Song in Guide was first feminist anthem: Waheeda Rehman - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

38

Views

4.9k

Users

20

Likes

126

Frequent Posters

return_to_hades thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: ibelieveinpink


And the biggest actresses of today are so content playing flowerpot roles. It's such a regression especially when there's more liberation today and females can actually command more power.


I think cinema slowly started regressing in the eighties. Men dominated the industry and films. Women became more like romantic props and accessories. The masala film resurgence made heroes larger than life and heroines as flowerpots.

Vidya Balan (post Heyy Baby & Kismat Konnection) is one of the few who has tried her best to steer clear of becoming a flowerpot. Another reason why I like Sonam is that she has avoided flowerpot roles and created a chick flick niche for herself. Kalki is another phenomenal actress with good roles, but she falls outside the conventional Bollywood umbrella.
you2 thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago
#22
Rosie(Waheeda) had an adulterous relationship with the Guide(Dev Anand)
Waheeda Ji perhaps was one of the earliest..There have been many such roles since then.

The most shocking was "Log kya kahenge" Shabana Azmi murders her step son when he sees her in bed with her lover!
ibelieveinpink thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago
#23
@Atom: yup. I think that's so pathetic though. I don't wanna say women of today aren't trail-blazers b/c like someone mentioned Vidya and Sonam are good examples, and Anushka too now. And there are actresses that are married with children that demand bounded scripts, top billing, etc. But if we compare their filmography to that of Nutan and Waheeda...it pails. Kajol played it safe through her whole career, Kareena immense powerhouse of talent picked projects based on the hero, Karishma and Urmila started doing more daring projects towards the end of their careers. It was more like they were content till those roles started running out and they have to search for new avenues. It wasn't a conscious choice, IMO. I always felt that amount of freedom women have in society doesn't translate well into BW, which amazes me b/c they're all such elitists.
@RTH: One thing I've noticed is that the 80s parallel the early 2000s in BW. There was an immense influence of HW/Western culture. I remember seeing so much Michael Jackson and Latin music incorporated into the club setting. The film-making style shifted away from what it was and people started making for "western" projects. But they failed to incorporate strong female characters. I still think the 90s did a better job of bringing back strong female roles like Damini, Gupt, Akele Hum Akele Tum, but most of the 90s and BW post 2008 has been production of big budget masala films with the Khans. It's like a step forward and then 2 steps back. And in between we'll get an occassional Black or Kahani.
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#24
Hetal

I don't think 80s can be judged entirely male centric. If we had masala cinema, we also had films like Chaalbaaz, Chandni, all those Smita Patil/Shabana Azmi films in same era.
Though it's true that when long reigning stars age, the filmmakers start to focus on personality cult of the hero than make films that include everyone.

I also feel that rise of cinema as an industry, has led to excessive focus on profits and commercialisation.

One could make a film like Khamoshi earlier because risk was less. Today stakes are higher.

Cable, TV, DVD, Internet have further harmed the industry. People used to atleast watch a film for fav actor or catchy song earlier. Now they can watch the "small" film online or get a DVD. We raved about Do Dooni Chaar but how many watched it in theatre? Where's the incentive for the makers and producers?

Not many want to take risk. Especially when they get ranked on basis of each release.

Smartly packaged, well marketed films with good story do well but even after successes like EV, Queen, Kahaani, Mardaani, I find makers less keen on trying different stuff. Maybe failure of other films like Heroine, Dedh Ishqiya Gulabi gang etc dissuade them from investing in this genre. 😕

Mallika-E-Bhais thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago
#25
She's spot on. Not only was this the first feminist song but it is essentially, a highly inspirational song. The entire dance sequence depicts the same with Waheeda's character with her arms spread wide, singing her heart Out. :)

It is a song of freedom & open skies & Guide will remain a thoroughly progressive movie for it's time. Loved it. Love Waheeda's Rosie. Like Guide, there will be no another Waheeda Rehman <3
Edited by Mallika-E-Bhais - 9 years ago
ibelieveinpink thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago
#26
What's also so weird is that Television has gotten regressive compared the late 80s and early 90s. I mean remember Tara or even Heena? Or that one show about the girl that gets raped and goes into coma and how are parents are trying to get her justice. Or shows like BAB that tackles youth issues like obssesive lovers, stalking, date rape drugs, etc.
It's a weird trend. I don't know if there's this struggle to become progressive and then all of sudden society thinks we've reached extreme levels of progressiveness and then they backtrack to extreme regressiveness.
Good point on DDC, but look at Yash Raj now and how they're next 3 releases are basically more "indie" type films. I think SRK (Sid Roy) took a lot of risks with smaller budget films that paid off and finally the more well-known production companies that are household names are using this strategy and reaching that urabn and rural market. BTW:Heroine and DI were just bad films that got a pretty decent opening. Sometimes small films don't work b/c they're bad, but there are good small films that need the right PH to take risks. DLKH was one of those that pops into my head. So was Vicky Donor, Paan Singh Tomar, Aamir, etc.
Mallika-E-Bhais thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: ibelieveinpink

What's also so weird is that Television has gotten regressive compared the late 80s and early 90s. I mean remember Tara or even Heena? Or that one show about the girl that gets raped and goes into coma and how are parents are trying to get her justice. Or shows like BAB that tackles youth issues like obssesive lovers, stalking, date rape drugs, etc.

It's a weird trend. I don't know if there's this struggle to become progressive and then all of sudden society thinks we've reached extreme levels of progressiveness and then they backtrack to extreme regressiveness.
Good point on DDC, but look at Yash Raj now and how they're next 3 releases are basically more "indie" type films. I think SRK (Sid Roy) took a lot of risks with smaller budget films that paid off and finally the more well-known production companies that are household names are using this strategy and reaching that urabn and rural market. BTW:Heroine and DI were just bad films that got a pretty decent opening. Sometimes small films don't work b/c they're bad, but there are good small films that need the right PH to take risks. DLKH was one of those that pops into my head. So was Vicky Donor, Paan Singh Tomar, Aamir, etc.


I loved Heena & Saans, Siski, and the Pallavi Joshi starrer show who se name am forgetting but she's the one who goes into a coma. Tv truly was highly progressive in the 90s! And it was excellent tv! Dekh bhai dekh, Tu Tu Main Main stills elicit laughs!! Stuff like Khichdi & SVS won't & can't be replicated Today so we are stuck with the rotting vegetables they dish out to us in the name of refined biryani.
ibelieveinpink thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: Mallika-E-Bhais


I loved Heena & Saans, Siski, and the Pallavi Joshi starrer show who se name am forgetting but she's the one who goes into a coma. Tv truly was highly progressive in the 90s! And it was excellent tv! Dekh bhai dekh, Tu Tu Main Main stills elicit laughs!! Stuff like Khichdi & SVS won't & can't be replicated Today so we are stuck with the rotting vegetables they dish out to us in the name of refined biryani.


Stupid Ekta. Marriage and re-marriage. Prerna was one of the most pathetic, weak characters to ahve ever existed on TV. And now we have the likes of Gopi bahu ruling the TV landscape...I just can't.
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#29
The 80s and 90s shows are class apart. Probably they existed because there was no TRP system.
Ever since they started measuring TRPs, shows became more regressive. Amanat being the frontrunner in this trend.

I think youth, educated, modern people watch less TV. The makers know their target audience is average neighbourhood aunty or housewife and this is why they started making regressive shows.

The point about regressive values might hold true. Surveys reveal even children have backward and rigid views on caste, gender, religion etc. Youth surveys also show prevalence of conservative attitude.
I don't understand why this happens. Maybe communities foster conservative values as a defense mechanism to "protect" the values which they feel, are disintegrating.
return_to_hades thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago
#30
Part of the reason of the film industry going down is the Khan ego. I am a fan, but I have to admit, none of them can share the limelight. They all want to be larger than life heroes. Everyone else was trying to be like the Khans and women got sidelined.
We are again seeing a shifting trend towards better stories. Leads like Ayushman Khurana or Randeep Hooda who don't mind sharing the limelight or letting women take it.

While we aped the west in some aspects, we never seem to have embraced the positives. Western music, cinema, and fashion was blindly thrust on Indian audiences as "cool".

Helen Mirren, Judi Dench, Meryl Streep, all get so much reverence despite their age. They continue to get cast in substantial roles. Forty year old men don't play teenagers. They play their age. Angeline Jolie, Sigourney Weaver, Sandra Bullock and the likes did action flicks and were embraced by men and women as action stars. The younger generation has like Emma Watson, Emma Stone, Anna Kendrick, Rooney Mara, Anne Hathaway are making a name for their bright personalities as well as their roles.

While I do admit that female sexuality and sex in general needs a positive outlook and better place in Indian cinema - I don't understand why Bollywood directors are focused on kissing and skin as modernization of Bollywood. Why can't they take other positives from Hollywood? It is changing with films like Gulaab Gang, Mardaani and such - but we need more.
Top