying. She hasn't done any selling.

D_ancing_fox thumbnail
Group Promotion 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#53

This may sound irrelevant but I feel bad for these girls... Kriti has not said much and she has been receiving social media backlash for maintaining her silence... on the other hand Ankita who has been vocal regarding her support for Sushant and his family, recieving backlash as well for being 'extra vocal'. She has been called an attention seeker.. SAD....we all deal with pain differently... Both of them were closely associated with Sushant..specifically Ankita..she was with him for more than 7 years...

And we are nothing but mere spectators..we won't get what they are going through..

1123225 thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#54

Originally posted by: ponymo

She procured it for him or anyone, it doesn't matter. The problem is she procured it. When it was not her, others may have been procuring it, like the house manager, cook, and Showik.

No it isn't as simple connecting the dots when you know the agencies are out to get her any which way. None of the evidence so far proves that she was peddling. She was only buying/using.

And again, peddling is selling, not buying. She hasn't done any selling.


https://thelogicalindian.com/amp/trending/rhea-chakraborty-drug-charges-arrested-23606


To summarize:


Section 20(B) - produces, manufactures, possesses, sells, purchases, transports, imports inter-State, exports inter-State or uses cannabis, shall be punishable.

Section 27(A) - Consuming a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance that includes cocaine, morphine, diacetylmorphine or any other narcotic drug/psychotropic substance, is specified in this section.

Section 28 - punishment for any offender slapped with the NDPS Act.

Section 29 - Punishment for abetment and criminal conspiracy.

______


These are the charges slapped on Rhea. The judge refused bail because of possibility she might influence others.


NCB might be wrong, of course. But if charges are anything to go by, they do believe she was guilty of more than merely "buying weed" for SSR.


Also, Logical Indian is not a right wing site.

Edited by HearMeRoar - 4 years ago
bips thumbnail
Anniversary 19 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 4 years ago
#55

I don't get this. One girl is mocked for doing too much. The other for not doing enough.


Bachcha tha kya woh. Sab galti doosron ki hai.. Uska toh koi dimaag hi nahin tha


Why should ankita have reached out to him after breakup? Tab clingy aur desperate nahin hoti kya? And letting her stay in the joint property was obviously a mutual decision.


Same for rhea. Has anyone tried stopping a loved from from doing something that 'might' might be harmful? Most of the times bas jhagda hi hota hai.


And btw has this even been established that weed is bad for mental health to the extent of pushing someone to suicide? Kuch aur nahin mila toh grasping on straws


Bas dono ladkiyan chalu. Kha gayi ladke ko.

1123225 thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#56

Originally posted by: bips

I don't get this. One girl is mocked for doing too much. The other for not doing enough.


Bachcha tha kya woh. Sab galti doosron ki hai.. Uska toh koi dimaag hi nahin tha


Why should ankita have reached out to him after breakup? Tab clingy aur desperate nahin hoti kya? And letting her stay in the joint property was obviously a mutual decision.


Same for rhea. Has anyone tried stopping a loved from from doing something that 'might' might be harmful? Most of the times bas jhagda hi hota hai.


And btw has this even been established that weed is bad for mental health to the extent of pushing someone to suicide? Kuch aur nahin mila toh grasping on straws


Bas dono ladkiyan chalu. Kha gayi ladke ko.


Once again, charges on Rhea are not that she gave weed to a patient with mental health issues.


This is what she has been slapped with:


Section 20(B) - produces, manufactures, possesses, sells, purchases, transports, imports inter-State, exports inter-State or uses cannabis, shall be punishable.

Section 27(A) - Consuming a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance that includes cocaine, morphine, diacetylmorphine or any other narcotic drug/psychotropic substance, is specified in this section.

Section 28 - punishment for any offender slapped with the NDPS Act.

Section 29 - Punishment for abetment and criminal conspiracy.


At this point, it is not mere public opinion. These are legal charges.

Edited by HearMeRoar - 4 years ago
FruitToasty thumbnail
Anniversary 7 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#57

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar


Once again, charges on Rhea are not that she gave weed to a patient with mental health issues.


This is what she has been slapped with:


Section 20(B) - produces, manufactures, possesses, sells, purchases, transports, imports inter-State, exports inter-State or uses cannabis, shall be punishable.

Section 27(A) - Consuming a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance that includes cocaine, morphine, diacetylmorphine or any other narcotic drug/psychotropic substance, is specified in this section.

Section 28 - punishment for any offender slapped with the NDPS Act.

Section 29 - Punishment for abetment and criminal conspiracy.


At this point, it is not mere public opinion. These are legal charges.

Do you have copy of charge sheet?

1123225 thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#58

Originally posted by: FruitToasty

Do you have copy of charge sheet?


If you're asking for court documents, you should be aware if I were in a position to have access, I'd also be held liable for any public release without permission.


I can point you to reliable news sources which practice journalism, not sensationalism. If you think these are all lying, and NCB went after Rhea for merely for purchasing for one-person use, then God bless, and believe what you will.


https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/rhea-chakraborty-drugs-ndps-act-sushant-singh-rajput-6590370/


https://thelogicalindian.com/amp/trending/rhea-chakraborty-drug-charges-arrested-23606


https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/forced-confessions-quizzed-by-male-officers-rhea-chakraborty-seeks-bail/story-njgg7EohHz4T6sT0Og50kJ.html


There are a few more, but they seem to be more or less same as above 3.

Edited by HearMeRoar - 4 years ago
HelloHiBye_Bye thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#59

She has a beautiful big heart. One thing j liked about both of them was they were bad mouthed each other after brkup, infact they were respectful.

I wish Ani and Sush were always together, he'd be alive then....

FruitToasty thumbnail
Anniversary 7 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#60

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar


If you're asking for court documents, you should be aware if I were in a position to have access, I'd also be held liable for any public release without permission.


I can point you to reliable news sources which practice journalism, not sensationalism. If you think these are all lying, and NCB went after Rhea for merely for purchasing for one-person use, then God bless, and believe what you will.


https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/rhea-chakraborty-drugs-ndps-act-sushant-singh-rajput-6590370/


https://thelogicalindian.com/amp/trending/rhea-chakraborty-drug-charges-arrested-23606


https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/forced-confessions-quizzed-by-male-officers-rhea-chakraborty-seeks-bail/story-njgg7EohHz4T6sT0Og50kJ.html


There are a few more, but they seem to be more or less same as above 3.


I am not asking for court documents, I am asking for a charge-sheet because you are claiming that Rhea has been charged by NCB

As far as I know this information is from remand application and Rhea is being investigated under those charges, NCB has not filed any charge sheet unless they did and I am not aware of it hence asked you to provide the copy


The case is not even at trial stage and people are ready with their judgements 😆

Edited by FruitToasty - 4 years ago
Top